# Faking Agreement

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 28, 2018, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927 "2018-06-28T16:32:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2018, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927/1 "2018-06-28T16:32:57Z")

</div>

What is it called when someone pretends to agree with you using this tactic:

A-"Although plan #1 has a couple good points, I support Plan #2 because it is better.  
B-“I agree with you that plan #1 is the good plan”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tatterdemalion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/43a26b/32.png) [@Tatterdemalion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tatterdemalion)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2018, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927/2 "2018-06-28T16:34:27Z")

</div>

I’m inclined to call it diplomacy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidwithanR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/3bc359/32.png) [@DavidwithanR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidwithanR)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2018, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927/3 "2018-06-28T16:45:49Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> What is it called when someone pretends to agree with you using this tactic:
> 
> A-"Although plan #1 has a couple good points, I support Plan #2 because it is better.  
> B-“I agree with you that plan #1 is the good plan”

Unfortunately, it’s called lying. I don’t think there’s a nice word for it.

Intentional misrepresentation of your point of view, maybe?

But IMO it’s not out of line to call it lying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inigo\_Montoya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inigo_montoya/32/124_2.png) [@Inigo\_Montoya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inigo_Montoya)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2018, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927/4 "2018-06-28T16:49:22Z")

</div>

A: That’s nuts, I don’t agree with that!  
B: Well then, would you agree that Paris is the capital of France?  
A: Um, yes?  
B: Good, then we’re back in agreement. Plan #1 it is!

(adapted from Kids in the Hall)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2018, 5:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927/5 "2018-06-28T17:08:36Z")

</div>

I’d call it “The Reverse Straw Man.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2018, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927/6 "2018-06-28T18:02:33Z")

</div>

I don’t know but **anomalous1** did it to me, at least partially, in the trolls thread. I didn’t bother trying to correct him because clearly he wasn’t interested in what I really said, and other people can read for themselves.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2018, 8:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/faking-agreement/816927/7 "2018-06-28T20:42:00Z")

</div>

There is a bright line distinction between accurate statements that are combined with misdirection and knowingly inaccurate statements. The latter are called lies. Characterizations of the former vary. Regardless, there is a distinction.

As for the OP, I perceived no intent to deceive on a first (and second) reading.  
I would call that tactic railroading, possibly combined with a little bluster. Admittedly, railroading is a more general concept.  
ETA: Better: “Putting words in someone’s mouth.”
