# Famous Scientists with Outlandish Theories

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/famous-scientists-with-outlandish-theories/383368>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [December 8, 2006, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/famous-scientists-with-outlandish-theories/383368 "2006-12-08T17:28:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mathochist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c89c15/32.png) [@Mathochist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mathochist)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2006, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/famous-scientists-with-outlandish-theories/383368/61 "2006-12-11T00:52:23Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=TJdude825]  
I believe Kepler thought the planets’ distances from the sun were based on imaginary polyhedra and spheres nested inside one another.  
[/QUOTE]

You’re thinking of the [_Mysterium Cosmographicum_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysterium_Cosmographicum).

Yes, Kepler proposed this model at first, but withdrew it when he discovered what we now call Kepler’s Laws, which state that planetary orbits are ellipses. I think we specifically can’t count a hypothesis here if the scientist in question abandons it in light of evidence. That’s how the scientific method works. This example is actually a particularly good parallel to string theory.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alive\_At\_Both\_Ends](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/73ab20/32.png) [@Alive\_At\_Both\_Ends](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alive_At_Both_Ends)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2006, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/famous-scientists-with-outlandish-theories/383368/62 "2006-12-11T00:57:48Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=TJdude825]  
I think Einstein’s idea that the passage of time and the length of objects can change depending on your point of view is rather outlandish, as are invisible rays that arise from electric and magnetic fields, and can carry energy and information. They just both happen to be right.  
[/QUOTE]

Nitpick: The bit about the length of objects changing wasn’t Einstein’s idea, it was proposed by Hendrik Lorentz and George Fitzgerald in 1904, a year before Einstein picked up the idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yabob](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yabob/32/2821_2.png) [@yabob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yabob)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2006, 1:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/famous-scientists-with-outlandish-theories/383368/63 "2006-12-11T01:21:59Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mathochist]  
You’re thinking of the [_Mysterium Cosmographicum_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysterium_Cosmographicum).

Yes, Kepler proposed this model at first, but withdrew it when he discovered what we now call Kepler’s Laws, which state that planetary orbits are ellipses. I think we specifically can’t count a hypothesis here if the scientist in question abandons it in light of evidence. That’s how the scientific method works. This example is actually a particularly good parallel to string theory.  
[/QUOTE]

Kepler did, however, hang on to the notion of “The Music of The Spheres”, believing planetary motions to correspond to musical harmonies. He published “Harmonice Mundi” after having formulated the first two laws of planetary motion in “Astronomia nova” 10 years earlier, and presented the third in that work, intertwined with a bunch of Astrology:

> **[Harmonice Mundi](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonice_Mundi)**
>
> Harmonice Mundi (Latin: The Harmony of the World, 1619) is a book by Johannes Kepler. In the work, written entirely in Latin, Kepler discusses harmony and congruence in geometrical forms and physical phenomena. The final section of the work relates his discovery of the so-called third law of planetary motion. The full title is Harmonices mundi libri V (The Five Books of The Harmony of the World), which is commonly but ungrammatically shortened to Harmonices mundi. Kepler began working on Harmo...

Kepler remained a Pythagorian mystic and Astrologer. Astrology and Astronomy weren’t really clearly separated in his era. Kepler firmly believed that the motions of the heavens influenced human affairs, and he was trying to unravel exactly how it worked.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/famous-scientists-with-outlandish-theories/383368.md?page=3)
