It’s just you. (gag).
I hope you’re not thinking of the person I think you’re thinking of.
NAY!!!
There’s a couple of hotties. Kelly Ann Fitzpatrick, Monica Crowley, Heck, even Peggy Noonan is sort of hot for an older broad.
Not Ann Colter.
Two words: Laurie Duhe. […please, heart, stop that!..]
Yes, I was thinking about Annie Coulter!
No, really. I was not referring to the news readers at FNC either (Linda Vester, Laurie Dhue and the rest of the extremely-short-skirt gang) but the self-proclaimed analysts who keep poppin’ up on all shows on the side of the Religious Right in particular. After some googling, here’s some names, all blondes, in no particular order:
Monica Crawley
Kelly Ann Fitzpatrick
Laura Ingraham
Kathleen Parker
Debbie Schlussel
Ann Coulter
(the last two try hard, and for fetishists, they could be, well, very attractive!)
I have named names!
(I still think there are a few more out there)
Fox News? I’m not familiar with that channel. It does sound an awful lot like one we do get, it’s called Logical Fallacy Land.
Is it anything like the Contradiction News Network? Or the Mostly Stupid News By Cretins?
That’s funny! I laughed out loud. Thanks, I needed that.
I sure hope she does…
d&r
I could have sworn you were going to confess your unrequited lust for Tammy Faye Bakker. 
Is she the one on the 700 club? (if yes, I confess)
I find it amusing that the liberals used to tell conservatives to stop bitching and moaning about the liberal bias in the media. Now, that there is one network who is not left leaning they can’t stop bitching and moaning about it.
The liberal bias on the networks was imaginary. The right-wing agenda on Fox is real.
And I’m the Queen of Bavaria.
Anyone’s perceptions of bias in the media are going to be informed by their own bias, inherently. Lib will see CNN as left wing and Fox as fairly moderate. Dio will see the liberal bias of the networks as imaginary and the right-wing agenda on Fox as real.
In the end, I think that objectivity is absolutely impossible. Therefore, the logical solution is to read widely, and subject your own ideas to the same critical analysis you apply to anyone else’s. All you really need is broad-mindedness.
-Ulterior
PS: I was in NYC in the spring of 2000, watching Fox News as an innocent Canuck, on the day that the American pilots were returned from China. The anchor got “China” confused with “Japan” twice… e.g. “Hainan Island, off Japan”. I don’t remember who the anchor was. I don’t think this has an effect on whether they’re left wing or right wing; but I do think it means that they have a tendency to hire total ditzes.
Cite?
I’ve cited Harriss and Gallup polls. I cited WALTER CRONKITE. You are more an expert on the media that Newsweek bureau chiefs and Walter Cronkite?
Yeah, but I bet the Talking Head had a great haircut…
The on-camera people just read what is written in many cases. They try to put out Pretty Faces(both sexes). The bias is the writer, not the reader.
Ulterior wrote:
No, I see CNN as left wing and Fox as right wing.
For example, Fox loves to point out the irony in the actions of certain liberals vis-a-vis their alleged principles (e.g., the speakers at the Wellstone wake/rally). But I recently lambasted Fox for failing to point out the irony of a Republican president (who should be working to reduce government’s size) who is creating a whole new huge cabinet-level federal bureaucracy.
I’m neither left nor right wing. I’m libertarian.
Both CNN and Fox are libert-wing. When is the libertarian bias in mainstream media going to end?
Even Rush Limbaugh now says the media is conservative, not liberal.
Cite?