# Fear the Walking Dead: 2.11 "Pablo & Jessica" (open spoilers)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fear-the-walking-dead-2-11-pablo-jessica-open-spoilers/765721>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [September 12, 2016, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fear-the-walking-dead-2-11-pablo-jessica-open-spoilers/765721 "2016-09-12T00:07:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2016, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fear-the-walking-dead-2-11-pablo-jessica-open-spoilers/765721/21 "2016-09-16T00:41:57Z")

</div>

> [@CannyDan](#):
>
> way back in the dawn of time when John Campbell was an editorial force, there was a clear difference between _science fiction_ and _fantasy_. In the former, wild, even outrageous circumstances were allowable. But given the basic premise (faster than light travel, or zombies exist) all other normal conditions apply and things must follow logically and consistently from their antecedents.

I’ve always had a problem with that, for example, the Battlestar Galactica reboot literally calling on deux ex machina to end the series.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fear-the-walking-dead-2-11-pablo-jessica-open-spoilers/765721.md?page=1)