# Fargo S1E7 \[Open spoilers\]

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [May 28, 2014, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428 "2014-05-28T02:15:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flander](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8c91f0/32.png) [@Flander](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Flander)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/21 "2014-05-29T00:57:48Z")

</div>

So I’m going to guess that Chaz has a pretty good alibi the night of the murders? I hope this comes up. Lester may think he’s got things wrapped up but he’s not thinking far enough ahead.

I cheered when he banged the wife though! Ol’ Lester Smooth! (why yes, I love\* The Wire\*)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 1:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/22 "2014-05-29T01:01:17Z")

</div>

I’m just now noticing that most (all?) of the episode titles represent paradoxes or parables or the like. The last one was [Burridan’s ass](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buridan%27s_ass), this one referred to the [barber paradox](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barber_paradox) and so forth. And usually the scenes from previous episodes are introduced with something like “Previously on Fargo . . .” but here they play with that a little. In last week’s episode they said “Erstwhile on Fargo . . .”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 1:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/23 "2014-05-29T01:06:59Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> I’m just now noticing that most (all?) of the episode titles represent paradoxes or parables or the like. The last one was [Burridan’s ass](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buridan%27s_ass), this one referred to the [barber paradox](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barber_paradox) and so forth. And usually the scenes from previous episodes are introduced with something like “Previously on Fargo . . .” but here they play with that a little. In last week’s episode they said “Erstwhile on Fargo . . .”.

I think they used “Erstwhile” twice. I had to flip on CC to hear what they were saying. Last night it was “precedently”. (Pre-SEE-dent-ly)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PastTense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pasttense/32/14550_2.png) [@PastTense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PastTense)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 1:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/24 "2014-05-29T01:37:14Z")

</div>

I doubt if it was a good idea to bang the widow: 1. The insurance agency will fire him when the widow finds out and complains. 2. The two sons are not people Lester would want to mess with–and if the widow tells them something that makes them angry toward Lester very bad things could happen to him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 1:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/25 "2014-05-29T01:39:53Z")

</div>

> [@PastTense](#):
>
> I doubt if it was a good idea to bang the widow: 1. The insurance agency will fire him when the widow finds out and complains. 2. The two sons are not people Lester would want to mess with–and if the widow tells them something that makes them angry toward Lester very bad things could happen to him.

Lester seems pretty good at handling himself in tough situations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Raza](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/raza/32/213_2.png) [@Raza](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Raza)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 1:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/26 "2014-05-29T01:46:28Z")

</div>

The cops getting a search warrant because the kid brought a gun to school is unrealistic on its face (and I like how the chief says something along the lines of “these days”, as in a kid with a gun at school wouldn’t have been a big deal in the past), but I can fanwank this scenario not shown to the viewers:

Cops called to school, ask kid where he got gun. Kid replies: “It looks like one of my dad’s guns. He has lots of guns. He has a big cabinet in the garage with lots and lots of them, and a big one he calls a machine gun.”

I think that’s a realistic scenario, and had I been a cop at that interview, I’d be inclined to procure a search warrant, too. Especially if the kid repeated that his dad told him he keeps _that one_ hidden because it’s special (not saying they presented that conversation, but it wouldn’t be unreasonable for dad to explain to his son given that dad’s special toy is either stolen and/or an unregistered Class III weapon).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 1:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/27 "2014-05-29T01:51:21Z")

</div>

> [@Raza](#):
>
> Cops called to school, ask kid where he got gun. Kid replies: “It looks like one of my dad’s guns. He has lots of guns. He has a big cabinet in the garage with lots and lots of them, and a big one he calls a machine gun.”
> 
> I think that’s a realistic scenario, and had I been a cop at that interview, I’d be inclined to procure a search warrant, too. Especially if the kid repeated that his dad told him he keeps _that one_ hidden because it’s special (not saying they presented that conversation, but it wouldn’t be unreasonable for dad to explain to his son given that dad’s special toy is either stolen and/or an unregistered Class III weapon).

I’ll give that to you on a fanwank, but that’s about it. Like I said earlier, I think they could have either found a better way to have the cops search the house or have them find the evidence.  
If Lester had just told them how Chaz killed his wife with a hammer that might have been enough to do it.

But I suppose this is supposed to be taking place in a slightly altered reality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 2:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/28 "2014-05-29T02:12:27Z")

</div>

> [@Joey\_P](#):
>
> Lester seems pretty good at handling himself in tough situations.

Amazingly, unbelievably good.

In fact, the authors have really stretched reality here so that in the beginning, we think of Lester as a pathetic loser who can’t stand up for himself. But now, we think of him as a real slick criminal mastermind.

Obviously, this stretches reality past the breaking point. But, once again, I don’t mind.

Why not?

Because it makes the story superbly exciting and fun to watch. This has to make for a very unique kind of TV show that, on the one hand stretches reality past the breaking point. But, on the other hand, is a real success at creating a fun and exciting program. AFAIC, the showrunners have a real success on their hands here. I like it a whole lot!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 2:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/29 "2014-05-29T02:32:57Z")

</div>

> [@Charlie\_Wayne](#):
>
> Amazingly, unbelievably good.
> 
> In fact, the authors have really stretched reality here so that in the beginning, we think of Lester as a pathetic loser who can’t stand up for himself. But now, we think of him as a real slick criminal mastermind.
> 
> Obviously, this stretches reality past the breaking point. But, once again, I don’t mind.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> Because it makes the story superbly exciting and fun to watch. This has to make for a very unique kind of TV show that, on the one hand stretches reality past the breaking point. But, on the other hand, is a real success at creating a fun and exciting program. AFAIC, the showrunners have a real success on their hands here. I like it a whole lot!

I don’t think I’d call him a real slick criminal mastermind. He got in over his head and now he’s weaseling his way out of it. He’s quick on his feet and with the help of some creative writers and time dilation he’s managed to stall the cops for a while until they can sort out the hammer thing, but he’s not robbing casinos just yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flander](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8c91f0/32.png) [@Flander](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Flander)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 3:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/30 "2014-05-29T03:52:31Z")

</div>

> [@Charlie\_Wayne](#):
>
> _snip_
> 
> In fact, the authors have really stretched reality here so that in the beginning, we think of Lester as a pathetic loser who can’t stand up for himself. But now, we think of him as a real slick criminal mastermind.  
> _snip_!

I don’t think it’s the authors’ intention to tell us that Lester is a mastermind. We WANT him to be after we, as an audience, have seen shows like Breaking Bad where there is a long con going because the protagonist is capable of it. But Lester, while not stupid, is still only making what he feels is the best of a particular situation. He’s taking advantage of the fact that he knows the police see him as a pushover person with no courage. Ironically, the police are the same way; no one has the courage to look for the real truth. Of course besides our two protagonists.

It will be a battle of which side decides to say “fuck it” and go gung ho; the police decide to ACTUALLY do police work or Lester goes full Malvo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 4:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/31 "2014-05-29T04:10:44Z")

</div>

> [@Flander](#):
>
> I don’t think it’s the authors’ intention to tell us that Lester is a mastermind. We WANT him to be after we, as an audience, have seen shows like Breaking Bad where there is a long con going because the protagonist is capable of it. But Lester, while not stupid, is still only making what he feels is the best of a particular situation. He’s taking advantage of the fact that he knows the police see him as a pushover person with no courage. Ironically, the police are the same way; no one has the courage to look for the real truth. Of course besides our two protagonists.
> 
> It will be a battle of which side decides to say “fuck it” and go gung ho; the police decide to ACTUALLY do police work or Lester goes full Malvo.

If that is true (and I think there is probably a good reason to expect that it’s true), then considering how the showrunners stretch reality as much as they do, this show will probably end in a wild (think of the Wild West) finish with luck maybe playing a lot to do with who comes out on top and the end result should be one whole Hell of a lot of fun.

That strikes me as just the perfect way for this show to end. Wouldn’t that be wonderful?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flander](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8c91f0/32.png) [@Flander](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Flander)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 4:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/32 "2014-05-29T04:28:26Z")

</div>

The comedy they could right on this would be genius! The only people that have a handle on things are Malvo and Molly. Everyone else is either catching up or too dumb to listen. The half-wits trying to battle each other could be fantastic. Lester included.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C_K_Dexter_Haven)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 11:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/33 "2014-05-29T11:23:36Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> I’m just now noticing that most (all?) of the episode titles represent paradoxes or parables or the like. The last one was [Burridan’s ass](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buridan%27s_ass), this one referred to the [barber paradox](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barber_paradox) and so forth. And usually the scenes from previous episodes are introduced with something like “Previously on Fargo . . .” but here they play with that a little. In last week’s episode they said “Erstwhile on Fargo . . .”.

Great noticing! “The Barber paradox” was the first one I noticed, but I didn’t put 'em together.  
Episode 1 - [“The Crocodile Dilemma”](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crocodile_Paradox)  
Ep 2 - [“The Rooster Prince”](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rooster_Prince) isn’t so much a dilemma/paradox as a fable  
Ep 3 - “The Muddy Road” – no paradox as far as I can see  
Ep 4 - “Eating the Blame” - ?? Dunno this one  
Ep 5 - [“The six ungraspables”](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_koans_by_Yunmen_Wenyan) seems to be a Zen koan: “What is the reality?” “The six ungraspables.” (The graspables are the five sense and the intellect)  
Ep 6 - “Who shaves the barber” as noted by **Dewey** is the famous paradox of the barber shaves everyone who doesn’t shave themselves.  
COMING (According to Wikipedia):  
Ep 7 - ["The Heap](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heap_paradox) also called “sorites paradox”  
Ep 8 - “The Fox, the Rabbit, and the Cabbage” is presumably not a paradox per se, but the age-old puzzle-riddle of trying to get all three across a stream in a boat that only holds two (plus you), so that the fox doesn’t eat the rabbit (if left alone together on either shore) and the rabbit doesn’t eat the cabbage (if left alone together on either shore) and the cabbage doesn’t eat… um. Yeah.  
Ep 9 - [“Morton’s Fork”](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton%27s_fork) is a version of “heads I win, tails you lose.”

Cooool!  
PS - I both hate and love Wikipedia.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Lowry](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e95f7d/32.png) [@Sam\_Lowry](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Lowry)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 1:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/34 "2014-05-29T13:55:05Z")

</div>

> [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](#):
>
> Ep 3 - “The Muddy Road” – no paradox as far as I can see  
> Ep 4 - “Eating the Blame” - ?? Dunno this one

[Both are zen parables](http://www.pajiba.com/tv_reviews/a-guide-to-the-episodes-titles-on-fxs-fargo-.php).

Muddy Road:

> [@](#):
>
> Tanzan and Ekido were once traveling together down a muddy road. A heavy rain was still falling.
> 
> Coming around a bend, they met a lovely girl in a silk kimono and sash, unable to cross the intersection.
> 
> “Come on, girl” said Tanzan at once. Lifting her in his arms, he carried her over the mud.
> 
> Ekido did not speak again until that night when they reached a lodging temple. Then he no longer could restrain himself. “We monks don’t go near females,” he told Tanzan, “especially not young and lovely ones. It is dangerous. Why did you do that?”
> 
> “I left the girl there,” said Tanzan. “Are you still carrying her?”

Eating the Blame:

> [@](#):
>
> Circumstances arose one day which delayed preparation of the dinner of a Soto Zen master, Fugai, and his followers. In haste the cook went to the garden with his curved knife and cut off the tops of green vegetables, chopped them together, and made soup, unaware that in his haste he had included a part of a snake in the vegetables.  
> The followers of Fugai thought they had never tasted such great soup. But when the master himself found the snake’s head in his bowl, he summoned the cook. “What is this?” he demanded, holding up the head of the snake.
> 
> “Oh, thank you, master,” replied the cook, taking the morsel and eating it quickly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sauron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce7236/32.png) [@Sauron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sauron)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 2:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/35 "2014-05-29T14:50:33Z")

</div>

I loved the scene with Malvo and the Rundle Realty guy, and particularly the exchange:

Malvo: Two hombres took a run at me in Duluth.

Rundle guy: Mexicans?

Malvo: You’re focusing on the wrong part of that sentence.

I never would have cast Billy Bob Thornton as a stone-cold killer, but his low-key and menacing approach tickles me no end.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PastTense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pasttense/32/14550_2.png) [@PastTense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PastTense)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 4:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/36 "2014-05-29T16:15:22Z")

</div>

What exactly happened at Rundle Realty? Did he kill everyone, just the head guy or…?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sauron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce7236/32.png) [@Sauron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sauron)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/37 "2014-05-29T16:18:33Z")

</div>

> [@PastTense](#):
>
> What exactly happened at Rundle Realty? Did he kill everyone, just the head guy or…?

My interpretation is he either killed or seriously hurt the head guy. Everybody else was fine (hence the scream after he left the building - one of the women found his victim).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TruCelt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/trucelt/32/523_2.png) [@TruCelt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TruCelt)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/38 "2014-05-29T17:31:12Z")

</div>

So, btw, curiosity killed the Celt, and I know I’ll regret this, but, what is a “Bemumpkin” or whatever? You know, from Chaz’s story with the dancer?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TonySinclair](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/49beb7/32.png) [@TonySinclair](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TonySinclair)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 6:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/39 "2014-05-29T18:20:11Z")

</div>

> [@PastTense](#):
>
> What exactly happened at Rundle Realty? Did he kill everyone, just the head guy or…?

WTF was Rundle Realty, anyway? Why was a guy who evidently was the coordinator for a nationwide network of hitmen working in a shabby strip mall office with zero security?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_Wayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/4bbf92/32.png) [@Charlie\_Wayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Charlie_Wayne)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2014, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428/40 "2014-05-29T18:34:07Z")

</div>

> [@Sauron](#):
>
> \<snip\>  
> I never would have cast Billy Bob Thornton as a stone-cold killer, but his low-key and menacing approach tickles me no end.

IMHO, BBT is one of the most talented and one of the most underrated actors working today.

If you have never heard of the movie One False Move (1992), I would like to recommend it to you.

> **[One False Move (1991) ⭐ 7.1 | Crime, Drama, Thriller](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102592/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_67)**
>
> 1h 45m | R

It’s a low budget movie but it was great. It stars BBT, Bill Paxton, Michael Beach and others. Remember Michael Beach? Remember Third Watch? You wouldn’t recognize him in this movie if I didn’t tell you it was him.

If you ever get a chance, this is an excellent movie.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fargo-s1e7-open-spoilers/689428.md?page=3)
