# Employers now demanding job applicants Facebook passwords

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [March 23, 2012, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569 "2012-03-23T01:43:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrotherCadfael](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@BrotherCadfael](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrotherCadfael)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2012, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/81 "2012-03-24T21:35:26Z")

</div>

Prosecutors in the Lori Drew case contended that violating a web site’s terms of service could be a federal felony. This contention was rejected by the court, but it was seriously advocated by the prosecution and, if I recall correctly, the US Justice Department.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![suranyi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e36b37/32.png) [@suranyi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/suranyi)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2012, 10:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/82 "2012-03-24T22:42:33Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> I asked if YOU experienced this at any companies. Did you work at any of the examples?
> 
> I should note that most of the examples of employers requiring Facebook passwords seem to be local and state level government agencies or academic institutions. Not companies.

Just as a point of reference, I was just talking about this issue with a friend who is a career counselor. She has helped thousands of people go through the job search process. And she says that she hasn’t heard of anyone who actually had to reveal any Facebook passwords. So it’s really not a common thing.

The only cases specifically mentioned in the news stories seem to be certain police agencies.

That said, I’m glad that Facebook and Congress are both coming out against the practice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Typo\_Negative](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/typo_negative/32/484_2.png) [@Typo\_Negative](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Typo_Negative)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2012, 12:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/83 "2012-03-25T00:01:59Z")

</div>

This _sounds_ bogus. In my company, telling another person your password is a firable offense. I can’t imagine HR would ever ask someone to divulge a password for anything.

If I were asked to divulge a password in an interview, that would be the end of the interview. I would not work a company that asked this. This means they are scumbags.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eva\_Luna](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e495f1/32.png) [@Eva\_Luna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eva_Luna)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2012, 2:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/84 "2012-03-25T02:28:49Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny\_L.A](#):
>
> I never heard IBM were _that_ bad, but I do remember hearing in the '80s that they had a ‘company uniform’. From [Wiki](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM#Working_at_IBM) (footnote link changed to direct link to citation):
> 
> I’ve heard anecdotes of employees being disciplined for wearing the wrong colour shoes.

A college friend of mine was working there when, in his early 20s, he had emergency brain surgery because of some kind of defective blood vessel, which burst and basically left him functioning like someone who’d had a stroke. (Poor guy was the picture of health otherwise - did hundred-mile bike rides for fun, and it was REALLY out of the blue.) He said he had to do a lot of explaining about his bizarre hairstyle while the hair grew back over the chunk of skull they’d had to remove for the emergency brain surgery. Between that, and the slurred speech…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2012, 3:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/85 "2012-03-25T03:43:23Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> However, these are contractual terms between you and Facebook. Multimegacorp is not a party to this agreement, and so they are not violating any terms themselves; they are merely asking you to do so.

Unless Multimegacorp has a Facebook account of their own, right? And then wouldn’t the HR person be acting as an authorized agent of Multimegacorp, and thus the company (as a corporate person, of course) be violating the TOS?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2012, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/86 "2012-03-25T16:28:29Z")

</div>

> [@Senegoid](#):
>
> Breaking news: Facebook warns employers to knock it off.  
> [Facebook warns employers not to demand passwords](http://news.yahoo.com/facebook-warns-employers-not-demand-passwords-141726769.html)

Ideally, such requests should be considered an attempt at illegal hacking (via social engineering), and punished as such under the computer-crime laws.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2012, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/87 "2012-03-25T16:31:36Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> However, these are contractual terms between you and Facebook. Multimegacorp is not a party to this agreement, and so they are not violating any terms themselves; they are merely asking you to do so.

You don’t have to sign any contract to be subject to the laws that say you’re not allowed to gain, or attempt to gain, unauthorized access to computer files. (It’s still unauthorized if you ask for a password from someone who isn’t supposed to give it to you; otherwise, hackers who used the social-engineering approach instead of directly applying cybernetic black arts would get off scot-free).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Projammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/projammer/32/559_2.png) [@Projammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Projammer)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2012, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/88 "2012-03-25T17:51:55Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I don’t know.
> 
> First, it seems clear that the actions would indeed violate Facebook’s [Terms of Service.](http://www.facebook.com/legal/terms) Section3, item 5 says, “You will not solicit login information or access an account belonging to someone else.” Item 11 says, “You will not facilitate or encourage any violations of this Statement.” Taken together, these two would seem to forbid the practice we’re discussing.

Sounds like this might give you an opening for leverage. Given that there’s a good chance that the prospective employer will have their own facebook presence. Reporting the actions could get their account suspended and ultimately deleted.

Admitted, they shouldn’t be asking in the first place. And legislation directly prohibiting it is probably the best solution. But the low level aggravation might convince some companies to abandon the procedure in the interim.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2012, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/89 "2012-03-25T22:48:37Z")

</div>

> [@Steve\_MB](#):
>
> You don’t have to sign any contract to be subject to the laws that say you’re not allowed to gain, or attempt to gain, unauthorized access to computer files. (It’s still unauthorized if you ask for a password from someone who isn’t supposed to give it to you; otherwise, hackers who used the social-engineering approach instead of directly applying cybernetic black arts would get off scot-free).

This is interesting.

I don’t think I agree, but I might not be seeing it.

Most social engineering techniques I know of involve fraud. That is, you pretend to have authorized access and convince someone to give you credentials. Merely gaining valid credentials does not mean you have permission to use the system. So a social engineering hacker that got valid credentials could not claim his access was authorized.

But if you are told that you have access, then I think your access is authorized.

If my company, which has a computer network but no defined policies or rules of behavior, gives me a user name and password to access the company intranet, and I give those credentials to my friend and tell him he can use them to take a computer-based training class hosted by my company…is his access unauthorized?

But now let’s say that my friend knows my company has a policy forbidding the sharing of user names and passwords. Does his access become unauthorized?

Finally, do the laws you mention apply when a company’s TOS are violated? I know prosecutors tried that argument in the Lori Drew case, but the court rejected it. What examples were you thinking of?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2012, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/90 "2012-03-25T22:49:48Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> Unless Multimegacorp has a Facebook account of their own, right? And then wouldn’t the HR person be acting as an authorized agent of Multimegacorp, and thus the company (as a corporate person, of course) be violating the TOS?

Yup. If the company has a Facebook account, they are violating Facebook TOS by doing this, I feel sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 5:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/91 "2012-03-27T05:57:21Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> No.
> 
> First, the Fourth Amendment does nothing to prevent me from tapping your phone or opening your mail.

Wait a minute. Isn’t it against Federal law to open other people’s mail, unless it’s your job to do so, e.g. a secretary or administrative assistant?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rachellelogram](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rachellelogram/32/8689_2.png) [@Rachellelogram](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rachellelogram)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 6:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/92 "2012-03-27T06:28:36Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> Wait a minute. Isn’t it against Federal law to open other people’s mail, unless it’s your job to do so, e.g. a secretary or administrative assistant?

Yes it’s illegal, but that’s not covered under the Bill of Rights. It’s under [**18 U.S.C. § 1703 : US Code - Section 1703: Delay or destruction of mail or newspapers**](http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C83.txt).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 2:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/93 "2012-03-27T14:07:02Z")

</div>

**Bricker** :

In your opinion, can an applicant be compelled by an employer to revealed protected class information (age, sex, race, religion) that is on his Facebook page?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![control-z](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/eada6e/32.png) [@control-z](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/control-z)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 2:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/94 "2012-03-27T14:36:17Z")

</div>

Unfortunately I would think people who are out of work and getting poorer by the hour would be more motivated to make some money than protect their privacy.

I’m against the idea of sharing your login, but who owns your Facebook login information, you or Facebook? It’s your e-mail address, it’s a password you made up. Who owns your Facebook data, your list of friends, etc? It seems that it would be your information to share if you choose, regardless of what format it’s in. And in spite of the Facebook TOS I don’t see any way Facebook could know it’s not you logging in, unless they see a large number of logins from the same HR terminal at Acme Corporation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 2:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/95 "2012-03-27T14:51:01Z")

</div>

> [@Fear\_Itself](#):
>
> **Bricker** :
> 
> In your opinion, can an applicant be compelled by an employer to revealed protected class information (age, sex, race, religion) that is on his Facebook page?

I’m not sure what you mean by “compelled.” Can the prospective employer ask to see his Facebook page, and refuse to hire the applicant if he refuses, even though the Facebook page contains information pertaining to the applicant’s age, sex, race, and/or religion?

I think so, yes. But it would seem to be a foolish move for the same reason that asking those questions is foolish: that because basing hiring decisions on those factors is illegal, the best interview practice is to never ask such questions. Indeed, they’re often reported as “illegal interview questions,” but so far as I can determine, there is no law forbidding the questions themselves; the law forbids basing hiring on the answers and allows a presumption that if you ask the question, you want to know the answer and consider it relevant.

The Facebook thing isn’t as clear-cut, though, because presumably you want to check out other things in Facebook, and are getting the protected class information by accident.

By analogy, as an employer you cannot based a hiring decision on the applicant’s family situation. So you shouldn’t ask if a female applicant has children. But you can ask about a gap in employment, even if the result is that the applicant answers that she took the time off when her children were born.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 2:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/96 "2012-03-27T14:53:34Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> First, the Fourth Amendment does nothing to prevent me from tapping your phone or opening your mail. It prevents the federal government from doing so, and when applied to the states via operation of the Fourteenth Amendment, it also prevents state governments from doing so. But it has nothing to do with private actors.

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> Wait a minute. Isn’t it against Federal law to open other people’s mail, unless it’s your job to do so, e.g. a secretary or administrative assistant?

> [@rachelellogram](#):
>
> Yes it’s illegal, but that’s not covered under the Bill of Rights. It’s under [**18 U.S.C. § 1703 : US Code - Section 1703: Delay or destruction of mail or newspapers**](http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C83.txt).

**rachelellogram** ’s got it. Yes, it’s against federal law, but no, the Fourth Amendment isn’t involved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 3:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/97 "2012-03-27T15:36:14Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> The Facebook thing isn’t as clear-cut, though, because presumably you want to check out other things in Facebook, and are getting the protected class information by accident.

So the prospective employer can’t base a hiring decision on the applicant’s age, but they could ask to make a copy of the applicant’s driver’s license, ostensibly to confirm their identity, and gain their date of birth as collateral information?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VunderBob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/839c29/32.png) [@VunderBob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VunderBob)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/98 "2012-03-27T15:56:34Z")

</div>

> [@Morgyn](#):
>
> You’re kidding. :eek::eek::eek: IBM really tried to control their employees lives to that extent? You’ve got to be kidding.
> 
> Please tell me you’re kidding.

No. Ford Motor company did the ame thing in the 20s and 30s, and Electronic Data Systems as founded by Ross Perot did, too. I worked for EDS during the GM years, and had to put up with it. I also walked out on them because of it.

FWIW, Ross worked for IBM when he started EDS, and IBM was the inspiration for EDS’ _in loco parentis_ policies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2012, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/99 "2012-03-27T16:34:35Z")

</div>

> [@MsRobyn](#):
>
> I dunno, but I’d call holding out a job offer to be duress. How many people would kiss off a job in exchange for privacy?

A company requiring your Facebook password in an interview is certainly one that doesn’t respect you, would you want to find that out the hard way a few years later from any number of scenarios?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnpost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f17d59/32.png) [@johnpost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/johnpost)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2012, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569/100 "2012-04-02T22:31:31Z")

</div>

teacher fired in Michigan for not turning over password.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/employers-now-demanding-job-applicants-facebook-passwords/616569.md?page=6)
