# erl's getting SDMB old

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/erls-getting-sdmb-old/88502>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [October 19, 2001, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/erls-getting-sdmb-old/88502 "2001-10-19T21:55:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2001, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/erls-getting-sdmb-old/88502/1 "2001-10-19T21:55:57Z")

</div>

Fucking A, I got my first twitch in GD today to respond to a post with only links to old threads and mutter some comment about “this topic having been done to death.”

I think that is a sign of SDMB-fogie-ism. Fuck that, I love GD.

But goddammit, the faith argument is getting to be a fucking IMHO the way people play it out anymore. No intense philosophy, no perspective of different ways to view the same topic, we get the old [linkety-link](http://www.m-w.com/), followed by a [\*\*quote]d definition, and then proceed to simultaneously side with and counter the OP.

Now, not that many debated don’t give a cursory covering of what really are huge topics, but man, the whole “faith/blind faith/atheists-have-faith-too” (whatever happened to **jmullaney?** ) is like a broken-glass enema to me.

Didn’t used to feel that way. I’ve enjoyed submitting comments, linking to old threads as reference _while still commenting_, and generally being a what I thought a GD’er should be: inquisitive, patient, helpful, and tolerant.

And then it happens again. **wring** , my dear, your frustration and the prostitution threads are palpable now. Everyone who ganged up on the Bush Defamation League™ cronies, and then gave up because of the endless procession of whining, has my understanding.

Maybe I’ve just been too active, and need to do more drive-bys like **handy** , **tracer** , or even **guin** ’s seemingly recent tactic. Aloofness.

Fuck! I’m getting to be a SDMB square! _sigh_ Any of the long-time posters have any advice?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![headshok](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e56c9b/32.png) [@headshok](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/headshok)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2001, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/erls-getting-sdmb-old/88502/2 "2001-10-19T22:23:19Z")

</div>

Dude, I don’t know how you GDers maintain the same level of intensity in post after post, but taking a break once in a while seems perfectly understandable. Of course, my posts are pretty inconsequential, so I don’t have to worry about those things. I’m always on a break!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fenris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fenris/32/498_2.png) [@Fenris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fenris)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2001, 10:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/erls-getting-sdmb-old/88502/3 "2001-10-19T22:24:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by erislover \*  
> \*\*Fuck! I’m getting to be a SDMB square! _sigh_ Any of the long-time posters have any advice? \*\*

Yes: Quadralaterals are for losers! Be an octogon or, better an oblate sphereoid! Geometry will set you free!

(When all else fails, try weirdness)

Fenris

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Esprix](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/esprix/32/7899_2.png) [@Esprix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Esprix)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2001, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/erls-getting-sdmb-old/88502/4 "2001-10-19T22:27:19Z")

</div>

Just read more of **Fenris** ’s posts. Him so funny! 😃

Esprix

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wring](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/838e76/32.png) [@wring](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wring)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2001, 10:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/erls-getting-sdmb-old/88502/5 "2001-10-19T22:52:40Z")

</div>

Change causes - for instance after the elections, the child molester and prostitution threads, and more recently after the 9/11 threads, I’ve decided that the topics I shall debate on consist of these:

Tapioca - manufactured or processed (obscure family reference)

Better living through hair products - fact or fallacy

and

bEGGONE dUST bUNNY mENACE.

Don’t know if it’ll work for you.

barring that, I suggest you have a teenager at home. That gives you a desperate reason to dive head first into the nearest on line debate. Of happy coincidence, my teen happens to be available for rent 😃
