# Fiction which is misrepresented in pop culture

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [June 23, 2013, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683 "2013-06-23T03:17:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hermione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/cdc98d/32.png) [@Hermione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hermione)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2013, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/161 "2013-11-06T01:48:12Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> Well, it’s based on the opera _La Boheme_, which had very similar characters, but with tuberculosis instead of AIDS. Like La Boheme, both had great music. Plus, standard-bending artists are always entertaining.

I’m in a unique position WRT _Rent._ I love it…I love the music and the message (insofar as the message is “don’t let yourself be consumed by cynicism and negativity, embrace life and love without fear”). But at the same time, I can understand where its detractors are coming from, and I think that if I met this kind of person in real life, I’d be mentally rolling my eyes the whole time.

I think that maybe part of it is the difference in the characters’ presentation between _La Boheme_ and _Rent._ In LB, both the Murger novel and (to a large extent) the Puccini opera, the bohemians are meant to look a little ridiculous. We get the sense that they’re not so much BEING starving artists as they are PLAYING at being starving artists–Rodolpho isn’t so much in love with his work that he doesn’t burn it for only a few minutes of heat; he had to know that the warmth wouldn’t last long. Though we sympathize with them, we laugh at them a bit as well.

More to the point, with Mimi’s death at the end, we see reality crashing in on their self-created fantasy–there’s absolutely nothing romantic or artistic about poverty when it leads to disease and death.

With _Rent,_ we don’t get that feeling that the bohemians are being ridiculous–we’re meant to sympathize with them being against The Man, even if it sometimes seems as if The Man has a point. Which is probably why they had Mimi live at the end, even if it may not be for much longer–the same message as LB wouldn’t have applied here. But then again, her survival at the end ties in with the overall message of \*Rent–\*it doesn’t matter in the end that Mimi is still living with a deadly disease, all that matters is to “give into love or live in fear.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2013, 1:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/162 "2013-11-06T13:03:13Z")

</div>

> [@Hermione](#):
>
> I’m in a unique position WRT _Rent._ I love it…I love the music and the message (insofar as the message is “don’t let yourself be consumed by cynicism and negativity, embrace life and love without fear”). But at the same time, I can understand where its detractors are coming from, and I think that if I met this kind of person in real life, I’d be mentally rolling my eyes the whole time.

While I agree with the rest of your analysis, I just want to point out that I don’t see this part as a valid reason for dismissing a work of art, or even disliking it. My favorite movies, plays, and television are _filled_ with people we wouldn’t want to have to interact with in real life. I’d probably punch any of Groucho Marx’s characters in the nose. Homer Simpson is a terrible individual. But they’re entertaining as hell when we can watch them from afar.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2013, 2:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/163 "2013-11-06T14:52:49Z")

</div>

Just want to nitpick “Richard Hooker.” That’s a composite pseudonynm. Hornberger was the “story” guy, but [W.C.l Heinz](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._C._Heinz) was the actual author of the words.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2013, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/164 "2013-11-06T15:23:04Z")

</div>

> [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](#):
>
> Just want to nitpick “Richard Hooker.” That’s a composite pseudonynm. Hornberger was the “story” guy, but [W.C.l Heinz](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._C._Heinz) was the actual author of the words.

I’d never heard of this before. Eveything I’d read suggested that Hornberger was the sole author. Certainly he was the only one they quoted about disagreement with the tone of the TV series.

The first two sequels to **M_A_S\*H** were apparently Hornberger’s work alone, according to the Wikipedia entries. I wonder if that explains their relative obscurity. Later M_A_S\*H sequels were ghostwritten.

> **[Richard Hooker (author)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._Richard_Hornberger)**
>
> Hiester Richard Hornberger Jr. (February 1, 1924 – November 4, 1997) was an American writer and surgeon who wrote under the pseudonym Richard Hooker. Hornberger's best-known work is his novel MASH (1968), based on his experiences as a wartime United States Army surgeon during the Korean War (1950–1953) and written in collaboration with W.C. Heinz. It was used as the basis for an award-winning, critically and commercially successful movie – M\*A\*S\*H (1970) — and two years later in an acclaimed lo...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ISiddiqui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/97f17d/32.png) [@ISiddiqui](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ISiddiqui)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2013, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/165 "2013-11-06T16:25:05Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> While I agree with the rest of your analysis, I just want to point out that I don’t see this part as a valid reason for dismissing a work of art, or even disliking it. My favorite movies, plays, and television are _filled_ with people we wouldn’t want to have to interact with in real life. I’d probably punch any of Groucho Marx’s characters in the nose. Homer Simpson is a terrible individual. But they’re entertaining as hell when we can watch them from afar.

I think what **Hermione** was getting at is the bit different though. We ask asked at times to sympathize with Homer Simpson, but we aren’t supposed to believe that his lifestyle is good or his choices are good (in fact, just the opposite - we are supposed to sympathize with Homer even though he makes horrible choices that no one should ever make). Rent, at some level, seems to imply that we should applaud these artists for their lifestyle and their choices.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Excellent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f19dbf/32.png) [@Mr.Excellent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Excellent)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2013, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/166 "2013-11-06T16:50:43Z")

</div>

> [@Ethilrist](#):
>
> Frankenstein? Ain’t the monster. He’s the guy who made The Monster.

Oh, he’s certainly the monster. He’s just not the creature assembled from dead men.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2013, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/167 "2013-11-06T18:29:29Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Excellent](#):
>
> Oh, he’s certainly the monster. He’s just not the creature assembled from dead men.

Well, that second part is also not accurate. . . probably. The book doesn’t describe how the monster was created, whether from exisiting tissue or tissue created in a laboratory. It does describe Frankenstein’s trying to find the secret of life by examining dead bodies and carcasses from slaughterhouses, but on the actual creation itself, El Zippo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furryman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/furryman/32/99_2.png) [@furryman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furryman)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2013, 6:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/168 "2013-11-07T06:20:03Z")

</div>

Going back to the OP I personally find it hard to believe that anyone would think Zapp Branagan was anything more than a broad parody of Capt. Kirk, On the other hand a lot of people believe that Kirk slept with lots of women, which isn’t true.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2013, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/169 "2013-11-07T15:55:41Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> Atlas Shrugged is not about “screw the poor”. It is a cautionary tale against the corrupting nature of collectivism. That when people feel entitled to take from those who create to give to those who can’t or won’t, it ultimately hurts the poor by destroying the businesses they could have worked for, stopping production on the products and services they could have benefited from.

Ah, “trickle down” economics. So it’s even worse than we thought!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2013, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/170 "2013-11-07T17:13:30Z")

</div>

John Norman’s Gor novels are often misrepresented as being nonstop X-rated sex slavery porn. In point of fact, they have very few sex scenes in them, and even fewer sexual bondage scenes, and those that DO exist are generally not at all sexually explicit, more soft R than anything else, and a very soft R at that.

However, the female character do tend to be slaves, and there’s generally a romantic relationship of some kind between her and one of the male characters, and she also responds sexually to her slavery (in Norman’s stilted way). This creates the IMPRESSION of nonstop sex scenes, but in point of fact they just aren’t there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2013, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/171 "2013-11-07T21:17:49Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> I’d never heard of this before. Eveything I’d read suggested that Hornberger was the sole author. Certainly he was the only one they quoted about disagreement with the tone of the TV series.
> 
> The first two sequels to **M_A_S\*H** were apparently Hornberger’s work alone, according to the Wikipedia entries. I wonder if that explains their relative obscurity. Later M_A_S\*H sequels were ghostwritten.
> 
> [Richard Hooker (author) - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._Richard_Hornberger)

From your link

> [@](#):
>
> Hornberger worked eleven years on his debut novel, MASH, which was rejected by many publishers. He worked with the famed sportswriter, W.C. Heinz, to revise it. A year later, the book was acquired by William Morrow and Company.[2]

The sequels not by him (the Wiki entry says of dubious literary merit, which is putting it mildly) were accessible to fans of the TV series, while his sequels (and the last was written after all or most of the TV sequels) were more true to the characters from the novel. I also suspect the TV spinoffs got more heavily marketed. I could only stand to read one of them, but there is no continuity between them and the real “Hooker” books.  
I don’t remember if Henry Blake is alive in the TV spinoffs. I seem to remember him being there, but it has been a while.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![seal\_cleaner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e274bd/32.png) [@seal\_cleaner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/seal_cleaner)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/172 "2013-11-10T01:44:44Z")

</div>

I seem to remember Frankenstein’s monster’s name as “Adam.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![furryman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/furryman/32/99_2.png) [@furryman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/furryman)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 8:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/173 "2013-11-10T08:40:39Z")

</div>

> [@seal\_cleaner](#):
>
> I seem to remember Frankenstein’s monster’s name as “Adam.”

Adam was the name of the Frankenstein’s monster ripoff on Dark Shadows.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![seal\_cleaner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e274bd/32.png) [@seal\_cleaner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/seal_cleaner)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 11:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/174 "2013-11-10T11:54:11Z")

</div>

Jesus, I can’t let people think I watched that show! So I found the reference - the monster refers to himself as “the Adam of your labours” when talking to Victor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 1:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/175 "2013-11-10T13:33:01Z")

</div>

> [@Evil\_Captor](#):
>
> Ah, “trickle down” economics. So it’s even worse than we thought!

No, it’s about the rather basic observation that if you completely sever the connection between what a person does and what happens to them, that they become irresponsible. At least as embodied in the Soviet Union, collectivism _DID_ produce a society of sullen goldbricks who did the shoddiest work they could get away with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C_K_Dexter_Haven)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/176 "2013-11-10T15:38:15Z")

</div>

The portrayal of Don Quixote as an idealist. The books portray him as just plain out of his mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/177 "2013-11-10T18:22:11Z")

</div>

> [@Diceman](#):
>
> On a different note, I have to wonder why the play _Rent_ is held in high regard.

By whom? I’d pay good money to NOT sit through it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hermione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/cdc98d/32.png) [@Hermione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hermione)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/178 "2013-11-10T19:21:41Z")

</div>

> [@seal\_cleaner](#):
>
> Jesus, I can’t let people think I watched that show! So I found the reference - the monster refers to himself as “the Adam of your labours” when talking to Victor.

I’m not sure, but I think that a nineteenth-century stage version also named the creature “Adam.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sciurophobic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cab0a1/32.png) [@sciurophobic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sciurophobic)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/179 "2013-11-10T19:50:58Z")

</div>

> [@Diceman](#):
>
> On a different note, I have to wonder why the play _Rent_ is held in high regard. I’ve seen it recently. For those who haven’t seen it (probably most of you), the characters all have AIDS and are living in a shitty run-down loft in New York.
> 
> The thing is, the characters are pretty much all unlikeable losers. Most of them seem content to just mope around waiting to die from AIDS. Only one character is determined to make something of himself. He lands a job as a photojournalist, but this is portrayed as a major mistake, and by the end of the play he quits the job and is back to being a professional welfare bum with his buddies :rolleyes:
> 
> It really did make me wonder what the appeal of this play is supposed to be.

I agree. _Rent_ makes me want to vote Republican.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LibrarySpy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f9ae1b/32.png) [@LibrarySpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LibrarySpy)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2013, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683/180 "2013-11-10T20:47:17Z")

</div>

> [@Diceman](#):
>
> The thing is, the characters are pretty much all unlikeable losers. Most of them seem content to just mope around waiting to die from AIDS. Only one character is determined to make something of himself. He lands a job as a photojournalist, but this is portrayed as a major mistake, and by the end of the play he quits the job and is back to being a professional welfare bum with his buddies

Disaffected youth are disaffected. It’s a major theme in _Rent_, _American Idiot_, _Spring Awakening_, _Picnic_ and probably a number of other musicals and plays. Maybe even an update of _Catcher in the Rye_.

It’s just a trope, guys.

> [@Hermione](#):
>
> We get the sense that they’re not so much BEING starving artists as they are PLAYING at being starving artists

I think this comes across in the musical, too. The two leads are privileged white males, both from comfortable middle class existences willing to take them back in, but they’d rather live in a shithole. Why? That’s what some people do in their 20s.

For the non-white characters, it’s a depiction of extreme poverty, homelessness, AIDS, mental illness, and discrimination. Who wouldn’t want to sing and dance to that?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fiction-which-is-misrepresented-in-pop-culture/661683.md?page=10)
