# FBI Search and Seizure at Trump's Mar-A-Lago Residence, August 8, 2022, Case Dismissed July 15, 2024

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Tags:** trump\
**Created:** [August 8, 2022, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329 "2022-08-08T23:18:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 419

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aspenglow](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aspenglow/32/76_2.png) [@Aspenglow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aspenglow)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2024, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8386 "2024-06-27T23:16:12Z")

</div>

Because of course she is.

(Gift link.)

> **[Judge to Revisit Key Legal Finding in Trump Classified Documents Case](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/us/politics/trump-lawyer-documents-case.html?unlocked_article_code=1.200.TUBV.hJQX_fLtMw7r&smid=url-share)**
>
> Even though another federal court has ruled on the matter, Judge Aileen Cannon said she would hold a hearing to determine whether prosecutors can use information from one of the former president’s lawyers.

Cannon is intimating that she knows better than Judge Beryl Howell. That should go well. /s

But hey, it eats up lots of time!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 1:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8387 "2024-07-15T13:59:55Z")

</div>

Dismissed!

> <https://x.com/kaitlancollins/status/1812848886643294606?t=PGsI09yyS3nJqsaNOCoQ-Q&s=19>

> <https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1812848096914690190?t=1fj6jMGOVS25YgCEUOJZsA&s=19>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8388 "2024-07-15T14:01:54Z")

</div>

The view from (going) over her head will be lovely.

She needs _spanked_ – judicially and with extreme prejudice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8389 "2024-07-15T14:02:01Z")

</div>

Isn’t this actually good news? No jury empaneled, so no double jeopardy, and now Smith can bring the case before a different judge?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8390 "2024-07-15T14:07:08Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> No jury empaneled, so no double jeopardy, and now Smith can bring the case before a different judge?

You’re probably right on double jeopardy, but Smith will have to appeal, get this reversed, and then it would be remanded back to Judge Cannon. The government can ask that it be reassigned to a different judge, but that would be an unusual ruling by the Court of Appeals (justified, in my opinion, but unlikely).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8391 "2024-07-15T14:07:29Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Isn’t this actually good news? No jury empaneled, so no double jeopardy, and now Smith can bring the case before a different judge?

Appears that way.

Is that pic of Page 1 enough to determine that she dismissed the case (dismissed the charges?) **WITHOUT prejudice**? Quoting Cannon: “_The effect of this Order is confined to this proceeding._”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8392 "2024-07-15T14:07:49Z")

</div>

No jeopardy, which is nice, but it’s been delayed enough such that nothing will happen before November. He will likely wriggle away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8393 "2024-07-15T14:14:53Z")

</div>

Wow, two bullets dodged in one week.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MulderMuffin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/muldermuffin/32/2862_2.png) [@MulderMuffin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MulderMuffin)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8394 "2024-07-15T14:15:37Z")

</div>

This case should have been the slam dunk, open and shut, easy peasy case that was heard and adjudicated last year. The facts were easy to understand and pretty hard to argue against. I am infuriated. Seriously shaking furious. Damn corrupt judge.

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> She needs _spanked_ – judicially and with extreme prejudice.

Amen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dinsdale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/97f17d/32.png) [@Dinsdale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dinsdale)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8395 "2024-07-15T14:16:22Z")

</div>

What a piece of work!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8396 "2024-07-15T14:17:38Z")

</div>

I haven’t attempted to understand the arguments about the appointment issue, but I will say it seems ironic that a special counsel is appointed for Trump’s protection, to remove “Biden’s Justice Department” from the prosecution, and it bites them in the ass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8397 "2024-07-15T14:18:08Z")

</div>

We may now be looking at our next Supreme Court Justice

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dinsdale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/97f17d/32.png) [@Dinsdale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dinsdale)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8398 "2024-07-15T14:22:34Z")

</div>

My position was recently the subject of a SCt decision (Lucia 138 SCt 2044) holding us to be “inferior officers.”

Struck me to be a bullshit argument/decision then, as it does now. Don’t be so certain that the Supremes will overturn Loose Cannon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8399 "2024-07-15T14:23:25Z")

</div>

The SCOTUS may not, but will it even get to them? It goes to the 11th first, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MulderMuffin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/muldermuffin/32/2862_2.png) [@MulderMuffin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MulderMuffin)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8400 "2024-07-15T14:26:36Z")

</div>

> [@Dinsdale](#):
>
> Don’t be so certain that the Supremes will overturn Loose Cannon.

Won’t it go to the 11th Circuit first? I know Alito recently mentioned that he thought the appointment of Special Councils was unconstitutional, but it seemed like that was an unpopular opinion. Will the Supremes really want every single case brought by every special council overturned in one fell swoop? I know they don’t honor precedent, but damn, this has a LOT of precedent.

\*\*correcting myself, it was Thomas, not Alito who held that the special councils were unconstitutional unless appointed by Congress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8401 "2024-07-15T14:27:29Z")

</div>

I’m guessing Cannon wanted to dismiss this case while the news was still mainly covering the shooting in Pennsylvania, so as to get minimal attention.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8402 "2024-07-15T14:28:53Z")

</div>

> [@MulderMuffin](#):
>
> I know Alito recently mentioned that he thought the appointment of Special Councils was unconstitutional, but it seemed like that was an unpopular opinion

Hunter BIden will be happy to hear this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dinsdale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/97f17d/32.png) [@Dinsdale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dinsdale)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8403 "2024-07-15T14:32:31Z")

</div>

Sure, to the 11th first. Then may request en banc. But, if the 11th overturns Loose Cnnon, who would Trump’s team appeal to?

I’m just looking towards the final authority.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rocking\_chair](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rocking_chair/32/2918_2.png) [@rocking\_chair](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rocking_chair)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8404 "2024-07-15T14:39:44Z")

</div>

thomas did tip his hand regarding special councels. cannon is saying jack smith is not authorized to conduct the prosecution.

as i understand it there are 2 ways to go.

1. appeal to 11th circuit.
2. refile with a different prosecutor.  
of course
3. just give up is not an option.

what a few days it has been in the usa.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2024, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329/8405 "2024-07-15T14:47:51Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Isn’t this actually good news? No jury empaneled, so no double jeopardy, and now Smith can bring the case before a different judge?

Is this how it works or will he have to appeal this to the 11th circuit? (This has been talked about as what Cannon was trying to avoid by not quite stepping over the line into blatantly doing Trump’s doing, which is a line that was just leaped over with aplomb ☹ )

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329.md?page=418)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-search-and-seizure-at-trumps-mar-a-lago-residence-august-8-2022-case-dismissed-july-15-2024/969329.md?page=420)
