# "Eye" didn't see this

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [February 7, 2013, 4:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554 "2013-02-07T04:25:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spiderman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spiderman/32/230_2.png) [@Spiderman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spiderman)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 4:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/1 "2013-02-07T04:25:11Z")

</div>

[Eyeball falls out in court, mistrial declared](http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20130206_Eyeball_falls_out_in_court__mistrial_declared.html)

> [@](#):
>
> Huttick, 48, was on the witness stand Wednesday, weeping as he told the Common Pleas Court jury about the impact of losing an eye when he literally lost his eye.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nunzio\_Tavulari](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/b9bd4f/32.png) [@Nunzio\_Tavulari](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nunzio_Tavulari)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 4:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/2 "2013-02-07T04:35:57Z")

</div>

I bet the jury didn’t see that coming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![picker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/picker/32/13969_2.png) [@picker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/picker)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 4:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/3 "2013-02-07T04:37:40Z")

</div>

Must’ve been quite a sight to see. Were there many eyewitnesses?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnut](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnut/32/3531_2.png) [@carnut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnut)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 4:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/4 "2013-02-07T04:39:05Z")

</div>

Seeing is believing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ethilrist](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ethilrist/32/4604_2.png) [@Ethilrist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ethilrist)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 4:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/5 "2013-02-07T04:49:02Z")

</div>

Well, if it gets to a jury vote, the eyes will have it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/96bed5/32.png) [@Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Patty_O_Furniture)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 12:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/6 "2013-02-07T12:56:06Z")

</div>

Wood eye? WOOD EYE?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gotpasswords](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/c57346/32.png) [@gotpasswords](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gotpasswords)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 1:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/7 "2013-02-07T13:03:36Z")

</div>

It’s sad when a grown man loses his marbles on the witness stand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 1:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/8 "2013-02-07T13:15:46Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Coleman set a new trial for March 4 and, with judicial understatement, declared it an “unfortunate, unforeseen incident.”

Heh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/9 "2013-02-07T13:21:22Z")

</div>

Funny, it’s usually the _jurors_ who are glassy-eyed!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jenaroph](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e8c25b/32.png) [@Jenaroph](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jenaroph)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/10 "2013-02-07T17:21:47Z")

</div>

> [@Patty\_O\_Furniture](#):
>
> Wood eye? WOOD EYE?

Hare lip! Hare lip!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rachellelogram](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rachellelogram/32/8689_2.png) [@Rachellelogram](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rachellelogram)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/11 "2013-02-07T19:06:32Z")

</div>

Mistrial? Seriously?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Balance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ccd318/32.png) [@Balance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Balance)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 7:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/12 "2013-02-07T19:19:57Z")

</div>

> [@Rachellelogram](#):
>
> Mistrial? Seriously?

Without digging into court documents, I don’t necessarily know the judge’s reasoning, but I imagine it involved the possibility that the rather vivid demonstration of the injury might bias the jury in the defendant’s favor.

If something happens in court that “taints” the jury–something emotionally affecting, like this incident, or something like a party showing them inadmissible evidence–the court may declare a mistrial to select a new jury pool that hasn’t been subjected to that source of possible bias. If it’s just one or two jurors who have seen something they shouldn’t have, they’re often replaced by alternates, rather than starting over, but that’s not an option with something that happens in open court.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gedd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gedd/32/4938_2.png) [@Gedd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gedd)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/13 "2013-02-07T20:15:08Z")

</div>

You would think they would do a better job fitting those things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![digs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/digs/32/14889_2.png) [@digs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/digs)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/14 "2013-02-07T20:41:04Z")

</div>

> [@Balance](#):
>
> If something happens in court that “taints” the jury–something emotionally affecting, like this incident, or something like a party showing them inadmissible evidence–the court may declare a mistrial to select a new jury pool that hasn’t been subjected to that source of possible bias. If it’s just one or two jurors who have seen something they shouldn’t have, they’re often replaced by alternates, rather than starting over, but that’s not an option with something that happens in open court.

Yeah, since everyone got to eyeball that…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/15 "2013-02-07T21:08:26Z")

</div>

I’m glad it wasn’t a trial about a penile implant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Balance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ccd318/32.png) [@Balance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Balance)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/16 "2013-02-07T21:18:13Z")

</div>

> [@digs](#):
>
> Yeah, since everyone got to eyeball that…

**Rachel** had a legitimate question, however derisively asked, so in the midst of the humour, I chose to focus on that. The courts are supposed to try to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, so a judge must naturally remain aware of the optics of a trial.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QuickSilver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quicksilver/32/7832_2.png) [@QuickSilver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/QuickSilver)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2013, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/17 "2013-02-07T21:19:17Z")

</div>

> [@Annie-Xmas](#):
>
> I’m glad it wasn’t a trial about a penile implant.

Else, penis would ensue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2013, 1:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/18 "2013-02-08T01:19:27Z")

</div>

> [@gotpasswords](#):
>
> It’s sad when a grown man loses his marbles on the witness stand.

That’s what people say.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Toucanna](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3bc359/32.png) [@Toucanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Toucanna)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2013, 8:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/19 "2013-02-08T08:35:21Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Balance]  
**Rachel** had a legitimate question, however derisively asked, so in the midst of the humour, I chose to focus on that. The courts are supposed to try to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, so a judge must naturally remain aware of the optics of a trial.  
[/QUOTE]

Sight?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SciFiSam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/47e85d/32.png) [@SciFiSam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SciFiSam)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2013, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554/20 "2013-02-08T20:53:39Z")

</div>

> [@Balance](#):
>
> Without digging into court documents, I don’t necessarily know the judge’s reasoning, but I imagine it involved the possibility that the rather vivid demonstration of the injury might bias the jury in the defendant’s favor.
> 
> If something happens in court that “taints” the jury–something emotionally affecting, like this incident, or something like a party showing them inadmissible evidence–the court may declare a mistrial to select a new jury pool that hasn’t been subjected to that source of possible bias. If it’s just one or two jurors who have seen something they shouldn’t have, they’re often replaced by alternates, rather than starting over, but that’s not an option with something that happens in open court.

What if it falls out again in the next trial?

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/eye-didnt-see-this/649554.md?page=2)
