# First day revenue?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [March 22, 2004, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736 "2004-03-22T18:39:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/cc9497/32.png) [@jack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jack)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2004, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/61 "2004-04-03T21:39:49Z")

</div>

I see that I haven’t logged on or posted a message in four years (wow!), but I subscribed, just to get that charter member thing under my name. Such a deal at 5 bucks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2004, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/62 "2004-04-05T14:02:06Z")

</div>

> [@Ed Zotti](#):
>
> 2,500 subscribers as of 11:30 p.m. Fri., 4/2. Contentment has been achieved, the upper levels of happiness are within reach …

103 more folks subscribed over the weekend. As of 0900 CDT Monday, April 5th, the count is at 2,603.

Only 397 more to reach the makic 3K … and the upper levels of happiness!

Last week, the SDMB gained subscribers at a consistent clip of about 70 a day. Wonder how it will be this week?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kabbes](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/e99b99/32.png) [@kabbes](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kabbes)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2004, 12:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/63 "2004-04-06T12:37:01Z")

</div>

> [@bordelond](#):
>
> 103 more folks subscribed over the weekend. As of 0900 CDT Monday, April 5th, the count is at 2,603.
> 
> Only 397 more to reach the makic 3K … and the upper levels of happiness!
> 
> Last week, the SDMB gained subscribers at a consistent clip of about 70 a day. Wonder how it will be this week?

I make it 2,634 almost exactly 24 hours later. That means that 70 a day has slowed to more like 30 a day. I’m still interested to see how the predictive models stand up to reality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Algernon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a183cd/32.png) [@Algernon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Algernon)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2004, 1:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/64 "2004-04-06T13:09:18Z")

</div>

The 70 per day is an anomaly anyway.

In 2003 new members joined at a rate of 38 per day.  
In 2002 new members joined at a rate of 27 per day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Schnitte](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/schnitte/32/9033_2.png) [@Schnitte](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Schnitte)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2004, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/65 "2004-04-06T14:00:05Z")

</div>

> [@jack](#):
>
> I see that I haven’t logged on or posted a message in four years (wow!), but I subscribed, just to get that charter member thing under my name. Such a deal at 5 bucks.

It’s mostly vanity driving people to this Board. Think about how the SDMB would explode if the administrators introduced titles for posters that get funkier the higher your post count is.

I registered today, and I surely benefit from the dollar’s current weakness. The $4.95 worked out to charge my PayPal account (specially registered for this purpose) only 4.22 euros. Hah!

(Strategic registration timing, folks, that’s it)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2004, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/66 "2004-04-06T14:15:11Z")

</div>

> [@kabbes](#):
>
> I make it 2,634 almost exactly 24 hours later. That means that 70 a day has slowed to more like 30 a day. I’m still interested to see how the predictive models stand up to reality.

I just now (0910 CDT) got a count of 2,663. I am counting the SDSAB folks together with the Charter Members – AFAIK, virtually all the SDSAB are paid up. Even if a few Advisory Board people are getting comped, the figures aren’t skewed much anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2004, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/67 "2004-04-06T14:17:37Z")

</div>

> [@Algernon](#):
>
> The 70 per day is an anomaly anyway.
> 
> In 2003 new members joined at a rate of 38 per day.  
> In 2002 new members joined at a rate of 27 per day.

Right … no one that I know of expects a particularly high rate of subscribers past April 21st.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Algernon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a183cd/32.png) [@Algernon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Algernon)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2004, 2:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/68 "2004-04-06T14:21:54Z")

</div>

> [@bordelond](#):
>
> Right … no one that I know of expects a particularly high rate of subscribers past April 21st.

It will be interesting to watch. Some of the Charter Members signing up right now are in fact complete newbies. I suspect the _registration_ rate (which will include Guests) will stay about the same as in previous years. I agree that the _subscription_ rate will slow greatly after April 21.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shrinking\_Violet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df705f/32.png) [@Shrinking\_Violet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shrinking_Violet)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 9:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/69 "2004-04-07T09:48:31Z")

</div>

I wonder how many people have subscribed but not posted since, and so their status is not yet showing up as “Charter Member”? Could skew the figures somewhat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/70 "2004-04-07T14:27:08Z")

</div>

This morning’s count (0920 CDT):

**2,687** w/o SDSAB  
\*\*2,706 \*\* with SDSAB

…

I’m torn as to whether to coung SDSAB or not. I know some of them have, in fact, paid. The easiest solution, ISTM, is just to give a dual count.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shijinn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@shijinn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/shijinn)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/71 "2004-04-07T16:59:06Z")

</div>

> [@Shrinking Violet](#):
>
> I wonder how many people have subscribed but not posted since, and so their status is not yet showing up as “Charter Member”? Could skew the figures somewhat.

my guess is not many. surely it irks to see your status unchanged after paying for it, so you either test post or complain post or something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chula](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a4c791/32.png) [@chula](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chula)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/72 "2004-04-07T18:24:55Z")

</div>

> [@shijinn](#):
>
> my guess is not many. surely it irks to see your status unchanged after paying for it, so you either test post or complain post or something.

Well, this is my first post since I signed up. It hadn’t occurred to me that my status didn’t automatically change. And I don’t really care about my status. I’ve been too busy to visit much and wouldn’t have signed up if I hadn’t gotten the email. I can’t be the only one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/73 "2004-04-07T18:26:40Z")

</div>

We should have [a decent uptick in subscriptions](http://www.livejournal.com/community/sdmb_anonymous/41519.html?view=2123823#t2123823) starting around the 19th of this month:

> [@](#):
>
> **There’s still a month to go, people! I’m an old timer and I don’t pay any bill ahead of the due date.**

What I wonder is will there be 100 or so procrastinators, or more like 300-400?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 9:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/74 "2004-04-07T21:13:08Z")

</div>

This afternoon’s count (1610 CDT):

**2,705** without the SDSAB  
\*\*2,724 \*\* counting the SDSAB

…

**Kabbes** , at current pace, 2,800 should be eclipsed sometime over the weekend. I think we still have a significant “procrastinators’ effect” to consider as well.

295 away from 3,000!

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Una\_Persson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/una_persson/32/346_2.png) [@Una\_Persson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Una_Persson)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/75 "2004-04-07T21:39:20Z")

</div>

> [@bordelond](#):
>
> I’m torn as to whether to coung SDSAB or not. I know some of them have, in fact, paid. The easiest solution, ISTM, is just to give a dual count.

If you want to make things really exact, I paid. Q.E.D. says he paid, so there’s 2 you know of. Less uncertainty…kinda.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earthling](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/90db22/32.png) [@Earthling](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earthling)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2004, 6:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/76 "2004-04-08T06:53:36Z")

</div>

> [@chula](#):
>
> > [@shijinn](#):
> >
> > > [@Shrinking Violet](#):
> > >
> > > I wonder how many people have subscribed but not posted since, and so their status is not yet showing up as “Charter Member”? Could skew the figures somewhat.
> > 
> > my guess is not many. surely it irks to see your status unchanged after paying for it, so you either test post or complain post or something.
> 
> Well, this is my first post since I signed up. It hadn’t occurred to me that my status didn’t automatically change. And I don’t really care about my status. I’ve been too busy to visit much and wouldn’t have signed up if I hadn’t gotten the email. I can’t be the only one.

I’ve been tracking subscription data (as have others, as seen in this thread) and just found out that if you’ve paid, you’ll show up as a Charter Member in the Forum Leaders page, whether you’ve posted since paying or not. In fact, there is at least one Charter Member with 0 posts to his/her name. I don’t know if your new title shows up in thread views without posting, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UncleBeer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/977dab/32.png) [@UncleBeer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UncleBeer)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2004, 12:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/77 "2004-04-08T12:46:34Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> If you want to make things really exact, I paid. Q.E.D. says he paid, so there’s 2 you know of. Less uncertainty…kinda.

And UB makes three; I paid, too, because I wanted to be able to search before they got around to updating my status.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2004, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/78 "2004-04-08T14:06:23Z")

</div>

We had a nice little run last night. This morning’s count (0905 CDT):

**2,738** Charter Members  
\*\*2,741 \*\* Charter Members + confirmed paid SDSAB  
\*\*2,757 \*\* Charter Members + all SDSAB

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![umop\_ap\_sdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/dbc845/32.png) [@umop\_ap\_sdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/umop_ap_sdn)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2004, 6:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/79 "2004-04-08T18:42:44Z")

</div>

> [@Earthling](#):
>
> I don’t know if your new title shows up in thread views without posting, though.

It doesn’t. There’s a big long thread someplace where all the Charter Members posted to see their status updated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2004, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736/80 "2004-04-09T14:03:44Z")

</div>

This morning’s count (0900 CDT):

**2,769** Charter Members  
**2,772** Charter Members + confirmed paid SDSAB  
\*\*2,788 \*\* Charter Members + all SDSAB

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/first-day-revenue/235736.md?page=5)
