I must be hopeless, then, because this analogy seems off-base to me. It seems that a more accurate scenario would be: my neighbor sees that in order to open the door to my house, I have to say ‘Open Sesame.’ He then asks me if that phrase is symbolic, or if it is just two words that I picked at random.
Reread my question. I didn’t ask for the ‘combo to the safe’. And I’m not ‘really curious as to what’s in there!’ I asked the meaning behind the words that they use. I didn’t ask what the insides of the lodge look like.
Well, I was hoping my innocent facade would hold up longer, but I see it is useless to deny it any further now that I am confronted by your cynicism. Yes, I make up stories to post on internet message boards in order to get attention. I apologize for this charade, Monty.
Until I met this man, I was under the assumption that masons were primarily anglo-saxon. What exactly do you think I’m making up now? That I really didn’t get the impression that he didn’t identify with other types of masons?
I really don’t see how I can prove to you that this conversation actually took place in this manner, short of introducing you to this man in person. You’ll notice that I didn’t actually bring this up until Spritle asked me the reason for my questions. If I was really going to take the time to fabricate this story, why wouldn’t I have just posted it in the OP?
Again, I asked him what degree of masonry he was. He didn’t tell me. This has absolutely nothing to do with my question. I wanted to know the meaning behind the passwords, I really wasn’t interested in sharing my ‘BS’ story about a mason with everyone.
The difference is that someone’s ISP password is used by just one person. Thus, its likely to have a very limited significance, and its symbolism is probably only relevant to that one person. With the masons’ passwords, however, they are used by many people, and thus its significance is probably relevant to more than just one person. That is why I’m asking about the origin of their passwords, rather than the password to Monty’s hotmail account.
Which is why I asked it on this message board. A typical response in GQ includes factual information, often from both sides of an issue. Very rarely do I see responses in this forum actually attacking the reason for asking a question, rather than the question itself.
So you’re telling me that there is information and history out there that I can just never know? Because I’m not a part of this group? I can’t think of any other example where this holds true, except in matters of national security.
So then do you consider historians and etymologists to be imposters? All I’m interested in is the background on words. I have no intention of hoodwinking someone.
Chronos, yes I read that article. It didn’t really cover the stuff that I am looking for though.
Coolestwhiteboy, thanks I’ll check that movie out some time.
flowbark, I tried going to the masonicinfo.com link, but it didn’t work. I would be interested in seeing an official response, especially if it goes into specifics. Alot of the sites out there seem to be primarily focused on conspiracies rather than the actual history of the masons.
Is this the right link?
Spritle said:
Don’t confuse having a sense of civility with being a wuss. As to the final part of your post…I really don’t see any sense of hysteria in my OP, so your sarcasm seems to be misplaced.