You said it for me, ** Miller.** I just love how he expresses sympathy for men accused of rape, but then blithely accuses women and feminists of desiring the elimination of men----*without any evidence at all. * Double standard much?
Okay, we finally know what the matter with the guy. I hate to use the medication thing, but really, if ever anybody justified that sort of speculation, this kind of unreal optomism…! The worst of it is, I really do think he believes it.
So, Andy, I guess that means you don’t have a cite, huh? Or what’s known in the real world as * proof*…
Satisfying Andy Licious writes:
> So the expert here is you. And you trump any actual studies
> done in the field.
No, read what I said. I said that “I suspect that the range of speakers at other colleges is greater.” “I suspect” means that I have personal experience that indicates the range is greater, although I haven’t done any survey or read any surveys myself. That’s why I was asking for a good survey, not one that was limited to a small set of departments in a small set of universities. The only survey you have quoted is limited. It’s a small and biased sample. I have personal experience to suspect that it’s not typical of all departments or of all colleges. Till such time as you offer us a good survey, there’s nothing to argue about.
> Finally an admission that anti-male feminists exist.
Are you bothering to read anything we write? We’ve all admitted that there are anti-male feminists. The only question is how common they are.
Everybody who denies that anti-male feminists exist, please raise your hand.
Anybody who can QUOTE someone in this thread saying, IN CONTEXT, that anti-male feminists don’t exist, please put up.
Daniel