# Evolution of kissing, shaking hands, laughing

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 22, 2002, 7:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952 "2002-04-22T07:27:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gitfiddle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/898d66/32.png) [@gitfiddle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gitfiddle)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 7:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/1 "2002-04-22T07:27:39Z")

</div>

Well, I’ve done my share of the three and all of the sudden I wondered to myself, "When/why the hall did people start doing them (kissing, shaking hands, and laughing that is). Where on the evolutional train track did people decided that they would like to massage their special friends tongue with their own, have a quick salutory dance with a comrade, and thrust bursts of air out of their lungs in enjoyment. If anyone knows of any scientific/theoretical material relating to this, please tell me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Badtz\_Maru](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e36b37/32.png) [@Badtz\_Maru](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Badtz_Maru)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 8:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/2 "2002-04-22T08:04:57Z")

</div>

I read a novel set in Japan during the Tokugawa Shogunate and it claimed that kissing was unknown until introduced by Westerners. I was a bit surprised, and the book seemed to get most of it’s other details correct (I got interested in that era of Japanese history after playing Nobunaga’s Ambition for the NES).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ranchoth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ranchoth/32/1066_2.png) [@Ranchoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ranchoth)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 8:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/3 "2002-04-22T08:21:34Z")

</div>

Well, as I remember, Chimpanzees and other apes kiss, and I’ve heard it claimed that Chimps also laugh when amused (Maybe the primatologists are able to tell what Chimps think is funny. Don’t ask me to tell.).

There’s an anthropologist named Desmond Morris who’s done research in this area, gitfiddle. You may want to look him up. 'Could be of some use to you.  
Ranchoth

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bromley](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4da419/32.png) [@Bromley](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bromley)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 11:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/4 "2002-04-22T11:12:41Z")

</div>

1. Kissing. I can’t support this with a link, but I saw a program on Discovery that said that kissing was derived from baby feeding. Apparently, granny used to (and still does in some parts of the world) chew up the food and transfer it directly to the child.

Therefore, we have a subconscious association between touching lip-to-lip and pleasure/contentment/love.

It didn’t say anything about tongues, though 🙂 .

1. Hand shaking. I’d go with strength testing/look I’m unarmed/look, I trust you enough to get really close/I’m bonding myself (briefly) to you/etc…

2. Laughing. No idea. Maybe it comes from an explosive release of tension when fear passes?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Balor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/45deac/32.png) [@Balor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Balor)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/5 "2002-04-22T13:54:07Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Ranchoth \*  
> \*\* I’ve heard it claimed that Chimps also laugh when amused (Maybe the primatologists are able to tell what Chimps think is funny. Don’t ask me to tell.) \*\*

Chimps do not laugh in the way we do. In fact, if you see a film of a primate which appears to be laughing, it is probably scared sh##less. Showing teeth is usually an aggressive/defensive thing, not at all amusing for them. If you want to make friends with a non-human primate, keep your mouth closed and don’t show your teeth, even in a smile.

Most mammals nuzzle their young with their mouths, and primates often do this while grooming friends and relations. It is easy to see how this might develop into kissing of our kind. Indeed, the best sexual foreplay starts with a lot of kissing all over the body, not mouth kissing.

I generally agree with Bromley about hand shaking. However, outside USA handshakes are rarely competitive or strength testing. That is a localised thing in parts of the US. Elsewhere, such a handshake is seen as ill-mannered, unfriendly and even aggressive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Border](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ecae2f/32.png) [@Border](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Border)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 2:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/6 "2002-04-22T14:29:57Z")

</div>

I reckon the first kiss was given by a lusty young male it being a very convenient way of stifling any possible objection to what he intended to do next.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Amfet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/49beb7/32.png) [@Amfet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Amfet)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 2:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/7 "2002-04-22T14:58:32Z")

</div>

Not sure I believe this but here’s what I’ve heard; way back when kissing was used as a sort of health inspection for prospective mates. Positioning your mouths and noses as close as they are when kissing you can sniff out diseases and such. Of course if you get that close to them might as well go ahead and mate cause nobody else is gonna want to since you probably just contracted whatever illness they may have had 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Border](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ecae2f/32.png) [@Border](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Border)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/8 "2002-04-22T16:21:17Z")

</div>

And (please see my post above) perhaps the first laugh was when she saw what he was threatening her with.

And then the first shaking of hands occurred when they agreed not to bother.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cainxinth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7bcc69/32.png) [@cainxinth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cainxinth)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/9 "2002-04-22T17:05:48Z")

</div>

I caught a discovery channel program once about human behaviors that chimps exhibit, or more correctly, chimp behaviors humans exhibit. Chimps have very complex social lives, mothers have very strong connections with their children who they often kiss and hug. I don’t recall if laughing was covered, but I believe I’ve seen a chimp laugh before, but it might have been an actor monkey prompted to do so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dbygawdcapn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dbygawdcapn/32/3995_2.png) [@dbygawdcapn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dbygawdcapn)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/10 "2002-04-22T17:16:42Z")

</div>

The kiss originated when the first male reptile licked the first female reptile, implying in a subtle yet complimentary way that she was as succulent as the small reptile he had for dinner the night before. - F.S. Fitzgerald

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rocket](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e79b87/32.png) [@Rocket](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rocket)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/11 "2002-04-22T18:06:59Z")

</div>

I think it is in “The Human Zoo” by Desmond Morris, or if not “The Naked Ape” by same, where there is a discussion of the evolution of the kiss refering to the baby food explanation. If I remember correctly, he states that this behavior still exists today in areas where there is not a market on every corner. Funny how we forget the origin of things when they are mass produced and marketed as a convenience. Instead of “Gerber”, they should’ve called it “Mama’s Kiss”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lamia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/8e7dd6/32.png) [@Lamia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lamia)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2002, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/12 "2002-04-22T19:29:50Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Badtz Maru \*  
> **I read a novel set in Japan during the Tokugawa Shogunate and it claimed that kissing was unknown until introduced by Westerners.**

I have heard this before too, but I don’t know if it’s really true or not. I do know that the Japanese today do not kiss as casually as Westerners, but there could be a variety of reasons for that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fish\_in\_the\_sky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7ba0ec/32.png) [@fish\_in\_the\_sky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fish_in_the_sky)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2002, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/13 "2002-04-23T00:02:25Z")

</div>

I just listened to a program on NPR not too long ago that did a show about laughing.

[Here it is](http://www.wpr.org/book/020407b.htm) To the Best of Our Knowledge, April 7, 2002.

At one point (in segment 1, maybe) it was concluded that the sound of laughter is derived from the labored breathing of play.

As for kissing, I’ve also heard the feeding-baby theory.

And shaking hands, I believe, is a way of showing the other person that you are unarmed.

(I’ve got no cite for the last two, though, it’s just Things I’ve Heard)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2002, 2:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/evolution-of-kissing-shaking-hands-laughing/104952/14 "2002-04-23T02:16:48Z")

</div>

There was another thread about laughter last week. However, given that it had a total of 2 posts (the original and one by yours truely), I’ll restate parts of what I said previously:

Cecil gave a brief, non-evolutionary, description of laughter [here.](http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_326.html) It’s not particularly helpful, though; it’s more of an extended wisecrack than anything else.

Robert Provine provides this explanation:

> [@](#):
>
> AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE  
> We believe laughter evolved from the panting behavior of our ancient primate ancestors. Today, if we tickle chimps or gorillas, they don’t laugh “ha ha ha” but exhibit a panting sound. That’s the sound of ape laughter. And it’s the root of human laughter.  
> Apes laugh in conditions in which human laughter is produced, like tickle, rough and tumble play, and chasing games. …  
> When we laugh, we’re often communicating playful intent. So **laughter has a bonding function within individuals in a group.** It’s often positive, but it can be negative too. There’s a difference between “laughing with” and “laughing at.” People who laugh at others may be trying to force them to conform or casting them out of the group.

From [http://msnbc.com/news/273621.asp?cp1=1#BODY](http://msnbc.com/news/273621.asp?cp1=1#BODY) . Emphasis added.

Robert Provine expanded on his hypotheses in [the American Scientist (1996)](http://www.amsci.org/amsci/Articles/96articles/Provine-R.html) . How Things Work addresses the issue[here](http://www.howstuffworks.com/laughter2.htm) and briefly cites a range of opinions on the issue.
