# FBI Teaches Agents: 'Mainstream' Muslims Are 'Violent, Radical'

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 15, 2011, 3:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367 "2011-09-15T03:55:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/91b2a8/32.png) [@Uzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uzi)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2011, 3:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/61 "2011-09-17T03:24:00Z")

</div>

> [@brocks](#):
>
> “The FBI is teaching its counterterrorism agents that ‘main stream’ [sic] American Muslims are likely to be terrorist sympathizers; that the Prophet Mohammed was a ‘cult leader’; and that the Islamic practice of giving charity is no more than a ‘funding mechanism for combat.’”

1. American Muslims as terrorist sympathizers: Given the support of Muslims in predominantly Muslim countries for terrorists, it is likely that the support is higher within the group of Americans who comprise Muslims. Now what the ratio is, 1-2, 1-5, or 1-1000000, who knows?
2. Prophet Mohammed as a cult leader: Duh! Of course he was. What else could you call him? And a pedophile to boot.
3. Islamic charities: I’d have to disagree with this in principle. In practice [maybe](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_charities_accused_of_ties_to_terrorism). Inadvertently, many people may give to a specific charity not realizing that is is a front. I remember seeing many collection boxes while in Dubai and a few requests for money while in Yemen to help out the Palestinians. To build houses, or to buy weapons? I don’t know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2011, 1:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/62 "2011-09-17T13:31:44Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> 1. American Muslims as terrorist sympathizers: Given the support of Muslims in predominantly Muslim countries for terrorists, it is likely that the support is higher within the group of Americans who comprise Muslims. Now what the ratio is, 1-2, 1-5, or 1-1000000, who knows?

Reading fail. “Likely to be terrorist sympathizers” =/= “more likely than the general public to be terrorist sympathizers”.

> [@](#):
>
> 1. Islamic charities: I’d have to disagree with this in principle. In practice maybe. Inadvertently, many people may give to a specific charity not realizing that is is a front. I remember seeing many collection boxes while in Dubai and a few requests for money while in Yemen to help out the Palestinians. To build houses, or to buy weapons? I don’t know.

You may find this shocking, but Dubai and Yemen are not in America.

Anyway, hundreds of Irish-American charities were funding the IRA and its splinter groups, “in practice”. Was the FBI teaching agents that Catholic charity was solely a terror-funding mechanism?

[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]  
Can somebody libel me? I need a new car.  
[/QUOTE]

**Bryan Ekers** wears velcro shoes because he can’t tie shoelaces.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uber\_the\_Goober](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/58956e/32.png) [@Uber\_the\_Goober](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uber_the_Goober)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2011, 3:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/63 "2011-09-17T15:01:57Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Can somebody libel me? I need a new car.
> 
> Thanks.

Bryan Ekers enjoys bestiality, drives a Ford Pinto over grandmothers on the sidewalk, AND!!! he enjoys bagels \*without \*cream cheese.

\*Without \*I tell you!  
eta: see, he really does need a new car. That Pinto has too many dents in the bumper. What with the grandmothers fighting back with their canes and walkers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2011, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/64 "2011-09-17T16:55:17Z")

</div>

Thanks, I’ll sue you in England.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeriel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/58956e/32.png) [@Zeriel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeriel)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 1:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/65 "2011-09-18T01:11:31Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Can somebody libel me? I need a new car.
> 
> Thanks.

Yer ugly and yer momma dresses you funny!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/91b2a8/32.png) [@Uzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uzi)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/66 "2011-09-18T01:22:06Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Reading fail. “Likely to be terrorist sympathizers” =/= “more likely than the general public to be terrorist sympathizers”.

Actually, Muslims around the world tend to support terrorist activities more than the ‘general public’. Because you want to tack ‘American’ in front of Muslim, doesn’t mean that on average they would most likely follow the trend for ‘Muslim’.

> [@](#):
>
> You may find this shocking, but Dubai and Yemen are not in America.

And then you go on to write your next paragraph. Speaking of fail.

> [@](#):
>
> Anyway, hundreds of Irish-American charities were funding the IRA and its splinter groups, “in practice”. Was the FBI teaching agents that Catholic charity was solely a terror-funding mechanism?

I don’t know, should they have been teaching that Irish Catholics were more likely to give money to the IRA through charities.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Farmer\_Jane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Farmer\_Jane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farmer_Jane)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/67 "2011-09-18T01:22:45Z")

</div>

Right before the 9/11 anniversary, there was a series of articles in the Denver Post about Colorado Muslims.

[This was one of them](http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_18865341). It it really so that the local and state law enforcement agencies are better at their jobs than the FBI? 😕

The last I heard about the FBI and Muslims here in my area was when someone was planning a terrorist attack.

> [@](#):
>
> Ziyad Alsoor, president of the Colorado Muslim Society in Denver, said he does not know Zazi but was shocked by the news. Alsoor said 30,000 Muslims call Colorado home.
> 
> “It seems like any time anyone of Muslim descent is investigated, all the news media goes crazy,” he said. “This doesn’t happen to Christians.”
> 
> Authorities haven’t found anything during their investigation of Zazi, he said.
> 
> “But he’s a marked man,” Alssor said. “It’s just crazy to me. Every time we think things are back to normal, something like this pops up. It’s not right.”
> 
> Hafadh Ferjani, president of the Denver Islamic Society, said he was surprised by the allegations because his group has been meeting regularly with the FBI and other federal agencies to go over immigration and other issues. There had been no mention of an investigation, he said.

[The FBI wasn’t kidding](http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2009/september/zazi_092409).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 1:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/68 "2011-09-18T01:31:48Z")

</div>

Trouble is, they are so _stealthy_. My own Congressman, Kieth Ellison, is so \*normal \*looking, it’s hard to detect the Islamic rays. Perhaps some identifier, so we could more readily see who is who? A marker, a patch, badge. Maybe a crescent? Or a star, perhaps? Yellow is nice. Traditional.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/91b2a8/32.png) [@Uzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uzi)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 2:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/69 "2011-09-18T02:24:19Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> A marker, a patch, badge.

Probably the ones who require their wives and daughters to dress in ninja outfits would be a good identifier? Emphasis on ‘require’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 3:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/70 "2011-09-18T03:31:49Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> 1. Prophet Mohammed as a cult leader: Duh! Of course he was. What else could you call him? And a pedophile to boot.

I didn’t realize you were upset at Shakespeare for promoting child molesting and pedophilia.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maryhartslegs](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a4c791/32.png) [@Maryhartslegs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maryhartslegs)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 4:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/71 "2011-09-18T04:37:52Z")

</div>

I heard Christ was a real barnburner , when it comes to lighting a fire to the “non Halal crowd”. Wonder what he assumes of Rick Perry supporters?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/91b2a8/32.png) [@Uzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uzi)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 4:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/72 "2011-09-18T04:53:08Z")

</div>

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> I didn’t realize you were upset at Shakespeare for promoting child molesting and pedophilia.

Hahaha, you got me. I guess I’ll have to approve of Muhammed being a pedophile to avoid grouping Shakespeare (assuming he was promoting pedophilia rather than just telling a story) with him.:rolleyes:  
But, I guess I didn’t realize Shakespeare was a religious leader that a billion people attempt to emulate such that I should be concerned about what he said or did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Farmer\_Jane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Farmer\_Jane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Farmer_Jane)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 6:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/73 "2011-09-18T06:14:43Z")

</div>

…because there’s nothing strange about Sarai marrying her uncle Abram…or any other stories in religions that are centuries old.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 6:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/74 "2011-09-18T06:43:08Z")

</div>

> [@Zeriel](#):
>
> Can we cease with all the ITR vs. brocks bullshit and get back to the damn point of the thread?

Normally I’d agree with your sentiment but \*\*brock \*\*delivered a savage fact beating which is a picture perfect example of why I continue to show up here.

There aren’t enough of those on this planet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SciFiSam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/47e85d/32.png) [@SciFiSam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SciFiSam)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 11:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/75 "2011-09-18T11:24:04Z")

</div>

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> I didn’t realize you were upset at Shakespeare for promoting child molesting and pedophilia.

Are you referring to Romeo and Juliet? They were both teenagers, which is only paedophilia in the most fucked-up of definitions. The other children that got killed or molested in Shakespeare’s plays were in Titus Andronicus, where it was very bad guys doing it, with no advocacy of their actions.

Surely you can come up with a better defence of Mohammed than that? The one I’ve heard is that he didn’t consummate the marriage until she was a lot older.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/91b2a8/32.png) [@Uzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uzi)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 12:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/76 "2011-09-18T12:46:50Z")

</div>

> [@SciFiSam](#):
>
> Surely you can come up with a better defence of Mohammed than that?

What others did, and may have gotten away with, is no defense at all. I always wonder why people keep bringing it up. That being said, I’ve probably resorted to that argument myself a time or two in the past before I realized that evil is evil no matter who does it.

> [@](#):
>
> The one I’ve heard is that he didn’t consummate the marriage until she was a lot older.

Heh. Riiiiggght. He was married to a 9 year old. He’s a pedophile. Sucks to be a Muslim and have to defend it, but they’re stuck with the cards they’re dealt. No wonder they have no sense of humor when it comes to their religion.  
But then Christians have to sidestep the homosexuality of Jesus. A thirty year old Jew not married in biblical times and travelling around with a bunch of men? Not that there is anything wrong with that (other than for Christians), but it’s pretty damn suspicious. So, everyone has their cross to bear. Ha.

Edit: Eh, sorry for being particularly argumentative, but I’ve a cold and hopped up on Panadol.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SciFiSam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/47e85d/32.png) [@SciFiSam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SciFiSam)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 1:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/77 "2011-09-18T13:32:34Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> What others did, and may have gotten away with, is no defense at all. I always wonder why people keep bringing it up. That being said, I’ve probably resorted to that argument myself a time or two in the past before I realized that evil is evil no matter who does it.

Which argument? Who’s got away with what? 😕 (I also have a cold and a stuffed-up head, so might be missing something).

> [@](#):
>
> Heh. Riiiiggght. He was married to a 9 year old. He’s a pedophile. Sucks to be a Muslim and have to defend it, but they’re stuck with the cards they’re dealt. No wonder they have no sense of humor when it comes to their religion.  
> But then Christians have to sidestep the homosexuality of Jesus. A thirty year old Jew not married in biblical times and travelling around with a bunch of men? Not that there is anything wrong with that (other than for Christians), but it’s pretty damn suspicious. So, everyone has their cross to bear. Ha.
> 
> Edit: Eh, sorry for being particularly argumentative, but I’ve a cold and hopped up on Panadol.

Well, it wouldn’t be that unusual in ye olde days for a child to be ‘married’ but for that to actually be about land and money, not sex for several years. But yeah, it is a very difficult one - but there HAVE to be better arguments than ‘a British playwright once wrote about teenagers having sex with each other.’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brocks](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7feea3/32.png) [@brocks](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brocks)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/78 "2011-09-18T16:26:04Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> Heh. Riiiiggght. He was married to a 9 year old. He’s a pedophile. Sucks to be a Muslim and have to defend it, but they’re stuck with the cards they’re dealt.

Yes, it’s much nicer to be a Christian who knows how holy and precious marriage should be, and can point to the wisest man in the Bible, King Solomon, who demonstrated the sanctity of marriage by having 700 wives and 300 concubines.

It’s so nice to meet a real Quranic scholar, who can educate me on Islam, because I was raised a Christian, and most of what I know about religion is from that perspective.

So please tell me, do Muslims really have as much to be embarrassed about with respect to women and marriage as Christians and Jews do? Just off the top of my head, the heroes of the Bible commit incest (Lot with his daughters, shortly after he offered their maidenheads to the town bullies so they would leave him and his guests alone); aggravated adultery (Abraham whoring out his wife to various foreign leaders, again in order to obtain good treatment for himself — I guess sacrificing women for your own comfort ran in that family); David murdering the loyal husband of the woman he was fucking; and all the various laws regarding women and sex that most Christians think of as Islamic, but are actually from the Bible — stoning a woman for not being a virgin on her wedding night, or even for being raped (if it occurred in a city, rather than a field).

Is Muhammad’s marriage all you have to stack up against stuff like that?

Oh wait, the Quran allegedly says to kill infidels. But does it say it as forcefully and as often as the Bible, which contains divine orders to mercilessly slaughter every man, woman, child, and baby who has the temerity to be living in the cities the Israelites want, and to enslave the occupants of the surrounding regions?

> [@](#):
>
> No wonder they have no sense of humor when it comes to their religion.

Right, like Christians have been a load of laughs for anybody who didn’t toe the orthodox line, for most of history.

The important difference between Christianity and Islam is not intolerance, it is the separation of Church and State. For a thousand years or so, when the Catholic Church had secular power, any heresy was liable to get you tortured and/or killed, and this became a science with the establishment of the various Inquisitions in the high Middle Ages. Even well after the Reformation, in Europe and even in colonial America, some of the Protestant governments were almost as bad. The Bible has not changed since then, nor have the desires of religious fanatics; it is only the lack of political power that keeps them from being as bad or worse than any Ayatollah when it comes to punishing people for what they think or say.

And god help us, the US seems determined to elect leaders whose religious fanaticism is much more evident than their wisdom or intelligence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 4:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/79 "2011-09-18T16:41:15Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> Actually, Muslims around the world tend to support terrorist activities more than the ‘general public’. Because you want to tack ‘American’ in front of Muslim, doesn’t mean that on average they would most likely follow the trend for ‘Muslim’.

The point is that even if Muslims are _more_ likely to support terrorist activities, it doesn’t mean they are simply likely (no qualifier) to do so.

Put another way, priests are more likely than the general public to be paedophiles. That doesn’t mean priests are likely to be paedophiles. Get it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2011, 6:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367/80 "2011-09-18T18:10:54Z")

</div>

We’ve been through this once before, pressed **Uzi** on the sources of his certainty. “Weak” is probably the most generous description. The open minded amongst you can google this question pretty easily. As you might well expect, there is considerable ambiguity, mostly because the textual basis is thin. Reminds me of Mark Twain’s comment about nineteenth century paleontology: a wholesale return in conjecture from a tiny investment of fact.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fbi-teaches-agents-mainstream-muslims-are-violent-radical/596367.md?page=5)
