# female ejaculation drawing

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [October 25, 2002, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879 "2002-10-25T19:48:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![owlofcreamcheese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/97f17d/32.png) [@owlofcreamcheese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/owlofcreamcheese)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2002, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/1 "2002-10-25T19:48:13Z")

</div>

[http://www.straightdope.com/columns/021025.html](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/021025.html)

okay, was it just me or was the drawing with that really really weird?

most of all the fact it looks like the cecil turkey has smelly feet… plus the fact hes spitting it out of his mouth like that… not to mention the fact that the machine has a face…

that was a question that gave us some new and interesting insight into mr cecil!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Opengrave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/919ad9/32.png) [@Opengrave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Opengrave)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2002, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/2 "2002-10-25T20:26:34Z")

</div>

Funny, I’ve noticed a lot of the **Sig** drawings to be pretty wierd but I almost started a thread on this one myself. Often the drawings have lots of hidden little goodies in the background.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saltire](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saltire/32/553_2.png) [@Saltire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saltire)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2002, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/3 "2002-10-25T22:55:09Z")

</div>

I think this also may be the first Slug Signorino depiction of Mrs. Adams. She seems…um…satisfied.

And her breasts aren’t triangular, like most of Slug’s drawings of women.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nametag](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nametag/32/406_2.png) [@Nametag](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nametag)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2002, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/4 "2002-10-25T23:19:22Z")

</div>

That’s not smelly feet, you silly owl, that’s “Sig,” the beginning of Slug’s signature. And Cecil is rather obviously not spitting it out, he’s stripping it off from his beak; apparently, that’s how he pleasured the provider of the sample. Finally, I work in a laboratory, and I assure you that all sexual-secretion analyzers have faces; that’s just how it is (no, really).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2002, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/5 "2002-10-26T00:53:37Z")

</div>

Huh. Based on the “identafluid” label, I assumed that the machine had first analyzed the spooje around the berobed chiquita’s feet, and was now proceeding to the character of the snot being blown from Cecilbird’s beak. I never would have concluded that the stream had been sucked from the lady’s orifice and then retransferred beakily to the machine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B.Pants](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a87d85/32.png) [@B.Pants](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/B.Pants)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2002, 2:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/6 "2002-10-26T14:29:46Z")

</div>

I’m just amused that the “Comments on Cecil’s Columns” link says underneath:  
Say what you really think. Please, don’t gush.  
But I thought gushing was precisely what we were talking about here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Adam\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ee7513/32.png) [@Adam\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Adam_P)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2002, 3:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/7 "2002-10-26T15:15:39Z")

</div>

I was actually surprised that both the questionner and Cecil claimed to have been doused in female ejaculate at some point. Neither I nor any of my friends have experienced a female cumshot. I always thought it was pretty rare, not more than 10% of women.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2002, 2:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/8 "2002-10-27T02:05:23Z")

</div>

In the er, uh, interest of science, I contribute that it occurred in 0 out of 14 samples.

So your ten percent, **Adam** sounds believable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atreyu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/5e9695/32.png) [@Atreyu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atreyu)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2002, 3:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/9 "2002-10-27T03:51:42Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _Quoted from Cecil’s article_  
> I agree it’s not a “lubricating secretion”–unlike the vaginal fluid produced during arousal, the ejaculate is watery and **somewhat acrid to the taste**

(emphasis added)

Is Cecil drawing a conclusion from a sample size of just one individual, or were multiple women sampled for this particular finding?

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2002, 5:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/10 "2002-10-28T05:21:17Z")

</div>

I had noted that drawing, as well, and the putative Mrs. Adams does, in fact, look well-pleased with her lot in life. On the other hand, we have Cecil’s rather uncharacteristic comment that he would rather not go into details. I mean, since when does Cecil hold back on details? I sincerely hope that his reluctance is not traceable to any current difficulties in the romance department.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beckisosmrt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c5a1d2/32.png) [@beckisosmrt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beckisosmrt)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2002, 6:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/female-ejaculation-drawing/133879/11 "2002-11-02T06:08:59Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Atreyu \*  
> \*\*
> 
> (emphasis added)
> 
> Is Cecil drawing a conclusion from a sample size of just one individual, or were multiple women sampled for this particular finding?
> 
> 😃 \*\*

lmfao…i was thinking the same thing…
