# Essay says '“The Simpsons” hasn’t declined due to bad writing; its outdated politics no longer make sense"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Tags:** tv-shows-scripted\
**Created:** [March 21, 2021, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366 "2021-03-21T20:24:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Son\_of\_a\_Rich](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/son_of_a_rich/32/5439_2.png) [@Son\_of\_a\_Rich](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Son_of_a_Rich)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/81 "2021-03-22T20:59:19Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> I agree. I don’t feel that the Simpsons live in a suburb. Granted the show’s continuity is all over the place but Springfield is generally portrayed as an independent community rather than lying on the outskirts of some larger city.

The nature and location of the city changes as the situation requires. Sometimes they’re on the ocean, other time near a desert or next to the world’s most unclimbable mountain. When Bart sold his soul, they even had a subway. The town changes like the interior layout of the Simpsons’ house changes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/82 "2021-03-22T21:04:06Z")

</div>

> [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](#):
>
> And The Jetsons, The Roman Holidays, Wait till Your Father Gets Home, and to some extent Jonny Quest.

And Rocky and Bullwinkle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kk\_fusion](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kk_fusion/32/15276_2.png) [@kk\_fusion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kk_fusion)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/83 "2021-03-22T21:14:06Z")

</div>

> [@Son\_of\_a\_Rich](#):
>
> The nature and location of the city changes as the situation requires. Sometimes they’re on the ocean, other time near a desert or next to the world’s most unclimbable mountain. When Bart sold his soul, they even had a subway.

[Guide to Springfield, USA](https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/1q7apb/beautiful_detailed_map_of_the_simpsons/)

3rd Street Subway Station is marked, but no actual subway line shown. Perhaps it’s just a fancy name for an underground shopping center?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Q.Q.Switcheroo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/q.q.switcheroo/32/5713_2.png) [@Q.Q.Switcheroo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Q.Q.Switcheroo)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/84 "2021-03-22T21:49:31Z")

</div>

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> > [@JRDelirious](#):
> >
> > If he feels that what the audience needs is a cartoon family sitcom rubbing our faces in the collapse of the American Middle Class, he’s welcome to pitch one to the studio execs.
> > 
> > > Good luck pulling off such a sale.
> 
> One already exists and is very popular - Bob’s Burgers.

And there’s “F Is for Family” on Netflix, though that one’s a 70s period piece.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/85 "2021-03-22T21:51:52Z")

</div>

> [@Son\_of\_a\_Rich](#):
>
> The nature and location of the city changes as the situation requires. Sometimes they’re on the ocean, other time near a desert or next to the world’s most unclimbable mountain. When Bart sold his soul, they even had a subway. The town changes like the interior layout of the Simpsons’ house changes.

I feel I acknowledged this.

But my point was that Springfield is not typically portrayed as a suburb. The only other community that is mentioned with any regularity is Shelbyville and that is portrayed as Springfield’s equivalent, not as the big city that Springfield is a suburb of.

Capital City is occasionally mentioned and it’s a major city. But it’s portrayed as being some distance from Springfield. It’s certainly not portrayed as being a major factor in the lives of Springfield residents.

And that’s not true of suburbs. I’ve lived in suburbs (and live in one now). Part of living in a suburb is you’re involved in what’s going on in “the city” even if you live outside of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Q.Q.Switcheroo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/q.q.switcheroo/32/5713_2.png) [@Q.Q.Switcheroo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Q.Q.Switcheroo)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/86 "2021-03-22T21:51:56Z")

</div>

> [@kk\_fusion](#):
>
> 3rd Street Subway Station is marked, but no actual subway line shown. Perhaps it’s just a fancy name for an underground shopping center?

I give you the [Springfield Subway System](https://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/Springfield_Subway_System)!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/87 "2021-03-22T22:33:27Z")

</div>

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> The question that arises is… why aren’t there that many around now? Last Man Standing may have been the last well known one, right? Malcolm in the Middle was a show more akin to what the article writer is talking about - blue collar parents trying to make things work.
> 
> But it seems that most sitcoms these days have been more of the friends coming together, hanging out in the 20s and 30s and not quite yet settling down yet. Or focused on workplaces.

I guess I figured, they seem to keep putting episodes of _The Goldbergs_ out there, each one often followed by an episode of _American Housewife_ — and I figure there’s at least some conceptual overlap with that new sitcom where _Kenan_ is raising two daughters; and, despite the ‘prequel’ gimmick, some overlap with the kids on _Mixed-ish_ and _Young Sheldon_; and I figure that _Modern Family_ was still sucking up plenty of air this time last year, when _Man With A Plan_ was wrapping up its run shortly after _Fresh Off The Boat_ did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madmonk28](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/madmonk28/32/20811_2.png) [@madmonk28](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/madmonk28)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/88 "2021-03-22T22:37:29Z")

</div>

Because like a lot of mediocrity, it is ubiquitous. W a second my question, why does my opinion trigger you so?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/89 "2021-03-22T23:17:16Z")

</div>

Dino, and the other dinosaur slaves, broke the 4th wall all the time. Though not in an adult manner, I guess.

“Eh, it’s a living.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/90 "2021-03-22T23:22:51Z")

</div>

Well, no. I think the article writer was upset that the show wasn’t trying to make some kind of deliberate statement, and my point is that the show has rarely tried to make a deliberate statement of any kind, and where there is any political bias, it’s more in the background about how characters are treated and things like that. The Simpsons doesn’t do “Very Special Episodes”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/91 "2021-03-22T23:24:40Z")

</div>

Not to hijack about another animated comedy, but that’s a good argument as to why Arlen in “King of the Hill” isn’t a thinly masked Garland, TX, and is its own fictional small/medium town.

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> The question that arises is… why aren’t there that many around now? Last Man Standing may have been the last well known one, right? Malcolm in the Middle was a show more akin to what the article writer is talking about - blue collar parents trying to make things work.
> 
> But it seems that most sitcoms these days have been more of the friends coming together, hanging out in the 20s and 30s and not quite yet settling down yet. Or focused on workplaces.

I think that’s a big piece of it; it’s been thoroughly lampooned and mutated by _The Simpsons_ and other latter-day family sitcoms like _Arrested Development_, _Modern Family_, _Married with Children_, etc…

Plus, I think it’s well worn ground where there’s not so much stuff left to go into in the family sitcom anymore; it would take a fairly unique show to succeed after all that as a straight family sitcom.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2021, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/92 "2021-03-22T23:34:29Z")

</div>

I think the article has a point, but I’m not convinced that the political salience of the Simpsons is that relevant to its quality. When I think of the best episodes of the Simpsons (and my favorite ones), the socioeconomic plight of the Simpsons is only rarely a major issue.

I also am going to disagree with the claim that the quality of the writing has dropped off as much as people think. I watched the Simpsons from the early 90s through the mid-00s, but I also occasionally watched an episode or a season after that, and they’re still good.

Mostly what’s changed is that there are a lot more avenues for the type of humor that the Simpsons was the cultural touchstone of. It was a pillar of television culture at the time, and now it’s not, and that has more to do with the fracturing of entertainment and the long tail of streaming than it does with the writers room at the Simpsons or the salience of politics.

The top rated primetime shows in the 90s had 20+million viewers. The top-rated shows now are barely over 10 million.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 12:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/93 "2021-03-23T00:10:58Z")

</div>

> [@ZosterSandstorm](#):
>
> An obvious explanation is that skewering of the “traditional family sitcom” was a motivating premise of _The Simpsons_ , much more so than being economically relatable to its entire audience, and after your whole reason for existence has been thoroughly battered by the likes of Swartzwelder, Meyer, and O’Brien for 8 or 9 good years, it’s hard to maintain cultural momentum. There’s few TV shows left whose major creative forces were in the industry before _The Simpsons_ hit big and we’re at near-100% saturation of shows made by people whose senses of humor were formed after _The Simpsons_ completely changed the culture of American comedy.

I think this is the answer. Satirizing the big happy family depicted in sitcoms is the whole point of the Simpsons. I don’t think the point was ever to be an accurate depiction of an American family except when it was necessary to deconstruct the tropes it was making fun of.

Also I agree with the article that the lifestyle depicted is much tougher to live nowadays than it was in the 90’s, but I don’t think that it’s impossible to be apolitical nowadays. I think for most Americans, politics isn’t something that occupies all that much mental space, even with Trump. I think everyone has an opinion on the pandemic, but I think afterwards it’s going to be a lot like it was 10 years ago where most people have a vague feeling that the country is leaving them behind but aren’t necessarily going to be paying attention to it more than on a casual basis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 12:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/94 "2021-03-23T00:49:04Z")

</div>

Rocky and Bullwinkle was at least as subversive and adult than was The Simpsons. Looney Tunes was aimed at both adults and children. The thing is, many of the ‘adult’ jokes involved a culture that no longer exists, so people don’t get the references. A few are timeless like their riffs on Wagner and the Barber of Seville, but lots are riffs on movies and actors and politicians of the time who are no longer remembered.

In the early days of cinema, cartoons were often very adult. Don’t forget Betty Boop, whose sexual innuendo and tiny flapper dress was found to be in violations of the Hays act. Later there was Fritz the Cat, the first cartoon to get an X rating. In fact, the idea of cartoons as ‘children’s entertainment’ only even started after the Hays code forced removal or modification of adult content, but then ‘safe’ cartoons like Looney Toons and Rocky and Bullwinkle slipped adult content in under the eadar. You can find dirty or otherwise adult jokes and adult references in many of the old cartoons of the 50’s and 60’s.

And it made sense that they would be like that, as the primary place people saw early cartoons was at the theater, where adults and children coild both be found.

One example was an old Three Little Pigs cartoon, where there was a picture of ‘father’ on the wall, and it was a picture of some linked sausages. In another one, Daffy Duck is reading “Playduck”. Tame now, but at the time Playboy was considered slightly scandalous.

There’s lots more. During WWII there were cartoons featuring “Private SNAFU”. SNAFU is an acronym meaning, “Situation Normal - All Fucked Up”. I’ll bet parents had fun explaining what that meant to the little kids…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/95 "2021-03-23T01:02:28Z")

</div>

When would the little kids ever have seen a Private SNAFU cartoon? They were shown to members of the military.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/96 "2021-03-23T01:08:14Z")

</div>

Only to them? I thought they played with newsreels during the war. But you may be right. Still, it’s a cartoon aimed at adults… There were a LOT of WWII themed Looney Toons cartoons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ISiddiqui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/97f17d/32.png) [@ISiddiqui](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ISiddiqui)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/97 "2021-03-23T12:57:00Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](#):
>
> I guess I figured, they seem to keep putting episodes of _The Goldbergs_ out there, each one often followed by an episode of _American Housewife_ — and I figure there’s at least some conceptual overlap with that new sitcom where _Kenan_ is raising two daughters; and, despite the ‘prequel’ gimmick, some overlap with the kids on _Mixed-ish_ and _Young Sheldon_ ; and I figure that _Modern Family_ was still sucking up plenty of air this time last year, when _Man With A Plan_ was wrapping up its run shortly after _Fresh Off The Boat_ did.

Modern Family is quite famous as show not about a nuclear family but 2 generations of a family, and the patriarch is remarried. A nuclear family sitcom would be mostly focused on the Dunphys, perhaps.

Goldbergs, Young Sheldon, and Fresh Off The Boat are deliberately set in the past.

I believe that Man With A Plan, Mixed-ish, and American Housewife don’t do all the well with ratings (Man With A Plan got canceled).

I’ll be interested to see if this new Kenan show can make some waves. Although the premise there is that the father is recently widowed and lives with his father-in-law and brother.

> [@bump](#):
>
> Plus, I think it’s well worn ground where there’s not so much stuff left to go into in the family sitcom anymore; it would take a fairly unique show to succeed after all that as a straight family sitcom.

But, as noted above, there are family sitcoms, they just have different conceptions of what “Modern” families are like (no pun intended) - well, or are nostalgia trips.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 1:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/98 "2021-03-23T13:32:07Z")

</div>

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> But, as noted above, there are family sitcoms, they just have different conceptions of what “Modern” families are like (no pun intended) - well, or are nostalgia trips.

Maybe you’re right, and the change actually started long ago- I’ve always thought _All in The Family_ was something of a skewering of that, by having Archie Bunker be sort of the anti-dad when compared to Mike Brady, Ward Cleaver or Stephen Douglas (My Three Sons), or any of the other pre-1971 family sitcoms. It was sort of like the proto-_Roseanne/The Conners_ in that I suspect at the time, many more families were like the Bunkers, and not like the Bradys or Cleavers.

Either way, the Simpsons were definitely a long nail in that coffin, as it has always clearly been a sort of satire of both the classic family sitcom AND the idyllic small/medium sized town as portrayed in those shows (and movies like Back to the Future for that matter).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 4:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/99 "2021-03-23T16:48:11Z")

</div>

> [@ISiddiqui](#):
>
> > [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](#):
> >
> > I guess I figured, they seem to keep putting episodes of _The Goldbergs_ out there, each one often followed by an episode of _American Housewife_ — and I figure there’s at least some conceptual overlap with that new sitcom where _Kenan_ is raising two daughters; and, despite the ‘prequel’ gimmick, some overlap with the kids on _Mixed-ish_ and _Young Sheldon_ ; and I figure that _Modern Family_ was still sucking up plenty of air this time last year, when _Man With A Plan_ was wrapping up its run shortly after _Fresh Off The Boat_ did.
> 
> Modern Family is quite famous as show not about a nuclear family but 2 generations of a family, and the patriarch is remarried. A nuclear family sitcom would be mostly focused on the Dunphys, perhaps.
> 
> Goldbergs, Young Sheldon, and Fresh Off The Boat are deliberately set in the past.

Fair enough, but: I was thinking that, while Modern Family was doing plenty of _other_ stuff, the go-to move was still right there as needed. Sure, go write a B plot for Gloria or Mitch or whoever; but then keep the episode moving along by cutting back to a sitcom kid, making their way through a classic sitcom-kid scenario, and getting set up to deliver a sitcom-kid line.

At that: yeah, The Goldbergs can always do a quick Remember-The-‘80s bit about a sitcom kid geeking out about some brand-new thing called Indiana Jones or Knight Rider or whatever; but you’re writing an _episode_ here, so also throw in a coming-of-age subplot for him for him to quip about in front of his school locker; and, right as that’s about to overstay its welcome, cut to Sitcom Dad exhaustedly saying something appropriate upon coming home to watch TV from his easy chair after a day at work, and then get his reaction after Sitcom Mom perkily gives him a heads-up about some big parent-teacher thing. _You_ know.

And so on: whatever the show, you’d write stuff that plays into that show’s gimmick, because of course you would; but if you _also_ have the advantage of being able to write Standard Sitcom stuff as appropriate — with lines that you could’ve given to Lisa Simpson or Bart Simpson, or lines you could given to Homer or Marge, or whatever — then you pad an episode out with it, or even build an episode around it while using the gimmick for mere padding.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ISiddiqui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/97f17d/32.png) [@ISiddiqui](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ISiddiqui)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2021, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366/100 "2021-03-23T16:54:19Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](#):
>
> I was thinking that, while Modern Family was doing plenty of _other_ stuff, the go-to move was still right there as needed. Sure, go write a B plot for Gloria or Mitch or whoever; but then keep the episode moving along by cutting back to a sitcom kid, making their way through a classic sitcom-kid scenario, and getting set up to deliver a sitcom-kid line.

Classic sitcom-kid scenario in a very different look of what family is. The kids would be trying to get away with stuff from not just their mothers, but either their step-grandmother (for the Dunphys) or technically half-sister (for Manny). Not to mention a long plot point where Phil is turned on by his step-mother in law who is the same age as his wife.

The argument made about the Simpsons isn’t classic sitcom tropes, but rather whether the sort of family that is demonstrated still resonates with TV audiences, aside from a nostalgic way.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/essay-says-the-simpsons-hasn-t-declined-due-to-bad-writing-its-outdated-politics-no-longer-make-sense/938366.md?page=6)
