# Farthest inland you can get with a boat **URL:** \ **Category:** Factual Questions\ **Created:** [May 27, 2016, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/farthest-inland-you-can-get-with-a-boat/755782 "2016-05-27T01:58:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![MikeS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/919ad9/32.png) [@MikeS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MikeS)\ **Post date:** [May 27, 2016, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/farthest-inland-you-can-get-with-a-boat/755782/21 "2016-05-27T18:29:23Z")
> [@kurtisokc](#): > > I was under the impression that the Missouri is navigable by barge traffic as far upstream as Sioux City, but I could be wrong. In any case, it appears that under the OP’s guidelines the Gavins Point Dam in Yankton, SD is the absolute upper limit for the Missouri, since AFAIK it lacks navigation locks and would therefore require a portage to get around. However, according to the Wikipedia article the section of the river immediately downstream from that point is unchannelized, so it may be difficult to reach that far in anything much larger than a canoe. Most of the Missouri between Sioux City and the Fort Randall Dam (the next one upstream from Gavins Point) forms the [Missouri National Recreational River.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_National_Recreational_River)[The website for the MNRR](https://www.nps.gov/mnrr/planyourvisit/boating-in-the-mnrr.htm) implies that shallow-draft boats can navigate in this stretch of river, but it’s tricky. ---
**Author:** ![Disheavel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e274bd/32.png) [@Disheavel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Disheavel)\ **Post date:** [May 27, 2016, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/farthest-inland-you-can-get-with-a-boat/755782/22 "2016-05-27T18:37:56Z")
> [@kurtisokc](#): > > I was under the impression that the Missouri is navigable by barge traffic as far upstream as Sioux City, but I could be wrong. In any case, it appears that under the OP’s guidelines the Gavins Point Dam in Yankton, SD is the absolute upper limit for the Missouri, since AFAIK it lacks navigation locks and would therefore require a portage to get around. However, according to the Wikipedia article the section of the river immediately downstream from that point is unchannelized, so it may be difficult to reach that far in anything much larger than a canoe. You can definitely motorboat from Sioux City to Gavins Point Dam, you are going to want to be planing and watching for snags and sandbars, but it is absolutely possible. Source: I’ve drifted down from Gavins Point to Sioux City several times. However, I think you could get further inland than Gavins Point dam by canoeing up the Big Sioux River or up the Jim (James) River. I’m not very familiar with the Big Sioux River and I know that getting through the Falls in Sioux Falls is going to require a portage. But I know that you could powerboat to highway 81 north of Yankton and paddle easily to Olivet, SD and in some years paddling up to and past Mitchell would be possible (not fun but possible). So I put forward Olivet, SD as the furthest inland one could get solely on a boat up the Missouri River route. And now I found a blog which goes from [Mitchell](http://southdakotakayak.blogspot.com/2008/08/james-river-south-from-mitchell.html) (not down to Olivet but the river looks to be substantial enough). Just watch out for cows in the water (not joking). ---
**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\ **Post date:** [May 27, 2016, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/farthest-inland-you-can-get-with-a-boat/755782/23 "2016-05-27T18:38:09Z")
You can certainly navigate the Missouri via recreational power boat at its headwaters and somewhat above in the three tributaries (which are also unchannelized), and it’d be surprising if it were less navigable anywhere below that. ---
**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\ **Post date:** [May 27, 2016, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/farthest-inland-you-can-get-with-a-boat/755782/24 "2016-05-27T21:01:19Z")
> [@JKellyMap](#): > > Just to clarify, lisiate mentioned St. Paul and Omaha because they’re the “heads of navigation” for the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers – that is, the furthest you can get in a _biggish_ boat. For most passenger or commercial cargo purposes, that’s where you’d have to change to a ground-based transportation type, which is why those two cities developed at those places. I stand corrected (by several of you) – for most purposes, especially historically, Sioux, City, Iowa is the head of navigation on the Missouri, the functional equivalent of St. Paul, Minnesota. Sioux City is a bout a hundred miles upstream from Omaha. (Omaha grew into a city mainly due to its proximity to where the Missouri and Platte Rivers meet – the Platte valley has been an important overland route to the west since the Oregon Trail days). [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/farthest-inland-you-can-get-with-a-boat/755782.md?page=1)