# Ex-president terminology

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ex-president-terminology/249882>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 11, 2004, 9:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ex-president-terminology/249882 "2004-06-11T21:36:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sunfish](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/96bed5/32.png) [@sunfish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sunfish)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 1:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ex-president-terminology/249882/21 "2004-06-12T13:18:47Z")

</div>

Okay, upon re-reading I think I need to modify a bit what I wrote earlier. Here’s what the _CMS_ (section 7.15) actually says:

> [@](#):
>
> Civil, military, religious, and professional titles and titles of nobility are capitalized when they immediately precede a personal name, as part of the name:
> 
> President Buchanan  
> Cardinal Newman  
> General Eisenhower  
> Prince Charles
> 
> \<snip\>
> 
> Note that when such titles are used in apposition to a name they are not part of the name and so are lowercased:
> 
> the emperor Maximilian (i.e., the emperor who was Maximilian)  
> French president François Mitterand (_better:_ President François Mitterand of France

So it would seem that in _CMS_ style, one _would_ refer correctly to “Prime Minister Blair,” but you would still say “British prime minister Tony Blair.” In the first case, “prime minister” is a title and capitalized as such.

It goes on to add:

> [@](#):
>
> [Sections 7.17-7.18]In text matter, titles following a personal name or used alone in place of a name are, with few exceptions, lowercased.
> 
> \<snip\>[e.g.] Frederick Lord North, prime minister of England; Lord North; the prime minister of England; the North ministry
> 
> \<snip\>
> 
> [Section 7.23] For sake of clarity, or perhaps unbreakable tradition, some British titles are capitalized when used without a personal name:
> 
> Prince of Wales  
> Princess Royal  
> Queen Mother  
> Dame of Sark
> 
> _but:_ prince consort
> 
> British usage favors a more liberal use of capitals for titles than that recommended above.

And I guess in at least one case, a more liberal use of no capitals. 😉

Having a quick look around, it appears that both [India](http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/comp//articleshow/688163.cms) and [Australia](http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/11/1086749902682.html?from=storylhs) use PM as a title.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 1:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ex-president-terminology/249882/22 "2004-06-12T13:37:39Z")

</div>

The only other British style guide I can find is that of the Times (far more conservative than the Guardian):

> [@](#):
>
> President (of any country, also President of the European Commission), cap at first and all subsequent mentions when used as a variation for a specific person, eg, "George W. Bush said that … the President said that … "; “Richard Nixon was the President until 1974”. Lower case when using president more generally, eg, “Richard Nixon was the 37th president of the United States”…
> 
> Prime Minister cap for every country, but only in reference to a specific person, eg, "Tony Blair said that … the Prime Minister said that … "; “Margaret Thatcher was the Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990”. Thus lower case when using prime minister more generally, eg, “Being prime minister has affected many men’s health”; “This is a prime minister with much still to prove”. …

…which, as far as I can see, is actually more caps-happy than the CMS, giving us “British Prime Minister Tony Blair”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ex-president-terminology/249882/23 "2004-06-12T13:38:58Z")

</div>

Oh, here’s the link: [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2941-576,00.html](http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2941-576,00.html)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ex-president-terminology/249882.md?page=1)
