# Fried Dough Ho Needs to Go

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fried-dough-ho-needs-to-go/566066>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 1, 2011, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fried-dough-ho-needs-to-go/566066 "2011-01-01T18:27:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2011, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fried-dough-ho-needs-to-go/566066/10 "2011-01-01T20:02:16Z")

</div>

Well, I don’t think **Fried Dough Ho** needs to go ( heh ). I haven’t noticed her as being a particularly egregious poster before, though I think I’ve mostly seen her chiming in in foodie threads so maybe I’ve missed something. And **Cisco** did kind of overreact for the forum he was in and deserved an admonition to tone it down or take it to the Pit. But **FDH** does deserve the pitting.

I don’t blame **Cisco** at all for being annoyed. **FDH** insinuation was out of line and really rather silly. Even if **Cisco** hadn’t mentioned her bogus age in the OP, I can’t see why any savvy person would believe that a.) a porn website dedicated to a young look would be representing her true age and b.) that ANY _commercial_ porn website would dare use an underage model in this day and age. Let alone that they would have been doing so for years, since she was a pre-teen :eek: . I’ll be charitable and chalk it up to just a brainfart on **FDH** ’s part, but it was a bad one and deserves a little slap down.

The comment **Zsofia** noted was also a little unpleasant. But what also caught my eye was conflating “Tawnee Stone” with pre-teen anything.

> [@It seems Tawnee Stone may have died \[she's alive- ed. title\]](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-seems-tawnee-stone-may-have-died-shes-alive-ed-title/565925/26):
>
> I do not think porn stars are less worthy. I think that someone who has spent her “adult” life promoting the allusion of being a pre-teen who is highly sexualized only perpetuates and encourages pedophiles.

Far as I can tell from this Lightspeed University set-up, she wasn’t even being marketed as your standard ridiculously pig-tailed faux-young-teen, so much as a mostly ( entirely? ) softcore fantasy college coed. And really that is about as innocuous as internet porn gets. The accusation that she was involved in anything “pre-teen” seems a little bizarre, unless there is something I’m missing.

So in summary **FDH** fucked up, **Cisco** lost his cool but understandably so, no **FDH** doesn’t deserve a banning over this, but yes she did deserve to get called out.

ETA: Changed eleven to pre-teen. I thought Cisco had mentioned 8 years, but maybe not.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fried-dough-ho-needs-to-go/566066)._