# Fuck You, Voters

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 3, 2010, 2:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326 "2010-11-03T14:09:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 3:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/201 "2010-11-04T15:53:32Z")

</div>

> [@Barkis\_is\_Willin](#):
>
> Could you define “vastly more efficient?” I’ve only heard anecdotes about the wait times in Canada, for example.

Vastly more efficient means it does more for the same resources.

Here it is in pictures to help you understand: [All Credit Types Are Welcome | LendingStore.com](http://www.visualeconomics.com/healthcare-costs-around-the-world_2010-03-01/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![leftfield6](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leftfield6/32/18780_2.png) [@leftfield6](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/leftfield6)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/202 "2010-11-04T16:10:44Z")

</div>

> [@Barkis\_is\_Willin](#):
>
> Could you define “vastly more efficient?” I’ve only heard anecdotes about the wait times in Canada, for example.

\*The U.S. already rations care. Rationing in U.S. health care is based on income: if you can afford care, you get it; if you can’t, you don’t. A recent study by the prestigious Institute of Medicine found that 18,000 Americans die every year because they don’t have health insurance. Many more skip treatments that their insurance company refuses to cover. That’s rationing. Other countries do not ration in this way.

If there is this much rationing, why don’t we hear about it? And if other countries ration less, why do we hear about them? The answer is that their systems are publicly accountable, and ours is not. Problems with their health care systems are aired in public; ours are not. For example, in Canada, when waits for care emerged in the 1990s, Parliament hotly debated the causes and solutions. Most provinces have also established formal reporting systems on waiting lists, with wait times for each hospital posted on the Internet. This public attention has led to recent falls in waits there.

In U.S. health care, no one is ultimately accountable for how the system works. No one takes full responsibility. Rationing in our system is carried out covertly through financial pressure, forcing millions of individuals to forgo care or to be shunted away by caregivers from services they can’t pay for.

The rationing that takes place in U.S. health care is unnecessary. A number of studies (notably a General Accounting Office report in 1991 and a Congressional Budget Office report in 1993) show that there is more than enough money in our health care system to serve everyone if it were spent wisely. Administrative costs are at 31% of U.S. health spending, far higher than in other countries’ systems. These inflated costs are due to our failure to have a publicly financed, universal health care system. We spend about twice as much per person as Canada or most European nations, and still deny health care to many in need. A national health program could save enough on administration to assure access to care for all Americans, without rationing.\*  
Sorry for the minor thread-jack, but Barkis needed some facts.😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wile\_E](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c37758/32.png) [@Wile\_E](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wile_E)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/203 "2010-11-04T16:26:15Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> When it comes to HC, there is nothing for the federal government to “fix.” The federal government just needs to stay out of HC.

Not true. The main problem with healthcare is insurance companies. The only way to do anything about them is through governmental regulations.

I have healthcare through my work, they pay half, but I still can’t afford routine Heathcare because every year they (the insurance company) drop our old policy and make us choose a new one. Our choices are the same coverage for more money monthly or less coverage and higher deductibles for the same thing we were paying or slightly less. Basically our deductibles are now so high that the insurance is mostly just in case we get hit with a catastrophic illness but we’ll still go broke paying our deductibles.

The insurance company gets away with pulling this crap and they’ve been doing it every year for the past several years. When we try to switch providers we’ll get a lower quote then we have to fill out some questionnaires and then they tell us they can’t offer us that lower price because someone has some existing issue.

So yes, healthcare needs to be fixed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/204 "2010-11-04T16:27:19Z")

</div>

> [@Lobohan](#):
>
> Government run healthcare is vastly more efficient than our system. This is a fact. If you choose not to believe facts because they conflict with your ideology, you’re simply not an honest person.

Even if government-run healthcare is more efficient, I would still be against it.

I do not believe the federal government should have anything to do with healthcare. We need to continue to scale back its involvement until it’s zero.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/205 "2010-11-04T16:34:37Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> Even if government-run healthcare is more efficient, I would still be against it.
> 
> I do not believe the federal government should have anything to do with healthcare. We need to continue to scale back its involvement until it’s zero.

There you have it, folks. It doesn’t matter if it’s better, if it’s cheaper, if it saves lives, or if the country and world would be a vastly better and safer place for us, our children, and their children.

“It’s the _gummint_, dagnabbit, so I’s gonna \*oppose \*it!”

It must really suck thinking you’re so free, and being trapped in such a tiny prison of your own construction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/206 "2010-11-04T16:36:55Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> Even if government-run healthcare is more efficient, I would still be against it.
> 
> I do not believe the federal government should have anything to do with healthcare. We need to continue to scale back its involvement until it’s zero.

Well you see, that’s where your ideology blinds you. I don’t care that you’ve decided on an irrational and backwards view of the universe. What matters is that the most people lead the best lives.

People get sick through no fault of their own. In a “free market” system, sick people won’t be able to get health insurance. This is a fact. This is actually what happens under our old system. Many people are simply priced out of the market. If you have a solid middle class job it’s perfectly possible to not be able to afford insurance. I’m a self-employed asthmatic for instance. I assure you, insurance for me isn’t cheap. Luckily, I have a policy through my wife.

You are advocating a system that will both cost more and lead to more suffering. You’re willing to pay extra money to hurt more people, just so your ideology is served.

That you have such a devotion to a stupid ideology makes you evil. It doesn’t make you _right_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davidm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidm/32/225_2.png) [@davidm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/davidm)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/207 "2010-11-04T16:36:55Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> Even if government-run healthcare is more efficient, I would still be against it.
> 
> I do not believe the federal government should have anything to do with healthcare. We need to continue to scale back its involvement until it’s zero.

Suppose, for the sake of argument, that scaling it back in that manner would lead to poor health care and unnecessary death for large numbers of Americans? Would you still be for scaling it back? If so, why?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosstone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/22d042/32.png) [@Bosstone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosstone)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/208 "2010-11-04T16:43:01Z")

</div>

It continually amazes me that conservatives are not in favor of universal healthcare. It takes the weight of company-provided insurance off the backs of small businesses while also guaranteeing that the workforce is healthier and happier and thus more productive. It provides the same level of care for less money or more care for the same amount of money.

Healthcare is, in effect, infrastructure. It’s no different from the road and highway system. It provides the means for private companies to go about their business with ease without needing to be concerned about clearing their own path through the brambles and brush. It seems like one of the basic things a government should concern itself with.

But then, it ain’t got shit to do with guns and shooting people different from you, so fuck it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davidm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidm/32/225_2.png) [@davidm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/davidm)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/209 "2010-11-04T16:48:01Z")

</div>

> [@Bosstone](#):
>
> It continually amazes me that conservatives are not in favor of universal healthcare. It takes the weight of company-provided insurance off the backs of small businesses while also guaranteeing that the workforce is healthier and happier and thus more productive. It provides the same level of care for less money or more care for the same amount of money.
> 
> Healthcare is, in effect, infrastructure. It’s no different from the road and highway system. It provides the means for private companies to go about their business with ease without needing to be concerned about clearing their own path through the brambles and brush. It seems like one of the basic things a government should concern itself with.
> 
> But then, it ain’t got shit to do with guns and shooting people different from you, so fuck it.

Nothing amazing about it. Conservative rhetoric is driven by big business. Private health insurance is one of the biggest. Therefore conservative rhetoric supports private health insurance. Simple.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/210 "2010-11-04T16:48:16Z")

</div>

> [@Bosstone](#):
>
> It continually amazes me that conservatives are not in favor of universal healthcare. It takes the weight of company-provided insurance off the backs of small businesses while also guaranteeing that the workforce is healthier and happier and thus more productive. It provides the same level of care for less money or more care for the same amount of money.
> 
> Healthcare is, in effect, infrastructure. It’s no different from the road and highway system. It provides the means for private companies to go about their business with ease without needing to be concerned about clearing their own path through the brambles and brush. It seems like one of the basic things a government should concern itself with.
> 
> But then, it ain’t got shit to do with guns and shooting people different from you, so fuck it.

The problem is that conservatives in America are so uninformed they don’t understand even basic issues. I’ll bet that the vast majority of people against “Obamacare” think it will mean waiting in line for the DMV. Take a number and go to a doctor window. They don’t understand that the actual providers will still be the same, just the insurance side is changed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosstone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/22d042/32.png) [@Bosstone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosstone)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/211 "2010-11-04T16:49:16Z")

</div>

> [@davidm](#):
>
> Nothing amazing about it. Conservative rhetoric is driven by big business. Private health insurance is one of the biggest. Therefore conservative rhetoric supports private health insurance. Simple.

True. What ensaddens me is so many individuals who claim to be sensible fiscal conservatives looking out for SMBs oppose it for the Big Business reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davidm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidm/32/225_2.png) [@davidm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/davidm)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/212 "2010-11-04T17:49:18Z")

</div>

I’m not familiar with the term “SMB”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![descamisado](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e480ec/32.png) [@descamisado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/descamisado)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/213 "2010-11-04T17:55:30Z")

</div>

**S** mall and **M** edium **B** usiness[es].

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosstone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/22d042/32.png) [@Bosstone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosstone)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 5:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/214 "2010-11-04T17:57:08Z")

</div>

Sorry, it gets used a lot in the work I do, so I used it without thinking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davidm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidm/32/225_2.png) [@davidm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/davidm)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/215 "2010-11-04T18:07:17Z")

</div>

No problem. Your statement makes perfect sense now. Why do they claim to be trying to protect small businesses while constantly taking positions that favor large businesses over small?

The answer, of course, is that it’s really large businesses that they favor. However, that wouldn’t go over well politically, so they claim to favor small businesses and then spin LB friendly policies as favoring SMBs (even when they really don’t).

The other thing they do is spin things that favor LBs as favoring workers. Of course quite often those workers are in China and “favor” means “enslave”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shot\_From\_Guns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ccd318/32.png) [@Shot\_From\_Guns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shot_From_Guns)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/216 "2010-11-04T18:18:25Z")

</div>

> [@Quasimodem](#):
>
> If I know my friend **SFG** , she’s busy composing her rebuttal/riposte, but I am VERY interested in the question about smoking weed and it being legal to do so.
> 
> I have a very important reason for asking her this as I have a niece who may need it, and we live in Georgia.

It wasn’t an issue in my state, but for the record, I’m in favor of legalization and/or decriminalization of pretty much everything. Possibly just plain everything.

> [@Quasimodem](#):
>
> _backs out slowly_

I’ll distract 'em while you make a break for the car! 😃

> [@marochko](#):
>
> must… Not… Fap!

That’ll be $50.

> [@Klaatu](#):
>
> Bulwer-Lytton winner!

Too bad it was three sentences, not one. Also: awesome.

> [@Cyberhwk](#):
>
> Oh yeah, I guess I saw a sign that said, “I-1100, too extreme for Washington” as if it’s completely radical to let adults buy alcohol at the grocery store.

Maybe they meant to X-TREEEEEM\*!!!\*

> [@anya\_marie](#):
>
> Fuck anyone who doesn’t bother to vote.

Agreed.

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> The federal government just needs to stay out of HC.

$5 says he’s posting this from his Medicare-paid Rascal.

> [@davidm](#):
>
> Conservative rhetoric is driven by big business. Private health insurance is one of the biggest. Therefore conservative rhetoric supports private health insurance. Simple.

And really, the insurance companies are the only ones who benefit from the current model. It’s a massive burden for everyone else, and it’s hurting the ability of companies that employ Americans to be competitive globally.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/217 "2010-11-04T18:22:31Z")

</div>

> [@VinylTurnip](#):
>
> There you have it, folks. It doesn’t matter if it’s better, if it’s cheaper, if it saves lives, or if the country and world would be a vastly better and safer place for us, our children, and their children.
> 
> “It’s the _gummint_, dagnabbit, so I’s gonna \*oppose \*it!”
> 
> It must really suck thinking you’re so free, and being trapped in such a tiny prison of your own construction.

I’m not necessarily against government involvement in healthcare. But according to the 10th Amendment, it must be done at the state level, \*not \*the federal level.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/218 "2010-11-04T18:26:50Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> I’m not necessarily against government involvement in healthcare. But according to the 10th Amendment, it must be done at the state level, \*not \*the federal level.

According to _your reading_ of the tenth amendment. You will note that plenty of people who know more than you do disagree with that assessment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Tooth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c67d28/32.png) [@The\_Tooth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Tooth)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/219 "2010-11-04T18:27:29Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> Even if government-run healthcare is more efficient, I would still be against it.
> 
> I do not believe the federal government should have anything to do with healthcare. We need to continue to scale back its involvement until it’s zero.

Why? What would this accomplish? A warm fuzzy for you? Why should anyone else care if you’re satisfied ideologically? I can see why you might, but why should anyone else? When you say “we”, to whom do you refer? You and the mouse in your pocket?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SenorBeef](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senorbeef/32/2220_2.png) [@SenorBeef](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SenorBeef)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326/220 "2010-11-04T18:47:08Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> I’m not necessarily against government involvement in healthcare. But according to the 10th Amendment, it must be done at the state level, \*not \*the federal level.

If it were conclusively proven that the most efficient and effective model were a federal one, would you support an amendment to the constitution granting the federal government that power?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/fuck-you-voters/559326.md?page=12)
