# FBI Search and Seizure at Trump's Mar-A-Lago Residence, August 8, 2022, Case Dismissed July 15, 2024

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Tags:** trump\
**Created:** [August 8, 2022, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329 "2022-08-08T23:18:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 399

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lance\_Turbo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lance_turbo/32/6156_2.png) [@Lance\_Turbo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lance_Turbo)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2024, 10:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7986 "2024-04-05T22:22:41Z")

</div>

Even if it’s your car that does not give you free rein to hide documents that are responsive to a subpoena, destroy evidence of you hiding those documents, and trick your lawyer into signing a false statement that you have complied with the subpoena. Those are crimes no matter who owns the car.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2024, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7987 "2024-04-05T22:23:40Z")

</div>

It wouldn’t be me who needs to be reminded of that. It would be Aileen Cannon 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/horatius/32/3572_2.png) [@Horatius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatius)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2024, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7988 "2024-04-05T22:35:49Z")

</div>

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> If you think I stole your car, and my defense is that it’s not _your_ car, it’s mine, then you have to wonder how far that argument would go in explaining and doing away with any ‘bad behavior’ on my part in avoiding turning the car over to you at _any step along the way_ if and when I convince the trier of fact that it actually _was_ my car to begin with.

But here’s the thing…Even if it’s your car, and I’m just an asshole trying to steal it from you using the police and courts, doing what Trump did would still be crimes.

The police show up to your door, “Excuse me, we have reports that you have a stolen 1983 Mazda in your garage, can we take a look”?

“What are you talking about? I don’t have any cars in my garage, in fact, I don’t even _own_ a car!”

“Okay, fine, we’ll come back with a warrant to search your garage for cars.”

“Fine, whatever.” _\>Calls George down the block\<_ “Hey, George, I need you to come to my place, and drive my 1983 Mazda a couple of blocks away, the cops are looking for it.”

Those are still crimes. You’re deliberately interfering with a police investigation, and hiding evidence. That the investigation would have cleared you if you’d not lied and deceived the cops is irrelevant. You’re still making the cops jump through hoops, and delaying the day they find out that _ **I’m** _ actually the real criminal here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2024, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7989 "2024-04-05T22:41:19Z")

</div>

May I respectfully refer you to **[post #7987](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022/969329/7987)** 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/horatius/32/3572_2.png) [@Horatius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatius)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2024, 10:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7990 "2024-04-05T22:43:01Z")

</div>

Oh sure, post while I’m typing. That’s a crime too!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2024, 2:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7991 "2024-04-06T02:33:07Z")

</div>

> [@Lance\_Turbo](#):
>
> There is no part of 793 that applies to Joe Biden which is why he wasn’t charged.

You are a smart, well-informed person. On this board, your readers include equally smart, well-informed people. You know the above is true, and we do as well.

The problem is trusting the greater mass of the idiot public to understand the distinction based on the information they’re receiving from the idiot media.

And the narrative there is basically “Trump had hisself some sekrit papers and so did Biden, hur hurr, what a co nun drum we got here.”

I don’t know how we batter down the wall of stupidity and ignorance and get people to fully grasp that Trump is not on trial for accidentally, or even negligently, stuffing some classified material into a packing box at the eleventh hour, like dozens of equivalent politicians and bureaucrats before him. Until that happens, though, the facts are largely immaterial in the court of public opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2024, 2:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7992 "2024-04-06T02:40:42Z")

</div>

> [@Cervaise](#):
>
> “Trump had hisself some sekrit papers and so did Biden, **hur hurr** , what a co nun drum we got here.”

[bolding mine]

ISWYDT.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2024, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7993 "2024-04-06T19:40:18Z")

</div>

Every document that was stolen is considered compromised. Or better be.

Trump ADMIRES Putin and Kim Jong Un, and will do anything to get into an ‘inner circle’ and will do anything for a buck. Some of those documents where stored in a **bathroom with a copy machine** , which is, of course, where anyone would keep boxes of top secret documents /s

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2024, 8:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7994 "2024-04-06T20:46:19Z")

</div>

> [@Lance\_Turbo](#):
>
> Biden didn’t do any of the things Trump is charged with.
> 
> Trump is charged retaining and failing to deliver national defense documents under [US code 793](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793)e.

Excellent post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7995 "2024-04-07T00:37:50Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Yeah, this is a criminal case, not civil. He could try for a plea bargain, but there’s no reason for the government to accept one.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Even if you could get a plea bargain past Trump’s ego, what would be in it for the government? Usually, when the government settles for a plea bargain, it’s because the case isn’t worth wasting time on, possibly because it’s just some small fry and they want to focus on the big guy. But Trump is the big guy, and he’s worth all the resources we can bring to bear on him.

Every prosecution is a gamble. There is always a possibility of an acquittal, or a dismissal, no matter how strong the evidence might appear.

A plea bargain is a sure thing. It makes absolutely certain of a conviction, even if its a lesser charge.

The prosecution of Trump could yet fail. This is a trial with an inexperienced judge who has made a number of legally dubious rulings that have been in the defendant’s favour. She might instruct the jury that Trump had the right to keep the documents. She might rule that the search was illegal, and dismiss virtually all the evidence as fruit of the poison tree. A witness might lie and get caught lying, and taint the whole case (cough cough Fuhrman cough). The case might be delayed time after time until after the election, when the principle that you can’t prosecute a sitting president comes into play. Or Trump might pardon himself. A hundred things could go wrong.

A plea bargain is always worth considering.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PhillyGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@PhillyGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PhillyGuy)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 1:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7996 "2024-04-07T01:18:49Z")

</div>

I’m against plea bargaining because it penalizes exercising the right to trial.

But everything Peter\_Morris wrote is true, plus there is a substantial chance of GOP justices ruling in favor of Trump on an appeal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7997 "2024-04-07T02:03:19Z")

</div>

> [@Peter\_Morris](#):
>
> A plea bargain is always worth considering.

I’m not opposed to a plea bargain of some sort provided Trump faces real consequences. And since there are so many threads about Trump’s various legal shenanigans, I had to make sure I’m not repeating myself too much in this thread. What I’m opposed to is the idea to any sort of plea bargain where Trump gets off with a slap-on-the-wrist with the idea that it’s preferrable to him getting off scot free. To start with, a slap-on-the-wrist is the same as winning so far as Trump is concerned. More importantly, plea deals in Trump’s favor shouldn’t be made on the grounds that we can’t trust Cannon to do her job properly. If Trump gets away scot free because of a crooked judge then that’s on the judge. But unless Trump capitulates, and shows both remorse and acknowledgement of wrong droing, then no plea bargain should be offered.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PhillyGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@PhillyGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PhillyGuy)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 2:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7998 "2024-04-07T02:51:04Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> But unless Trump capitulates, and shows both remorse and acknowledgement of wrong doing, then no plea bargain should be offered.

That remorse statement would not survive the walk from the courtroom to the first media microphone.

But I guess your real point is that Trump should not be offered a significantly lesser sentence for giving up the right to a trial and the right to appeal. I’d agree, and not just for Trump.

Then, I’m for lower charging and less punishment generally.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stratocaster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stratocaster/32/16393_2.png) [@Stratocaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stratocaster)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/7999 "2024-04-07T03:01:16Z")

</div>

> [@PhillyGuy](#):
>
> But I guess your real point is that Trump should not be offered a significantly lesser sentence for giving up the right to a trial and the right to appeal.

And that’s to the defendant’s benefit, to be denied that choice? If that’s the case, why does any defendant decide not to go to trial, which is perfectly within his power?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PhillyGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@PhillyGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PhillyGuy)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8000 "2024-04-07T03:16:54Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> To start with, a slap-on-the-wrist is the same as winning so far as Trump is concerned.

I don’t like this phrase slap on the wrist.

Suppose an elderly man has to go to a probation office a dozen times to discuss how he’s keeping away from bad companions and so forth. You could say it is a slap on the wrist, but I personally would feel that I was really being punished.

And suppose the punishment is to spend three or four weekends in jail with no internet? The public would say it was a slap on the wrist, but again I question that. It would be worse for Trump than me because I would, with reasonable lighting, read books. He’d hate it.

It’s absurd to wait to punish until years after the offense, and a short sentence may highlight the absurdity. But such slaps seem a real punishment to me. And Trump would agree.

And unless it was shown that Trump actually gave the secrets to an adversary nation, Espionage Act violations should not result in draconian punishment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 3:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8001 "2024-04-07T03:28:25Z")

</div>

> [@PhillyGuy](#):
>
> I don’t like this phrase slap on the wrist.

Between this and your problems with plea bargains, you have what I consider to be very odd ideas when it comes to the American judicial system and how it should work. We are so far apart on this that I don’t feel as though we have any common ground here. For there to be justice the punishment must fit the crime. Trump’s very serious crimes merits serious punishment not a slap on the wrist. It’s probably best to take discussions about plea bargains and judicial punishments in general to another thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8002 "2024-04-07T15:23:39Z")

</div>

> [@PhillyGuy](#):
>
> I don’t like this phrase slap on the wrist.

Waitaminute, are you suggesting that, should Trump be found guilty of everything he’s charged with, his punishment should be a few weeks in jail without internet access because he’d consider that a big deal? That’s fucking absurd.

> [@PhillyGuy](#):
>
> It’s absurd to wait to punish until years after the offense

Do you not understand that driving force behind the absurd length of time is Trump himself? He’s the one creating the delays. He shouldn’t be rewarded for that. In fact, I think one could reasonably argue that he should receive a harsher punishment for wasting government time and what must be in the millions of dollars, on bullshit delays that serve no purpose whatsoever than to delay things.

> [@PhillyGuy](#):
>
> And unless it was shown that Trump actually gave the secrets to an adversary nation, Espionage Act violations should not result in draconian punishment.

So, if I rob a bank, should I just get a weekend in jail if I get caught before I spend the money?

I feel like your hangup is that people are charged with the espionage act without actually doing anything that you consider espionage. If the section of the act that Trump is being charged with was it’s own thing called ‘stealing government documents’ would that change anything for you?

> [@Trump's indictment--does it matter?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trumps-indictment-does-it-matter/985251/459):
>
> As for Trump being so evil that everything he gets charged with will be a big deal, well, thinking like that isn’t me. Espionage Act violations, without real espionage, seem to me more a reason to fire an employee (or not vote for a candidate) than to jail them. If Trump is guilty, of this, the judge should give the minimum amount under the sentencing guidelines, and I’d lower the penalties for everyone if I could.

> [@What happens if Donald Trump actually wins the 2024 Republican nomination under indictment?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-happens-if-donald-trump-actually-wins-the-2024-republican-nomination-under-indictment/985063/67):
>
> I’m not crazy about the fact that the Espionage Act covers, well, non-espionage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EddyTeddyFreddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eddyteddyfreddy/32/18796_2.png) [@EddyTeddyFreddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EddyTeddyFreddy)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 3:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8003 "2024-04-07T15:32:02Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> But unless Trump capitulates, and shows both remorse and acknowledgement of wrong droing, then no plea bargain should be offered.

And that will never happen; he never apologizes for anything. It’s a sign of weakness to him and he cannot abide being seen as weak. As for remorse, he’s never come within a country mile of it in his life.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8004 "2024-04-07T15:44:32Z")

</div>

> [@PhillyGuy](#):
>
> I’m not crazy about the fact that the Espionage Act covers, well, non-espionage.

Yeah, this has ‘tempest in a teapot’ written all over it.

I may not be, _arguendo,_ crazy about _possession of burglary tools_ being a crime, or _possession of bomb-making materials_ potentially being charged as terrorism, but these are ways to categorize relatively lesser offenses that we – as a society – seek to disincentivize as part of an effort to reduce the incidence of much larger, much more serious crimes.

This, to me, is analogous to arguing that the _actual elements of_ the AHCA were desirable, but “Obamacare” wasn’t: a deception by making a label into a snarl word.

[I wasn’t trying to make that a reply to @Joey_P . I bungled it ;-)]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PhillyGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ed655f/32.png) [@PhillyGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PhillyGuy)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2024, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8005 "2024-04-07T16:01:41Z")

</div>

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> > [@PhillyGuy](#):
> >
> > I’m not crazy about the fact that the Espionage Act covers, well, non-espionage.

I wrote that ten months ago and no longer think it.

Liberals often (at least before Trump was an issue) criticize the Espionage Act, but the criticism I threw out there is a bad one.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329.md?page=398)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329.md?page=400)
