In another life, I was an auto mechanic, 40-50 years ago. The shops I worked at didn’t particularly like to install parts supplied by the customer but it was often done. Some of the issues include, lack of ability to have made the initial “diagnosis” as the customer wandered in the door asking for a part to be replaced as he’d made the decision as to “what was wrong”. Then he could be mad if it doesn’t “fix his problem” but he still owes the labour.
Another issue was warranty. Customers rightly expect that if their car is repaired it is indeed repaired. The places I worked at commonly offered 90 days parts and labour warranty on numerous repairs. If the part the customer supplied fails early, will he still blame the shop for alleged faulty labour when it’s not our fault? What happens if the part he supplied is defective immediately? Does he understand he’s paying labour again?
When we supplied the part as well as the labour, then the customer knew he had “one stop” to make if there was a problem during warranty period. It was “on us” to make good. That was our preference as well as we were more likely to have a customer who felt he got a fair shake.
I was doing this work when most parts were made in North America and usually very reliable. I can only imagine the issues today when many parts are made in Asia under very inferior and questionable conditions leading to a higher probability of premature failure.