Flag at half mast used to mean something

You don’t mean that. Think about it–that would mean the loss of countless useful words.

No, it wouldn’t. If they are useful, they are currently being used.

The problem though is that dictionaries are descriptions of what words are in common use. Some contain obsolete words, but a good dictionary will label them as such. What he’s really arguing is that the dictionary is out of date.

Real prescriptivists don’t take any dictionary as gospel.

I know how!

No one used the term “half mast” between the post where ascenray pointed this out and your post. How about instead of getting all worked up over a “bunch of freaking illiterates” you work on your reading comprehension skills?

What if they are widely misused as synonyms for other words that previously had different meanings? When the distinction is lost, the utility is lost, even if people continue to make the sounds with their mouths.

That’s as far as I’ll take this here.

Wow, that’s great! Very impressive. I’m so proud of and happy for you.
*… tap …

… tap tap tap …

… TAP …

… TAP TAP …*

Well?

Are you going to tell me?

The flag above Buckingham Palace is only flown at half-mast/staff/IDon’tCare when the reigning monarch dies.

Which is why it didn’t occur to Queen Liz to lower the flag when her ex-daughter-in-law died, but the Dianamania at the time forced her to concede.

How about you get a life, Sport?

Your ‘real prescriptivists’ sound like descriptivists to me.

If it was that important to maintain the differentiation between concepts, the distinct words would survive. For example, in English ‘blue’ and ‘green’ are not in any danger of becoming synonyms, regardless of the Sinitic influences that brought us idioms like ‘long time no see’: Our culture regards them as distinct, and regards the distinction as important, so the words remain separate.

Contrast this ‘half-staff’/‘half-mast’ nonsense, which is only relevant to a small number of people who exert very little influence on the language.

Or for that matter, “hero.” Not everyone who risks their life is a hero - most of the time, they’re just doing their duty. Rule of thumb: if the other soldiers (or cops, or firefighters) serving with you think you’re a hero, *then *you’re a hero..

Everyone please cool it re: half-staff or half-mast. It’s been beaten to death and everyone’s prickly over it. We need not discuss it any more, nor do we need to snipe about it.

Ellen Cherry
IMHO Moderator

:smiley:

Hey! Snipe is not a bad word

You rest it on your shoulder as you fold it into that classic, triangular shape.

Yeah, I remember WW2 when our boys were dying somewhere every day of that war, yet we generally let all of our flags fly high unless there was a very “unusual” or out-of-the-ordinary death that needed special recognition.

Sensible. Like, say, the last remaining veteran of one of our great wars.

Oh. I think I can see that. But how does one person fold it in quarters length-wise? Do you cheat and fold it in half first so it doesn’t drag on the ground?

That was a very out-of-the-ordinary death, though, as pointed out. That day and flag-lowering honored the passing of the last WWI vet of the US.

Oh yeah, that’s another good one - I like Stephen Colbert’s lampooning of the way everyone who gets their taxes done on time is a hero these days.

So “half-pole” would be correct, too.