# Female astronauts and bras

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 2, 2001, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138 "2001-01-02T20:59:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 19\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![howardsims](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e8c25b/32.png) [@howardsims](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/howardsims)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2001, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/1 "2001-01-02T20:59:39Z")

</div>

Since there is no gravity in space; do female astronauts wear bras?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stupendous\_man](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a8b319/32.png) [@Stupendous\_man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stupendous_man)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2001, 9:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/2 "2001-01-02T21:07:03Z")

</div>

There is still gravity, just not enough for you to be terribly affected by it.  
Despite the distance from a gravitational source, objects still have a mass and momentum while in motion. A female astronaut would still benefit from having a bra on, if for no other reason that to keep things under control while she is moving around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stupendous\_man](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a8b319/32.png) [@Stupendous\_man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stupendous_man)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2001, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/3 "2001-01-02T21:10:50Z")

</div>

There is still gravity. You’re just too far away from the mass to be terribly affected by it.  
Despite the distance from a gravitational source, objects still have a mass, and have momentum while in motion. A female astronaut would still benefit from having a bra on, if for no other reason that to keep things under control while she is moving around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSgtBaloo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ac91a4/32.png) [@SSgtBaloo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SSgtBaloo)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 2:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/4 "2001-01-03T02:56:42Z")

</div>

…It’s just such an important message that it bears repeating!

🙂

~~Baloo

[sub]Thanks for the setup, Stupendous man![/sub]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robby/32/11048_2.png) [@robby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/robby)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 3:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/5 "2001-01-03T03:09:13Z")

</div>

Both of the posts so far seem to have a common misconception about gravity, that is, if they are referring to low Earth orbit. (This is the orbital altitude of the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station.) At an orbit of about 600 km above the surface of the Earth, Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation indicates that an object’s weight is about 80% of what it would be on the surface of the Earth. The reason objects appear to be APPARENTLY “weightless” in low Earth orbit is NOT because they are particularly far from the Earth, but because they are in free-fall.

They are weightless for the same reason that passengers in a falling elevator (with a cut cable) would feel apparently weightless.

Referring to the statement, “There is still gravity, just not enough for you to be terribly affected by it,” the statement is completely erroneous. In fact, if one was not being affected by gravity, one would not stay in orbit, but would go off in a straight line.

If the discussion is referring to an situation deep in outer space, far from any massive object, the previous posted statements are OK. However, I have seen misconceptions about why objects in low Earth orbit are weightless time and again. It is particularly inexcusable in textbooks (typically introductory science textbooks).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SmackFu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/53a042/32.png) [@SmackFu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SmackFu)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 3:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/6 "2001-01-03T03:15:43Z")

</div>

Now aren’t normal bras designed under the assumption that gravity will push downwards? So would a bra designed to work in space have to provide “support” from all directions? Like a full cone? 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/7 "2001-01-03T03:16:33Z")

</div>

Yeah, well, let’s not wander too far afield here. The main point of the original question was clearly about bras, not about the finer points of weightlessness. Clearly, there’s a potential for serious eyestrain on the part of the male astronauts here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Upham](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Upham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Upham)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 3:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/8 "2001-01-03T03:30:37Z")

</div>

ohhh… space bra… technology AND sex…

the 21st centuary’s gonna rock!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 3:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/9 "2001-01-03T03:42:45Z")

</div>

Isaac Asimov’s novel _The Gods Themselves?!_ imagined a moon colony where women didn’t wear bras thanks to the low gravity and in fact went altogether topless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Green\_Bean](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/green_bean/32/1760_2.png) [@Green\_Bean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Green_Bean)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 3:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/10 "2001-01-03T03:52:10Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by smackfu \*  
> \*\*Now aren’t normal bras designed under the assumption that gravity will push downwards? So would a bra designed to work in space have to provide “support” from all directions? Like a full cone? 🙂 \*\*

Many sports bras are designed to minimize movement in all directions. Basically, they work by immobilizing the breasts, either by encapsulating them in supportive cups, or by smooshing them flat against the chest. There are many “light duty” sports bras that aren’t quite strong enough to stand up to, say, a jogging D-cup, but are still supportive enough for everyday activities–and they are frequently soft and comfy.

If I were to enter a weightless environment, I would certainly wear a bra. I would hate to have my boobies flapping around in _all_ directions at once. I would probably choose one of the soft sports bras.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Astroboy14](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/df705f/32.png) [@Astroboy14](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Astroboy14)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 4:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/11 "2001-01-03T04:08:30Z")

</div>

[homer] **Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm, boooobies!!!** [/homer]🙂

I would think that those female astronauts who were, uhm, less endowed wouldn’t need to wear a bra…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 4:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/12 "2001-01-03T04:49:56Z")

</div>

SF authors have considered this at some length.

Arthur C. Clarke in “Rendezvous with Rama” : “Weightlessness did things to their breasts that were too distrcting. He could think of several space accients that might have ben caused by the passage of unholstered female ersonnel.” (A semiquote from memory)

Robert Heinlein in “Expanded Universe” (praticaly the last page) “Just wait 'til you see what zero gravity does to a 100 centimeter bust.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 5:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/13 "2001-01-03T05:03:04Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Jomo Mojo \*  
> \*\*Isaac Asimov’s novel _The Gods Themselves?!_ imagined a moon colony where women didn’t wear bras thanks to the low gravity and in fact went altogether topless. \*\*

Of course the down side of this (NPI) is that when the astronettes get old, their breasts will sag **up.**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Phobos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Phobos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Phobos)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 1:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/14 "2001-01-03T13:52:34Z")

</div>

ok, I usually try to check into any thread about astronomy or the space program…and let me just say that this is one of the funniest questions on this subject that I’ve heard 🙂

I don’t know the answer to this one, but it seems like some women astronauts may want to wear 'em for control. Or at least to keep the male astronauts from leering all the time.

> [@](#):
>
> There is still gravity. You’re just too far away from the mass to be terribly affected by it.

Good point by **robby**. There’s still plenty of gravity up there (gravity is what keeps them in orbit)…it’s just that the shuttle is travelling so fast that the astronauts are kept in a state of free-fall, so it feels like there is no gravity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Milton\_De\_La\_Warre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e480ec/32.png) [@Milton\_De\_La\_Warre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Milton_De_La_Warre)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 5:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/15 "2001-01-03T17:48:13Z")

</div>

I read that it’s around 90F most of the time in the shuttle, so whatever undergarments they wear would have to be comfortable in the heat. I imagine they wear sport bras as a result.

How come no one has raised the related male issue on this: Boxers or briefs? Surely they don’t want their “packages” drifting about uncontrollably. One false move, and… well, you know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DonJuanDeMarco3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a87d85/32.png) [@DonJuanDeMarco3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonJuanDeMarco3)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 6:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/16 "2001-01-03T18:04:26Z")

</div>

I just wanted to know that if a female went through life in space, how would the seemingly weightless environment effect the developement of the breast. If my feild of expertise, I often encounter breasts effected by gravity very much so.  
I believe that is “wander[ing] to far afield”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![City\_Gent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a87d85/32.png) [@City\_Gent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/City_Gent)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2001, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/17 "2001-01-03T19:29:52Z")

</div>

Even though gravity is not a factor while in orbit, there are still inertial forces to deal with. You don’t want some voluptuous astronaut’s 44 DD’s flopping around like water balloons on rubber bands. Could be a safety hazard.

At this point, I would like to personally volunteer my consulting services in the area of women’s space underwear to NASA (or any other interested agency) for $10/hr. I’d offer more, but that’s all I can afford to pay.

There haven’t been any posts to this thread by women, have there? _snortle_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Montfort](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Montfort](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Montfort)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2001, 3:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/18 "2001-01-04T03:30:27Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Jomo Mojo \*  
> \*\*Isaac Asimov’s novel _The Gods Themselves?!_ imagined a moon colony where women didn’t wear bras thanks to the low gravity and in fact went altogether topless. \*\*

Someone, somewhere, sometime… ought to adapt this novel into a film. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Green\_Bean](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/green_bean/32/1760_2.png) [@Green\_Bean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Green_Bean)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2001, 5:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-astronauts-and-bras/48138/19 "2001-01-04T05:21:34Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by City Gent \*  
> \*\*There haven’t been any posts to this thread by women, have there? _snortle_ \*\*

What do I look like, chopped liver?
