# Feel the #extortion Bernie has planned

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [March 28, 2016, 7:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443 "2016-03-28T07:09:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/21 "2016-03-28T13:19:04Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> “Encourage” would be a better word.

Tom has enough command of the language to know the difference. He can speak for himself.

> [@](#):
>
> With that word, Tom’s point is self-evidently correct

Got a comparative example from recent history to show us, by way of illustration? :dubious:

> [@](#):
>
> and your nonsense about honor and pettiness barely rises to the level of ironic.

No response possible there but a pat on the head.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/22 "2016-03-28T13:28:29Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> Got a comparative example from recent history to show us, by way of illustration? :dubious:

Sure. Every single time in American history that a democratic socialist has campaigned for president under the Democratic label, things have played out exactly this way.

This campaign is a bit different from historical comparisons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 1:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/23 "2016-03-28T13:36:11Z")

</div>

Give us the name of a loser from recent history who has successfully extorted the winner. And no more of this “this time is different” nonsense. C’mon now.

Examples of losers who chose the petty and destructive way to exit include Reagan in 1976 and Kennedy in 1980, and both came very much closer to winning their nominations than Sanders will. But all they succeeded in doing was damaging their party’s nominees to the point where they lost.

The choice of method of exit applies to a candidate’s \*supporters \*too, btw, not just the candidate. Something to think about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 1:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/24 "2016-03-28T13:43:46Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> The choice of method of exit applies to a candidate’s \*supporters \*too, btw, not just the candidate. Something to think about.

Treating politics like a game leads to terrible decisions.

Look, I’ve been around the block a few times. I know I’ll be putting that clothespin on my nose and voting for Clinton come November, I’ve got the clothespin ready. But if you actually want most of Sanders’s supporters to vote for Clinton in November, what you’re doing–sneering at them and calling them names–is mightily counterproductive. Your strategy here and elsewhere on the SDMB could not possibly give greater comfort to Trump.

I encourage Sanders to exit gracefully come June and throw his support behind Clinton. At the same time, his supporters’ support must be gained strategically and intelligently. The DNC has as one of its great weaknesses a sense of entitlement to everyone’s votes and a furious contempt for anyone who won’t vote for them; I hope they don’t fall into the same error you and Slacker fall into on these boards, of thinking that insulting and alienating people is the best way to win them over to your cause.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inbred\_Mm\_domesticus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/aca169/32.png) [@Inbred\_Mm\_domesticus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inbred_Mm_domesticus)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/25 "2016-03-28T14:08:38Z")

</div>

Why would a candidate indicate support for their opponent in the middle of the campaign? I was annoyed when I heard what Bernie said, but I will save judgement for what he actually does after July. It would be stupid of him to criticize Clinton’s platform and then say he would give unconditional support to her if she were to win the nomination.

The Republicans had a very hard time saying they would support the Republican nominee even though they signed an agreement to do so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 2:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/26 "2016-03-28T14:19:04Z")

</div>

> [@steronz](#):
>
> And then it’s the winner’s job to actually go win the general election, right? It’s absurd to think that if Hillary loses, it’s somehow Sanders’ fault.
> 
> Your complete disrespect for Sanders’ supporters is clouding your judgment here, and your characterization of them as blinking automatons who will do anything that Sanders instructs them to do is laughable. Know what will happen if Sanders tells his supporters to vote for Clinton? They’ll label him a sellout and stay home. She doesn’t have those votes regardless of what Sanders says.

Not true. Every Bernhead I know personally (and I know a great many, including my mother) has said they will vote for Hillary in the fall if she wins the nomination. Some of them throw in the requisite verbiage about “nose holding”, while others say they will be perfectly happy to support her against any Republican–they just like Bernie better.

I see some “friends of friends” on Facebook talking about sitting it out or voting Jill Stein, and I’m sure there are some like that here. But I’d also be willing to bet that most of the Bernie supporters here plan to vote for the Democratic nominee in the fall. So your “She doesn’t have those votes regardless of what Sanders says” line is a ludicrous overstatement.

Furthermore, I do believe that, especially because Sanders’s following is so young and passionate, there are more than a few whom he could persuade to vote or not vote for Hillary by either vigorously endorsing her or refusing to do so.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Sure. Every single time in American history that a democratic socialist has campaigned for president under the Democratic label, things have played out exactly this way.
> 
> This campaign is a bit different from historical comparisons.

So you’re basically admitting that the folks running the DNC were naive, suckers really, to open up their database for him to pillage while he vampirically built up his brand without giving anything back to the party. Got it.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> I encourage Sanders to exit gracefully come June and throw his support behind Clinton. At the same time, his supporters’ support must be gained strategically and intelligently. The DNC has as one of its great weaknesses a sense of entitlement to everyone’s votes and a furious contempt for anyone who won’t vote for them; I hope they don’t fall into the same error you and Slacker fall into on these boards, of thinking that insulting and alienating people is the best way to win them over to your cause.

This is so fascinating to kind of slow down and unpack. If Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters were seen as being on equal footing, there might be an expectation of more concern that Bernheads are \*terrible \*by this measure. There is \*far \*more excoriation of Hillary on social media than vice versa.

But you know what I read between these lines? (You are welcome to dispute my reading, and I’m 89% sure you will.) That it’s not just in calendar year terms that Hillary backers are the wise adults in the room, while the Bernheads are impetuous, hotheaded youngsters who need to be carefully managed. We mature Clintonistas should be able to “rise above” and not let all the hot anti-Hillary rhetoric bother us. Like special education teachers, we have to shake off the insults and respond with patience and compassion.

And I can actually see the wisdom of this counsel! But I can’t resist pointing out its interesting (and perhaps unintended, at least consciously) implications. :dubious:

ETA:

> [@Inbred\_Mm\_domesticus](#):
>
> Why would a candidate indicate support for their opponent in the middle of the campaign? I was annoyed when I heard what Bernie said, but I will save judgement for what he actually does after July. It would be stupid of him to criticize Clinton’s platform and then say he would give unconditional support to her if she were to win the nomination.
> 
> The Republicans had a very hard time saying they would support the Republican nominee even though they signed an agreement to do so.

But that’s because they have such an extreme insurgent as frontrunner. Hillary is not that by any stretch of the imagination. And they still did say they would support the nominee. In past elections, they (and the same on the Democratic side) simply said “yes, I intend to win the nomination but I will support the nominee regardless”. That’s what being in a party is about. Bernie is just using, rather than joining, the Democratic Party, is the problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/27 "2016-03-28T14:23:01Z")

</div>

> [@SlackerInc](#):
>
> So you’re basically admitting that the folks running the DNC were naive, suckers really, to open up their database for him to pillage while he vampirically built up his brand without giving anything back to the party. Got it.

That has so little to do with what I wrote that I wonder if you accidentally ran it back and forth through a translator program a few dozen times.

> [@](#):
>
> This is so fascinating to kind of slow down and unpack. If Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters were seen as being on equal footing, there might be an expectation of more concern that Bernheads are terrible by this measure. There is far more excoriation of Hillary on social media than vice versa.

Yeah. And if you were on my Facebook feed, you’d see me repeatedly telling Sanders supporters to knock it the hell off as well. But you’re here, and this time you’re the culprit, so you hear me telling you to knock it off.

As for your silly little whines about how Poopypants Boogereater Bernheads are the real immature ones, I’ll let the irony of that stand on its own :).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/28 "2016-03-28T14:28:47Z")

</div>

> [@SlackerInc](#):
>
> Wow, you guys think you can lecture me about politics–but you don’t seem to understand it at all. The loser in a primary does not get to dictate what the winner’s platform will be. The voters chose the winner, meaning they chose the _winner’s_ platform, not the loser’s.

That’s the funniest thing I’ve read all month.

The “loser” gets to negotiate whatever he is able to and the “winner” gets to accept as much or as little as he thinks is prudent to get keep the “loser’s” supporters on board.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheSeaOtter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ed655f/32.png) [@TheSeaOtter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TheSeaOtter)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/29 "2016-03-28T14:47:43Z")

</div>

> [@DSeid](#):
>
> Bwahahaha?
> 
> Boy, Tom the level of your discourse has dropped embarrassingly.

It’s not Tom’s fault if sometimes someone says something so utterly absurd that the only appropriate response is laughter.  
This whole idea is the most amazingly silly thing I’ve seen recently. Sanders represents a massive section of the Democratic electorate. Not a majority, true, but a _lot_ of people. There’s nothing unreasonable about expecting the eventual nominee to actually earn the support of those people. And there’s nothing noteworthy about Sanders saying so. This is completely ordinary political maneuvering. Nothing to see here. Move along. Seriously, take that ‘Mt. Catastrophe!’ sign out of that molehill - it’s blocking traffic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrCube](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a3d4f5/32.png) [@DrCube](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrCube)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 3:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/30 "2016-03-28T15:01:08Z")

</div>

I won’t support or vote for Clinton unless she changes her policies, too. Does that make me guilty of extortion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 3:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/31 "2016-03-28T15:03:12Z")

</div>

No. just pettiness. It makes you “guilty” of preferring Trump to Clinton as President.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrCube](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a3d4f5/32.png) [@DrCube](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrCube)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/32 "2016-03-28T15:22:03Z")

</div>

Well, the OP specifically said “extortion”. Did he mean to just accuse Sanders of pettiness?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 3:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/33 "2016-03-28T15:24:29Z")

</div>

> [@Inbred\_Mm\_domesticus](#):
>
> Why would a candidate indicate support for their opponent in the middle of the campaign?

It’s only that if the issue is still undecided. Is it really? And, if it isn’t, what will change in Sanders’ stance when it does get to that point?

> [@](#):
>
> It would be stupid of him to criticize Clinton’s platform and then say he would give unconditional support to her if she were to win the nomination.

Not stupid, just realistic, although that cannot be a given in his case. Look at the alternative.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/34 "2016-03-28T15:27:07Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> what you’re doing–sneering at them and calling them names

Example? :dubious:

> [@](#):
>
> Your strategy here and elsewhere on the SDMB could not possibly give greater comfort to Trump.

Projection.

> [@](#):
>
> At the same time, his supporters’ support must be gained strategically and intelligently.

Just say “President Clinton or President Trump?” It isn’t hard.

> [@](#):
>
> The DNC has as one of its great weaknesses a sense of entitlement to everyone’s votes and a furious contempt for anyone who won’t vote for them

More projection.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CaptMurdock](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/captmurdock/32/11736_2.png) [@CaptMurdock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CaptMurdock)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/35 "2016-03-28T15:37:34Z")

</div>

> [@SlackerInc](#):
>
> P.S. Carpenter is not just a random nobody blogger. The guy has a PhD and has written for CNN: [Why right and left won't cheer Obama - CNN.com](http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/12/20/carpenter.obama.political.credit/)

Ben Carson has an MD, and he thinks the pyramids were grain warehouses. Nuff Said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/36 "2016-03-28T16:01:34Z")

</div>

So I just watched the Young Turks excerpt, and I think the OP is pretty dramatically far afield from what Sanders was asked and what he answered.

The question wasn’t, what will it take to earn an endorsement? The question was, “If you were to lose, and the Democratic establishment comes to you and says, take this movement that is full of energy and is against the establishment, and make sure they vote for the establishment candidate, what do you say?”

**Elvis’s** objection earlier to “directing” Sanders supporters is echoed in what Sanders says: “Number one, I’m not big into being a leader, I much prefer to see a lot of leaders and a lot of grassroots activism.” In other words, he’s not **able** to make sure they vote for the establishment candidate. He can’t flip that switch.

The rest of his answer is a bit rambling, but its message seems to be, if you want the votes of all these progressive activists, you should show that you’re progressive, you should stand up for progressive causes.

Now, sure, he could have said, “I’ll go the fear route. I’ll tell the DNC that they should not worry about progressive issues, they should do nothing to make themselves more appealing to progressives, they should put all their energy into threatening progressives with visions of a Trump presidency.” Slacker, is that what you think he should have said? Is that what you want progressives to say to the DNC?

If so, I’m afraid we’re gonna disagree. Me, I want progressives to push the DNC **hard** to take more progressive stands on issues. I want progressives to push the DNC **hard** to stop abandoning the South, and instead to work in all 50 states to take back state legislatures and governorships. I want progressives to stand up for progressive values.

And that’s exactly what Sanders’s rambling answer said, and that’s what you characterize as “extortion.” Anything short of saying, “I’ll tell progressives who voted for me to shut up and vote for Clinton” appears to be some sort of backhanded support for Trump, to you.

And that’s baloney.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 4:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/37 "2016-03-28T16:02:57Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> Example? :dubious:
> 
> Projection.
> 
> Just say “President Clinton or President Trump?” It isn’t hard.
> 
> More projection.

I am reminded of how political conversations with you inevitably go, and will bow out of that particular one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 4:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/38 "2016-03-28T16:06:00Z")

</div>

“Directing” is **Tom** ’s word choice, not the OP’s or mine or anyone else’s AFAICT.

“Supporting Trump” is \*your \*accusation about _me_. :rolleyes:

And no examples at all of me saying what you claimed I said, in your previous post.

Gotta do better than that here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/39 "2016-03-28T16:50:40Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Now, sure, he could have said, “I’ll go the fear route. I’ll tell the DNC that they should not worry about progressive issues, they should do nothing to make themselves more appealing to progressives, they should put all their energy into threatening progressives with visions of a Trump presidency.” Slacker, is that what you think he should have said? Is that what you want progressives to say to the DNC?

We’re not talking about “them”. I have no more hope of corralling progressives writ large than of becoming a professional cat herder. We are talking about Bernie Sanders here. And what I want \*him \*to say is something like:

> [@](#):
>
> It is vitally important that we elect Hillary Clinton president, which is why I am giving her my endorsement today. This does not mean I now magically agree with the Secretary on every issue. Nor does it mean I won’t stand up in the Senate and lead the charge against a bill I consider wrongheaded, even if she and most of the Democratic establishment are for it.
> 
> But just as I worked with President Obama, helping craft the ACA even though it was not the single payer program I would have preferred, I would look forward to working with a “Madam President” Clinton, to lobbying her to come closer to my position, to the position of all of you, my wonderful grassroots supporters. She has already done such great work on [yadda yadda, insert laundry list here], and with the continued active participation of all of you, I think we can push her to maybe even go a little further, like maybe we’ll find some compromise between her $12/hr. minimum wage and my $15 [insert twinkle in eye].
> 
> But I know this: there would be no lobbying a President Trump or Cruz, no working with them to make America better. The best we could do is to try to oppose their dark agenda as best as we can. But no matter how hard we try to stop them, I’m afraid that a Trump or Cruz presidency would mean the end of Obamacare, would mean the recapturing of the Supreme Court by the right for generations to come, ending any hope of overturning Citizens United.\* [Maybe list other SCOTUS impacts.]
> 
> If Trump or Cruz win, we are likely to get mired in more costly and counterproductive wars around the world that just make us less safe. We’ll go back to practicing torture, and regulatory agencies will once again become run by the industries they regulate as they were under George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. Progress toward climate change will become stymied…[etc.]

Add the standard finishing flourishes and that works for me.

\*I, **SlackerInc** , \*support \*the Citizens United decision; but I’m talking about the proper political appeal here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MaxTheVool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MaxTheVool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MaxTheVool)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2016, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443/40 "2016-03-28T17:18:41Z")

</div>

> [@SlackerInc](#):
>
> [Hillary Clinton from Barack Obama in 2008.](http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/07/us/politics/07text-clinton.html?_r=0) I’ll wait.

Well, he did make her secretary of state. So there’s that.  
As for your general position in this thread, I think the real question is not what Bernie says he will do in a hypothetical future while he’s still trying to win the nomination. If Clinton does eventually win the nomination (as seems likely but not certain), it’s reasonable to judge how he acts then. But it would be ridiculous for him to effectively concede defeat at this point by starting to treat Hillary as the presumptive nominee.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/feel-the-extortion-bernie-has-planned/750443.md?page=3)
