# Fuck Hillary Clinton!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [December 5, 2019, 8:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424 "2019-12-05T20:23:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2019, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/121 "2019-12-08T23:53:38Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> She and Bill (and possibly Chelsea) are still excellent fundraisers and organizers.

I have to agree that they are some of the best fundraisers & organizers the Republicans have. They’ve helped build the GOP into the nigh-unassailable powerhouse it is today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrickBat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ac91a4/32.png) [@BrickBat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrickBat)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/122 "2019-12-09T00:19:38Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> Here’s what the Beltway won’t accept: Maybe half the country is to Bernie Sander’s left on these kinds of issues. Bernie’s viability _staves off the guillotines._

Bingo. The plutocrats will still be absurdly wealthy under progressive policies, and if their positions of being de-facto powers-that-be are even marginally less solidified, it’s a small price to pay to prevent the unrest that’s sure to follow if income inequality is not addressed and the well being of the populace is not seen too.

“_Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable_”. John F Kennedy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 2:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/123 "2019-12-09T02:43:58Z")

</div>

1. She’s married.
2. No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 3:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/124 "2019-12-09T03:07:50Z")

</div>

I know I haven’t been on the SDMB so much lately, but I don’t remember **margin** that well. Is a table-pounding freakout as we saw in this thread in character?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/125 "2019-12-09T03:20:25Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> Clinton pledged to overturn Citizens United, but she did it while taking corporate money.

So . fucking . what.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> Clinton’s healthcare plan would do nothing to address the root of the flaw in our healthcare system: the for-profit nature of the insurance and pharmaceutical industries. Sanders would get rid of for-profit insurance; he’d also be willing to use the government’s constitutional right to seize patents when a medical company is charging outrageous prices for medicine (which means he’d never actually have to do it – the medical companies aren’t stupid; they’d much rather manufacture the drugs at a fair price than lose their patent). Clinton’s healthcare plan is a bandaid, just like the ACA.

He wasn’t going to get any of that shit done because Obama had proposed only doing a fraction of that and Obamacare was the best he could come up with – and he was rewarded with a batshit insane, obstructionist Republican majority of both chambers of congress in 2010 because of it. What do you NOT understand about this? All of the magical unicorn shit that Bernie bros wanted…they didn’t really seem to support in 2009 and 2010. They just got an erection because St Bernard talked about “revolution” in 2015. It’s easy as fuck to talk about revolution but it’s the hardest thing in the world to deliver it. Lazy-assed Bernie Bros are the reason that congress went to the GOP in 2010 and the reason why we can’t have good things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 4:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/126 "2019-12-09T04:28:04Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> So . fucking . what.
> 
> He wasn’t going to get any of that shit done because Obama had proposed only doing a fraction of that and Obamacare was the best he could come up with – and he was rewarded with a batshit insane, obstructionist Republican majority of both chambers of congress in 2010 because of it. What do you NOT understand about this? All of the magical unicorn shit that Bernie bros wanted…they didn’t really seem to support in 2009 and 2010. They just got an erection because St Bernard talked about “revolution” in 2015. It’s easy as fuck to talk about revolution but it’s the hardest thing in the world to deliver it. Lazy-assed Bernie Bros are the reason that congress went to the GOP in 2010 and the reason why we can’t have good things.

You really need to turn down the fury my friend. I voted for Hillary, and for every down ballot Democrat on the ticket. And I voted in the midterms. So I certainly did not get the GOP elected. The solution to gop obstructionism is to call them out at every turn and get them unelected, not capitulate, since they wont thank you anyways, just fuck you harder.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 7:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/127 "2019-12-09T07:55:26Z")

</div>

> [@Ale](#):
>
> She, and her campaign are the main reason Trump was elected. Over three years later and some people are still running around like headless chicken trying to find some other reason.

There were plenty of Democrats here on the Dope who were urging people to vote for Trump in the primaries, because “he couldn’t win”. So that’s one lesson learned, at least.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 9:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/128 "2019-12-09T09:50:07Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Is it Two-Minute Hate time again? That’s always fun for the whole family.

Asked and answered by this entire fucking thread. It’s fascinating to watch to what extent people will twist reality, rewrite history and ignore all evidence to the contrary to blame Hillary Clinton for absolutely everything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/129 "2019-12-09T14:03:35Z")

</div>

Personally, I think there’s more than enough blame to go around. It wasn’t all Hillary’s fault - it wasn’t even mostly her fault - but that doesn’t mean she didn’t screw up big time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/130 "2019-12-09T14:25:09Z")

</div>

> [@Alessan](#):
>
> Personally, I think there’s more than enough blame to go around. It wasn’t all Hillary’s fault - it wasn’t even mostly her fault - but that doesn’t mean she didn’t screw up big time.

Now see, that’s a reasonable assessment. Of course she made several material mistakes during the campaign that had a negative effect, but noting that there were other, more substantial factors involved is also key here. As opposed to, for example:

> [@Ale](#):
>
> She, and her campaign are the main reason Trump was elected. Over three years later and some people are still running around like headless chicken trying to find some other reason.

Anyone handwaving away the effect of the 25-year right-wing smear campaign against her, active Russian propaganda and hacking efforts, the effect of Comey’s last-minute announcement about the investigation and, last but certainly not least, the fact that a disturbing number of Americans admire Donald Trump for being an alpha asshole who gets away with the kind of shit they wish they could get away with, isn’t really interested in a realistic analysis of the last election and is just looking for an excuse to continue the aforementioned smear campaign.

Yes, she made some significant mistakes as a candidate and isn’t a terribly likeable person but Trump is also a terrible person who was literally in the middle of a fraud court case during the campaign so why is it that Clinton bears the full weight of her loss and his victory? The minor Comey bump aside, I’d argue that the other three factors I mentioned had a lot more to do with the election result than her failure to schedule a few more election stops in Michigan. And it’s not “running around like a headless chicken” to point that out.

But no, if it makes any of y’all happy to blame Hillary for everything, go right on lying about her. It’s not like we’re all not used to that sort of thing already.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 2:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/131 "2019-12-09T14:40:00Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> … the effect of Comey’s last-minute announcement about the investigation …

That was very significant, and she handled it very badly.

How does one handle being blindsided? Well, given the nature of modern election cycles, it should be expected. The candidate, especially at that level, needs to have a team of strategists specifically organized to deal with the October Surprize. Anyone caught off guard like that does not deserve the office they are running for.

And that was her biggest problem. She _deserved_ to be in the Oval Office, and it was going to be handed to her on a plate. It was hers, and all she had to do was smile and make a few witty comments.

That was why she pissed so many people off. We owed it to her. Arrogant twit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/132 "2019-12-09T15:04:16Z")

</div>

> [@eschereal](#):
>
> That was very significant, and she handled it very badly.
> 
> How does one handle being blindsided? Well, given the nature of modern election cycles, it should be expected. The candidate, especially at that level, needs to have a team of strategists specifically organized to deal with the October Surprize. Anyone caught off guard like that does not deserve the office they are running for.
> 
> And that was her biggest problem. She _deserved_ to be in the Oval Office, and it was going to be handed to her on a plate. It was hers, and all she had to do was smile and make a few witty comments.
> 
> That was why she pissed so many people off. We owed it to her. Arrogant twit.

You’re doing it again. Why assume that “it was going to be handed to her on a plate”? That was just the conventional wisdom - the same conventional wisdom that assumed that most Americans weren’t stupid enough to vote for an openly-narcissistic conman, the same conventional wisdom that was staggeringly wrong. The default was never “It’s Clinton’s election to lose” - that view also ignored the various forces arrayed against her. Yes, she still could have won if she’d run a better campaign, but that’s just claiming that the last straw to break the camel’s back did so because it was the heaviest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 4:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/133 "2019-12-09T16:15:44Z")

</div>

As wife of a former president, you can’t deny that she benefited from a certain amount of nepotism. Not as much as, say, George W. Bush, but in the same wheelhouse. Is it wrong to assume that it involved a certain amount of entitlement?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 4:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/134 "2019-12-09T16:20:52Z")

</div>

> [@Alessan](#):
>
> Is it wrong to assume that it involved a certain amount of entitlement?

Maybe the first time she ran in 2008 and lost the nomination to Obama.

Even then, I’d argue against it.

But in 2016? Unlikely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 6:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/135 "2019-12-09T18:15:49Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> You really need to turn down the fury my friend. I voted for Hillary, and for every down ballot Democrat on the ticket. And I voted in the midterms. So I certainly did not get the GOP elected. The solution to gop obstructionism is to call them out at every turn and get them unelected, not capitulate, since they wont thank you anyways, just fuck you harder.

This is the unvarnished truth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 6:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/136 "2019-12-09T18:40:41Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Why assume that “it was going to be handed to her on a plate”?

Because that was how she was fucking acting. We _owed_ to her. She believed that it was her turn and she did not have to bust her ass to get there, like everyone else in history. I mean, look how the Party capitulated and handed her the nomination. The rest of the country was supposed to see the oil on her forehead and accept her. All she had to do was step over a troublesome dirt clod.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/137 "2019-12-09T22:41:11Z")

</div>

> [@eschereal](#):
>
> Michigan: 16 EVs (margin: 10,704 votes)  
> Pennsylvania: 20 EVs (margin: 44,292 votes)  
> Wisconsin: 10 EVs (margin: 22,748 votes)
> 
> Those are the only states that she lost by a narrow margin (of less than 1%). Put those 46 EVs in her column (taking them away from AgentOrange) and she wins the EC. Basically, you would have to turn about 100K votes in her favor across those states, to show a reasonable margin of victory in each of them, which would be around 0.07% of the overall total.
> 
> So, yeah, **three**.

Sure, if you get to define handful as less than 1%. I think she lost about

If you take that 5 million vote popular vote “victory” in California and spread it out over some of the other states, she would have had a landslide victory. So (A) really bad politician and (B) the popular vote “victory” powered mostly be turnout in California) is meaningless.

With a total of 136 million votes cast, if she could have moved the needle on 1% or 1.36 million of those votes in the right states, she would have won at least 126 more electoral votes. But at least she won California by 5 million votes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 10:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/138 "2019-12-09T22:42:48Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> So you have no problem with the vast majority of states being totally ignored? Can you explain your argument again? That seems to directly refute your prior argument.
> 
> Right now, with the EC, candidates only visit swing states. Tens of millions of voters are ignored, and their votes basically don’t matter. I propose an imperfect scheme in which candidates will still spend most of their time visiting a limited number of places (just like now!), but every voter’s influence will be _exactly the same_ as every other voter. A voter in CA will have the exact same chance to influence the vote as a voter in IA, NH, TX, or FL. Why, exactly, is the former scheme superior, in your opinion?

Because it keeps campaigns affordable, it focuses on the swing voters, it doesn’t ignore rural voters, and discounts the opinions of the most partisan states.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 10:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/139 "2019-12-09T22:50:56Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Wow, you really don’t understand how the EC works, do you? If Hillary had won PA, WI, and MI, she would have won the election.

That is the dumbest comment I have seen from you in a long fucking time. Do you really think I don’t understand how the Electoral College works?

The point is that Obama won by a shit ton of electoral votes and Hillary didn’t just lose ground, she lost by a healthy margin of electoral votes. And her popular vote tally is meaningless.

Trump could just as credibly say that if he were going for the popular vote, he would have won that bigly. And you couldn’t prove otherwise. But Hillary could not really say that she would beat Trump in an electoral vote election because she didn’t.

This is the equivalent of the Panthers claiming they are the ACTUAL winners of the superbowl in 2016 because they got 50% more yards than the Broncos and their 24-10 loss reflects a problem with the rules of how football games are determined.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2019, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424/140 "2019-12-09T23:03:28Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> That is the dumbest comment I have seen from you in a long fucking time. Do you really think I don’t understand how the Electoral College works?
> 
> The point is that Obama won by a shit ton of electoral votes and Hillary didn’t just lose ground, she lost by a healthy margin of electoral votes. And her popular vote tally is meaningless.
> 
> Trump could just as credibly say that if he were going for the popular vote, he would have won that bigly. And you couldn’t prove otherwise. But Hillary could not really say that she would beat Trump in an electoral vote election because she didn’t.
> 
> This is the equivalent of the Panthers claiming they are the ACTUAL winners of the superbowl in 2016 because they got 50% more yards than the Broncos and their 24-10 loss reflects a problem with the rules of how football games are determined.

This doesn’t refute anything I said. You said “it wasn’t three states”, when that is a factually false statement – Hillary lost the election by just 3 states.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424.md?page=6)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-hillary-clinton/844424.md?page=8)
