Actually I have been schooled and have a accredited degree to do exactly that, though I really didn’t chose to pursue that line. What I did discover is in that particular issue: 1 is way too large for any single person to accomplish themselves or verify themselves, and very very sadly 2 the issue is way too political and economic to trust conclusions to any degree of certainty.
Going into homeopathy, the belief basically stems from all healing is from love (and Love is God & God heals), not from the ‘active ingredient’. This healing by Love has been the basis of early medicine for man and still practiced today in mom’s chicken soup. My own personal experience and much to my amazement was with a sore throat. I prayed and was guided to pick up a homeopathic remedy in a supermarket - I didn’t even know that supermarkets had them. I read the ingredients, mostly salt water with perhaps 0% chance of a active ingredient molecule in it. I felt that my prayers answer may be wrong so I put it back but was lead back to it. So I ended up buying it, taking it and 30 minutes later the sour throat was gone totally.
The problem with medical practice of double blind studies is that love, which is the real healer, is not accounted for and like Jesus said the blind leading the blind both will fall into the pit.