I think it is worth noting that the fair market value of a home is not a specific number that the IRS will try to hold you to. It is a price range and as long as you are in the ballpark I do not think the IRS will be fussed.
They are more concerned about people buying a property for $5 or $5 million when it is really worth $50,000.
But if you buy the $50,000 place for $45k or $55k I doubt the government will be fussed. Happens all the time.
After the '08 crash our assessor’s office did lower our assessed value and taxes a bit. And then we refinanced in spring '09, and a professional assessment for that refinance gave an even lower value. So I took that paperwork to the assessor’s review board and asked them to lower their assessment to match, and they did.
That’s a rarity - nice work! I’m of the opinion that the assessor’s office should be required to purchase any home at assessed value if the owner wants to sell it. Maybe at 80% value, even. Bet we start seeing much more realistic assessments.
Most places I’ve lived “assessed value” is a purely BS number 25% - 50% different from market price. It isn’t intended to be an actual buy/sell price.
A bit like the DJIA, it’s all about having a number that goes up and down by the relevant percentages, and is comparable across long timescales. Not about having a number that is connected to buying/selling reality. And unlike the DJIA, it’s intended to fair-share the tax. So two properties both with “assessed value” of $250K will pay the same tax and will pay half the tax of a property with “assessed value” of $500K.