# English Dopers: Run-up to election, what's it like?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [April 21, 2005, 9:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484 "2005-04-21T21:20:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![owlstretchingtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/958977/32.png) [@owlstretchingtime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/owlstretchingtime)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 9:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/41 "2005-04-23T09:33:20Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> ‘Everybody’s’ wait goes down by a few hours. The rich have their waiting time go down to zero. Fair?
> 
> And no, as has been pointed out earlier, the expenditure within the NHS can’t be measured simplistically in comparison to Bupa charges. Who trains doctors? Who trains nurses? Who oversees many medical advances, innovations, etc?

Fair? - mebbe not. Better? - Yup.

Since when has everything had to be “fair” (ie universally shit)? Nothing else is “fair” so why should this be. This vile government of chancers always says that “hard working families” will be given the rewards for their hard work - this is a reward. Why can’t they have it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/cc9497/32.png) [@Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt.Ridley_s_Shooting_Party)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 9:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/42 "2005-04-23T09:38:51Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> ‘Everybody’s’ wait goes down by a few hours. The rich have their waiting time go down to zero. Fair?

And what’s the alternative? What’s the remedy being proposed by Labour? To keep the status quo and have everyone’s waiting times remain the same? That’s exactly what’s going to happen.

You talk about fairness as if the current system is fair in the first place. Is it fair that a man should have to wait months (years) for an operation when he could receive his care immediately if he goes private? Is it fair that, after being virtually forced into private care by the waiting times on the NHS, his NI contributions should be eaten? No, it isn’t. What’s more, the Tories are only generalising what is already happening in the NHS. £80 million a year is spent on private care in the NHS. Why shouldn’t all patients in every part of the country be able to benefit from this scheme?

Frankly, a large increase in quality of care for the “rich” (although I don’t necessarily think you have to be rich to pay for many operations) and a slight increase in the quality of care for everyone else is better than what Labour are proposing.

> [@](#):
>
> And no, as has been pointed out earlier, the expenditure within the NHS can’t be measured simplistically in comparison to Bupa charges. Who trains doctors? Who trains nurses? Who oversees many medical advances, innovations, etc?

What has this got to do with the NHS paying half of the cost of an _NHS operation_ to a private company?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martha\_Medea](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/43a26b/32.png) [@Martha\_Medea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martha_Medea)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 9:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/43 "2005-04-23T09:38:52Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> Yes, all seats are up for grabs. And you’re right, that we don’t elect the PM directly - by default, the leader of the winning party takes the post. (Theoretically it would be possible for Labour to win and for Blair to lose his seat, in which case they’d have to decide on their new leader straight away. Anyone know if anything like this has ever happened?)

Give them a peerage so they can serve as a member of the House of Lords?

Lynda Chalker, Conservative Minister for Overseas Development, lost her Wallasey seat in the 1992 election, was promptly made a life peer and continued in her ministerial post as Baroness Chalker until Labour won the election in 1997.

I know little about constitutional matters, but could that not happen if the PM lost his seat?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/cc9497/32.png) [@Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt.Ridley_s_Shooting_Party)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 9:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/44 "2005-04-23T09:42:01Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> This election is indeed very boring. I live in a safe Labour seat and have little idea for whom I should vote. Hopefully there will be hustings today in the town centre.

Me too. I come from an ex-mining town. There’s no point in even bothering to vote. Franky, Labour could nuke Wigan and they’d still be elected with a large majority.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![owlstretchingtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/958977/32.png) [@owlstretchingtime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/owlstretchingtime)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 9:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/45 "2005-04-23T09:56:51Z")

</div>

> [@+MDI](#):
>
> Me too. I come from an ex-mining town. There’s no point in even bothering to vote. Franky, Labour could nuke Wigan and they’d still be elected with a large majority.

Be careful what you wish for…

I live in a VERY marginal seat (Putney) which is within easy reach of Westminster, so I cannot move without being pestered by some cocksocket with a rosette on. I’d get them to kiss the “babies” if I could, as I know my brats would bite their noses off.

Believe me - it’s a royal nuisance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir\_Doris](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5ac83/32.png) [@Sir\_Doris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sir_Doris)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 10:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/46 "2005-04-23T10:01:54Z")

</div>

> [@Martha](#):
>
> Give them a peerage so they can serve as a member of the House of Lords?
> 
> Lynda Chalker, Conservative Minister for Overseas Development, lost her Wallasey seat in the 1992 election, was promptly made a life peer and continued in her ministerial post as Baroness Chalker until Labour won the election in 1997.
> 
> I know little about constitutional matters, but could that not happen if the PM lost his seat?

Conventionally, 20th century and beyond, anyhow, the Prime Minister is the leader of his party in the Commons. I can’t find anything to say this _has_ to be the case, and certainly it’s not always been so. However, given the Commons is where the power is, it would be pretty much impossible to lead from the Lords. Tony Bann had to get an act of Parliament to allow him to renounce his peerage in order to retain his seat in the Commons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/cc9497/32.png) [@Capt.Ridley\_s\_Shooting\_Party](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt.Ridley_s_Shooting_Party)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 10:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/47 "2005-04-23T10:06:48Z")

</div>

> [@owlstretchingtime](#):
>
> Be careful what you wish for…
> 
> I live in a VERY marginal seat (Putney) which is within easy reach of Westminster, so I cannot move without being pestered by some cocksocket with a rosette on. I’d get them to kiss the “babies” if I could, as I know my brats would bite their noses off.
> 
> Believe me - it’s a royal nuisance.

Ahh, that’s just at home. When I’m at university, I can’t even walk down the street to Tesco without being pestered by some far left party attracted to the area by the number of students.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![owlstretchingtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/958977/32.png) [@owlstretchingtime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/owlstretchingtime)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 10:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/48 "2005-04-23T10:09:00Z")

</div>

In the unlikely event that a PM lost his seat an MP in a very safe seat would apply for the Chiltern Hundreds and he would be parachuted in.

In the meanwhile he would be represented in the commons by an appointee.

(ie Prescott as PM - Imagine the hilarity)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avenger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Avenger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avenger)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2005, 1:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/49 "2005-04-23T13:44:19Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Are English celebrities telling you who to vote for and threatening to move to France (or elsewhere) if “X” is elected?

Celebrity annoying twat [Paul Daniels](http://www.pauldaniels.co.uk/html/index.htm) did vow to leave the country if Labour won in 1997. So, enthused by this more than by anything a politician had ever said, I voted Labour. But the fucker’s still here :mad:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2005, 8:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/50 "2005-04-24T08:40:26Z")

</div>

Well, I went into town yesterday and enjoyed the St George’s Day celebrations but there were no hustings. ☹ There were only some people from the Respect party handing out leaflets.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avenger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Avenger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avenger)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2005, 9:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/51 "2005-04-24T09:31:17Z")

</div>

> [@owlstretchingtime](#):
>
> In the unlikely event that a PM lost his seat an MP in a very safe seat would apply for the Chiltern Hundreds and he would be parachuted in.
> 
> In the meanwhile he would be represented in the commons by an appointee.
> 
> (ie Prescott as PM - Imagine the hilarity)

I see that Reg Keys, whose son was killed in Iraq, is standing against Blair in Sedgefield.

Come on, people of Sedgefield, you know you want to…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2005, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/52 "2005-04-24T15:02:33Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Well, I went into town yesterday and enjoyed the St George’s Day celebrations but there were no hustings. ☹ There were only some people from the Respect party handing out leaflets.

😕 What are “hustings”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Avenger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Avenger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Avenger)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2005, 3:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/53 "2005-04-24T15:14:41Z")

</div>

‘Hustings’ usually refers to an organised public event, where each candidate has a chance to speak and put forward their policies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2005, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/54 "2005-04-24T15:38:44Z")

</div>

> [@Avenger](#):
>
> ‘Hustings’ usually refers to an organised public event, where each candidate has a chance to speak and put forward their policies.

Is that something different than a candidates’ debate? (In the U.S., candidates for any office above the level of county commissioner give most of their public speeches to rallies of their own supporters; they face opponents directly only in a structured debate setting with a moderator and, usually, prepared questions.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2005, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/55 "2005-04-24T15:48:25Z")

</div>

It’s less organised than a debate - pretty much just a series of speeches. It’s something that essentially belongs to pre-television days, when getting out into the local area and being seen making speeches was an effective form of publicity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Celyn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9dc877/32.png) [@Celyn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Celyn)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2005, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/56 "2005-04-24T16:04:02Z")

</div>

Yep - it’s less formalised - it is neither a formalised one-to-one arranged for televsion, nor a speech _only_ to the candidate’s \*own" supporters. More along the lines of a public meeting whether supporters and others may attend as wished, and ask questions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2005, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/57 "2005-04-24T16:17:52Z")

</div>

> [@Celyn](#):
>
> Yep - it’s less formalised - it is neither a formalised one-to-one arranged for televsion, nor a speech _only_ to the candidate’s \*own" supporters. More along the lines of a public meeting whether supporters and others may attend as wished, and ask questions.

We have those too – but only for local politicians. I’ve never seen a candidate even for a stage legislature appear in such a setting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![owlstretchingtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/958977/32.png) [@owlstretchingtime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/owlstretchingtime)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2005, 10:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/58 "2005-04-25T10:44:10Z")

</div>

We had them on Saturday in our local church hall. They were well attended (I didn’t go - i just noticed in passing)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yojimbo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yojimbo/32/232_2.png) [@yojimbo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yojimbo)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2005, 11:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/59 "2005-04-25T11:25:46Z")

</div>

Jeremy Paxman’s interviews with the 3 leaders can e seen at the following link.

[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/newsnight\_election\_2005/4421655.stm](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/newsnight_election_2005/4421655.stm)

He gave Blair a bit of a bashing.

Good to see leaders being put to task. With a tough questioner asking tough questions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![seosamh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce7236/32.png) [@seosamh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/seosamh)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2005, 11:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484/60 "2005-04-25T11:39:34Z")

</div>

zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/english-dopers-run-up-to-election-whats-it-like/300484.md?page=4)
