# Fictional works that are revealed to be fictionally fictional

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [November 26, 2013, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866 "2013-11-26T23:19:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2013, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/81 "2013-12-02T16:49:29Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> eta: I would suspect that the hard standard of \*‘narrator states at end that it was all a complete lie’ \*is not often met. We humans are fascinated by deception, but deliberate deception on that scale–a claim, in essence, that we’ve been made fools of for the entire length of the work–would meet with so much resentment that the work in question might not find a publisher/filmmaker.

That was precisely my reaction to the Buffy episode mentioned above, “Never Again.” It postulated that Buffy was a psychiatric patient who created the Buffyverse as a result of her mental delusions, thereby rendering the entire show nothing but the dreams of a mad woman.

To say I was displeased would be an understatement. I understand that TV shows/books/movies/etc aren’t “real”, but they should be “real” within the context of the story!

And though I rarely watched the show, the ending of _Newhart_ struck me as an entire slap in the face of all the fans of the show, especially fans of the supporting characters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ferret\_Herder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e47774/32.png) [@Ferret\_Herder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ferret_Herder)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2013, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/82 "2013-12-02T16:58:15Z")

</div>

I had a close-but-no-cigar, in that I wanted to say that in the text near but not at the end, the story of the house at the center of the book **House of Leaves** is called into question (but whether it’s the truthfulness of the events, the existence of the film about them, or what, I’m not sure) by one of its commenting editors.

However, working backwards from the end of the book (not counting appendices), I didn’t find it where I thought it should be and stopped hunting for it, and in that book it’s kind of understandable if you confuse things and start questioning if it has a traditional “end” anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astorian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@astorian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astorian)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2013, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/83 "2013-12-02T18:24:55Z")

</div>

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> And though I rarely watched the show, the ending of _Newhart_ struck me as an entire slap in the face of all the fans of the show, especially fans of the supporting characters.

Well, I’m sorry you took it that way. You’re entitled to your feelings.

But I think MOST viewers, and most of Bob Newhart’s most loyal fans, thought that was a delightfully clever and quirky ending to a delightfully quirky series.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2013, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/84 "2013-12-02T18:29:03Z")

</div>

> [@Jragon](#):
>
> The webcomic Order of the Stick seems to exist in a limbo state where it’s not entirely clear whether the characters live in a universe that happens to have comic and narrative rules as real as our laws of physics, or if they’re simply self aware that they’re in a comic.

There are multiple times where characters in the comic say things like, “this isn’t that kind of comic.” Plus, there’s that time Haley broke into the cast page to steal a diamond from herself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cher3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/da6949/32.png) [@cher3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cher3)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2013, 7:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/85 "2013-12-02T19:15:31Z")

</div>

It doesn’t come at the end, but in Gillian Flynn’s _Gone Girl_, the diary of one of the characters (which we have been reading) is revealed to have been fictional.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2013, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/86 "2013-12-02T19:24:34Z")

</div>

Back in the 1960’s/1970’s, DC comics would put out stories regarding Superman or Batman that weren’t to be considered part of the “canon” and labeled them “Imaginary Stories”. Usually they advertised that on the cover, but some of the earlier ones, IIRC, didn’t clue in the reader until the end of the story. I missed one of those clues once, and spent a couple of months thinking Luthor had actually killed Superman.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2013, 7:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/87 "2013-12-02T19:41:54Z")

</div>

> [@astorian](#):
>
> Well, I’m sorry you took it that way. You’re entitled to your feelings.
> 
> But I think MOST viewers, and most of Bob Newhart’s most loyal fans, thought that was a delightfully clever and quirky ending to a delightfully quirky series.

No, I clearly understand I’m in the minority with this opinion. And _Newhart_ is apparently the one time this trick did work.

Doesn’t make it any less bothersome to me, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2013, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/88 "2013-12-02T21:10:01Z")

</div>

> [@astorian](#):
>
> Well, I’m sorry you took it that way. You’re entitled to your feelings.
> 
> But I think MOST viewers, and most of Bob Newhart’s most loyal fans, thought that was a delightfully clever and quirky ending to a delightfully quirky series.

Possibly it makes a difference (to the proportion of viewers who like the ending versus the proportion who disliked it) that _Newhart_ was a comedy.

We seem to accept that sort of playing-with-narrative better when the story doesn’t purport to be “serious.” (And _Newhart_ had a lot of rather surreal elements to begin with.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2013, 10:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/89 "2013-12-03T10:02:03Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> Possibly it makes a difference (to the proportion of viewers who like the ending versus the proportion who disliked it) that _Newhart_ was a comedy.
> 
> We seem to accept that sort of playing-with-narrative better when the story doesn’t purport to be “serious.” (And _Newhart_ had a lot of rather surreal elements to begin with.)

Well, yes. When Bob Newhart did it, it was funny. When _Dallas_ did it, it was a dick move.

And then there’s [this](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvSu65EAdGk). Which, from the looks of it, has come around to awesome again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![drewtwo99](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d07c76/32.png) [@drewtwo99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/drewtwo99)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2013, 10:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/90 "2013-12-03T10:11:05Z")

</div>

I just remembered that the end of Babylon 5, it is revealed that you have been watching a documentary or something about the events that actually happened in the past on the Babylon 5 station.

So really, it’s kind of saying that whatever actually happened on Babylon 5 was probably pretty close to the 5 seasons you saw, but it was a dramatization/recreation/documentary of the events. So, who knows.

I think this fits what the OP is looking for very well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2013, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/91 "2013-12-03T20:35:58Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Well, yes. When Bob Newhart did it, it was funny. When _Dallas_ did it, it was a dick move.  
> …

SPOILERS for “Dallas” follow. (I’m going to assume that this is so much a part of our common pop culture knowledge, now, that these comments don’t have to be actually hidden under tags.)

The reaction to the Dallas “Bobby in the shower” twist is fascinating. People were angry that the storylines from the season after Bobby’s death—revealed to be part of a dream by the wife of the Bobby character—“didn’t happen.”

Well, of course they Didn’t Happen. And those who complained _knew_ that they didn’t “happen” in real world. They never happened at all, and wouldn’t have happened whether Bobby appeared in that shower or not.

But in some sense, in some important way, whether the fictional events “happened” in the world of the show, or (alternatively) in the world of the show were only a dream, mattered. Mattered quite a lot.

This was a revealing episode in our understanding of what fiction does for us (if I may be so pedantic as to point out).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2013, 8:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/92 "2013-12-03T20:51:35Z")

</div>

Yup. Stories aren’t real but they should be “real” _within the context of the story_. Hence the Dallas outrage.

It worked for Newhart because, eh, I don’t know. Maybe I should watch it someday.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2013, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866/93 "2013-12-03T21:25:10Z")

</div>

Just remembered Guilty Conscience, where brilliant defense attorney Anthony Hopkins imagines scenario after scenario in which he murders his wife Blythe Danner but then fails to get away with it.

Eventually that falls by the wayside and the bulk of the movie gets going, as his wife and his mistress reveal that they’ve been conspiring to murder _ **him** _; he’s at gunpoint, but amiably plays killjoy to them pretty much like he’d just been doing for himself: walking them through how their perfect crime would promptly fall apart as soon as the cops ask _this_ obvious question or talk to _that_ witness they’d forgotten about, and so on, and so on.

They argue back – after all, maybe he’s just trying to talk his way out of getting killed, and is bluffing as fast as he can, right? So all three of 'em debate, and it goes back and forth, and it ends badly, and then…

…no, wait; none of that actually happened; his wife and mistress never confronted him; he’s been imagining the bulk of the movie as just one more scenario this whole time; that’s who he is, that’s what he does: daydream about his wife and murder, picturing it all in his mind’s eye. And that’s right about when the movie ends, as his wife arrives home to swiftly and simply kill him for real.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fictional-works-that-are-revealed-to-be-fictionally-fictional/674866.md?page=4)
