# From the Memory Hole: Joey, Friends and Sexual Harrassment

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [November 2, 2017, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508 "2017-11-02T16:23:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 9:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/21 "2017-11-02T21:37:59Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> It [happened more recently](http://bigbangtheory.wikia.com/wiki/The_Benefactor_Factor) on _The Big Bang Theory_. Leonard sleeps with a rich widow for research donations.

> [@Bill\_Door](#):
>
> In all fairness, it was for a metric buttload of research donations.

Actually, he didn’t do it for that reason.

From your link:

> [@](#):
>
> On the date, Mrs. Latham expressed her apology for the night before as she made him feel the relationship had taken a Quid Pro Quo turn. She also reassures him that she will be donating the money no matter how this date goes, and after she claims that Leonard would have a night he would not forget with her, he kisses her and presumably, the desperate Leonard hops on the rare opportunity to have sexual intercourse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlsoNamedBort](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alsonamedbort/32/3213_2.png) [@AlsoNamedBort](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AlsoNamedBort)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/22 "2017-11-02T21:43:15Z")

</div>

> [@Don\_Draper](#):
>
> Are these episode scenarios funny? Or are they shockingly insensitive? Is is OK for these storylines to get played for laughs? Is it OK to depict Rachel sleeping with her would-be boss to get the job and then make jokes about it? When Phoebe is made to realize how she’s been taken advantage of, can the episode include a goofy slow-reaction shot by Phoebe complete with the sound of audience laughing hysterically? How about a comical reaction shot by Monica at the dress shop when the seamstress is ‘measuring her’? Would the network ever allow episode such as these to be filmed, let alone aired?

Situations on Friends that have been played for laughs:

1. Monica making sex noises when Phoebe was massaging her.
2. Rachel’s boyfriend revealing himself to Phoebe and groping her
3. Multiple men and women purposefully walking in on each other in the shower.
4. Rachel think her boss wanted sex from her to get a promotion. (That actually happened twice. Once with a female boss and once with a male boss).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/23 "2017-11-02T21:50:46Z")

</div>

> [@AlsoNamedBort](#):
>
> Situations on Friends that have been played for laughs:
> 
> 1. Monica making sex noises when Phoebe was massaging her.
> 2. Rachel’s boyfriend revealing himself to Phoebe and groping her
> 3. Multiple men and women purposefully walking in on each other in the shower.
> 4. Rachel think her boss wanted sex from her to get a promotion. (That actually happened twice. Once with a female boss and once with a male boss).

Monica having sex with a 17-year-old.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Don\_Draper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b2d939/32.png) [@Don\_Draper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Don_Draper)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/24 "2017-11-02T22:01:48Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](#):
>
> Monica having sex with a 17-year-old.

Actually, reverse _that_ and imagine how it plays – Chandler having sex with a 17-year old girl.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RivkahChaya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rivkahchaya/32/8919_2.png) [@RivkahChaya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RivkahChaya)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/25 "2017-11-02T22:10:55Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](#):
>
> Monica having sex with a 17-year-old.

The age of consent in NY is 17. Also, NY has laws that allow sex between two people when one of them is 16, if the age difference is less than something, although I’m not sure that Monica, at 24, was young enough. I think the difference is four years or less (yes, “less” is correct, because you can have a part of a year). I have not lived in NY for a long time, though, and IANAL.

That’s why Monica makes the joke that what they did made her a felon in “17 states,” (or something, I made the number up, but you get the idea)-- but NY was NOT one of the states. There are a few states with a consent age of 18, which means if a 19-year-old married a 17-year-old in, say, Indiana, where that is legal, don’t go honeymooning in California where the age of consent if 18.

I personally think it’s true that if the genders were reversed on much of the _Friends_ material, it wouldn’t have been funny then, and it’s less funny now. **But _Friends_ is 20 years old**. It holds up surprisingly well most of the time that it’s easy to forget how old it is, but it’s like watching _All in the Family_ in the 90s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/26 "2017-11-02T22:31:39Z")

</div>

> [@Don\_Draper](#):
>
> Actually, reverse _that_ and imagine how it plays – Chandler having sex with a 17-year old girl.

Ross dating a student at his university.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noel\_Prosequi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/b19c9b/32.png) [@Noel\_Prosequi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Noel_Prosequi)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 10:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/27 "2017-11-02T22:58:16Z")

</div>

Accepting that times have changed and Friends contains jokes that are now on the nose, it is still watchable and relatable.

But consider M_A_S\*H. Hugely beloved show back in the day. Now unwatchable with all the endless harrassment of the nurses. There is barely a conversation with them involving Hawkeye or Trapper that is not sexualised. Yes, that was no doubt a feature of the historical time in which the show is set, but to modern eyes, it is awful and cringeworthy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grrr](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/grrr/32/146_2.png) [@Grrr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grrr)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 11:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/28 "2017-11-02T23:09:38Z")

</div>

> [@Noel\_Prosequi](#):
>
> Accepting that times have changed and Friends contains jokes that are now on the nose, it is still watchable and relatable.
> 
> But consider M_A_S\*H. Hugely beloved show back in the day. Now unwatchable with all the endless harrassment of the nurses. There is barely a conversation with them involving Hawkeye or Trapper that is not sexualised. Yes, that was no doubt a feature of the historical time in which the show is set, but to modern eyes, it is awful and cringeworthy.

There’s also Barney on “How I Met Your Mother”.

That character is vile beyond the pale.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 11:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/29 "2017-11-02T23:35:47Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> Ross dating a student at his university.

Didn’t he have sex with her in the library?  
Anyway, people in 2040 will look back at us in embarrassment and shame so what’s the big deal?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/30 "2017-11-02T23:42:39Z")

</div>

> [@RivkahChaya](#):
>
> That’s why Monica makes the joke that what they did made her a felon in “17 states,” (or something, I made the number up, but you get the idea)-- but NY was NOT one of the states. There are a few states with a consent age of 18, which means if a 19-year-old married a 17-year-old in, say, Indiana, where that is legal, don’t go honeymooning in California where the age of consent if 18.

This wouldn’t be a problem - marriage is one of the things that renders “age of consent” moot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spice\_Weasel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spice_weasel/32/5435_2.png) [@Spice\_Weasel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spice_Weasel)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/31 "2017-11-02T23:49:32Z")

</div>

> [@Grrr](#):
>
> There’s also Barney on “How I Met Your Mother”.
> 
> That character is vile beyond the pale.

That whole show was filled with terrible people and Barney the Probably Rapist was actually the most likeable among them.

Sitcoms aren’t exactly known for their social sensitivity.

> [@Dr. Cube](#):
>
> I could agree with calling harassment. And I pointed out how it is wrong to make employment conditional upon sex, unless, you know, you’re a sex worker. But consensual sex is not assault. Even if one person is employed and the other isn’t. Even if one person has more money than the other. Even if one person offers money, gifts or favors in return for sex with the other. It might be illegal, it might be a jerk move, but the consent of the other party makes it not assault or rape.

But certainly, there are some power dynamics which make consent impossible. I haven’t seen the episode in question but sexual coercion is not consent. If someone is threatened with the loss of a job unless they perform sexual favors, there isn’t consent. I’m not sure (legally) how the threat of not being hired would stack up under current harassment and assault laws, but depending on the individual scenario, I could see it looking, and feeling, a lot like a sexual violation, and being equally traumatizing. Especially because the default response for the vast majority of people when they are sexually threatened is to freeze up and do nothing, regardless of what their rational brain might want them to do. It can’t reasonably be called a choice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alphaboi867](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alphaboi867/32/3898_2.png) [@alphaboi867](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alphaboi867)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2017, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/32 "2017-11-02T23:51:00Z")

</div>

> [@E-DUB](#):
>
> Not to mention the guy wanting to check his unit to see if it was intact.

Joey was auditioning for a role which involved frontal nudity playing a character who wouldn’t have been circumcised (Italian immigrant in the early 20th century); asking to see his genitals wasn’t sexual harassment, it was a legitimate part of the audition. He was told up front what the role involved, and the audition took place in front of a group of production people. It’s not like the director met him alone in his hotel room.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2017, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/33 "2017-11-03T02:09:41Z")

</div>

> [@mikecurtis](#):
>
> That was a typo on my part. . .SH not SA.  
> ANY quid pro quo involving sex in the workplace is harassment, regardless of consent.

Well, luckily Leonard didn’t work for the woman and they weren’t in the workplace. So your concern doesn’t apply.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikecurtis](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mikecurtis/32/3284_2.png) [@mikecurtis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mikecurtis)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2017, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/34 "2017-11-03T02:38:06Z")

</div>

Not my concerns . . the law.

> **[Sexual Harassment](https://www.eeoc.gov/sexual-harassment)**
>
> Sexual Harassment

> [@](#):
>
> It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, **requests for sexual favors** , and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature. . .  
> The harasser can be the victim’s supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, **or someone who is not an employee** of the employer, such as a client or customer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2017, 10:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/35 "2017-11-03T10:31:23Z")

</div>

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> Well, luckily Leonard didn’t work for the woman

No, he worked for the University the woman was a major donor to.

> [@](#):
>
> and they weren’t in the workplace

Actually, their encounter did start at a University fundraiser. It was made quite clear in the episode that the postdocs were effectively being pimped out by the University President.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2017, 11:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/36 "2017-11-03T11:53:54Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> It [happened more recently](http://bigbangtheory.wikia.com/wiki/The_Benefactor_Factor) on _The Big Bang Theory_. Leonard sleeps with a rich widow for research donations.

She specifically explained to Lenard that there was no “quid pro quo” here and she had already decided to donate the money.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2017, 12:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/37 "2017-11-03T12:26:26Z")

</div>

> [@mikecurtis](#):
>
> Not my concerns . . the law.
> 
> [Sexual Harassment | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission](https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sexual_harassment.cfm)

That’s nice and all. But she wasn’t a client or a customer.

If I go to Dunkin Donuts today and tell the cashier “If you have sex with me, I’ll buy every donut in the place” is that sexual harassment or solicitation?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aktep](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f0a364/32.png) [@aktep](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aktep)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2017, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/38 "2017-11-03T13:28:53Z")

</div>

In a university, major donors are absolutely clients/customers. In some cases, more important than the students, business-wise. Faculty and staff who are entertaining donors would absolutely feel an imbalance of power and could feel that their jobs are threatened for non-compliance. All it would take is for a major donor to imply that they will report back to the President that they did not enjoy their evening for the employee to feel fear of reprisal.

If we sent an employee to meet with a donor, and the donor made a suggestion of quid-pro-quo like this, and the employee reported it, we would be obligated to investigate, and could be subject to a Title IX complaint. The donor telling the employee later that it was not a quid-pro-quo request is not necessarily grounds for the university to drop the investigation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2017, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/39 "2017-11-03T13:40:00Z")

</div>

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> That’s nice and all. But she wasn’t a client or a customer.
> 
> If I go to Dunkin Donuts today and tell the cashier “If you have sex with me, I’ll buy every donut in the place” is that sexual harassment or solicitation?

Harassment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quimby](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/22d042/32.png) [@Quimby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quimby)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2017, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508/40 "2017-11-03T13:40:51Z")

</div>

> [@RivkahChaya](#):
>
> I personally think it’s true that if the genders were reversed on much of the _Friends_ material, it wouldn’t have been funny then, and it’s less funny now. **But _Friends_ is 20 years old**. It holds up surprisingly well most of the time that it’s easy to forget how old it is, but it’s like watching _All in the Family_ in the 90s.

The fact that it’s 20 years old is the point the discussion. What was a joke then is not so funny now (to many people). And this specific aspect was kind of forgotten.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/from-the-memory-hole-joey-friends-and-sexual-harrassment/800508.md?page=3)
