Garland should just sit down and judge?

[Bone]

@drad_dog

Like sitting on a chamber pot and not voting?

Constituents ‘probably’ wanted that? How’s that logic go?

There are way more ways of not doing their job. They’re going to explore every one apparently.

Oh, I must have left off the quote. Silly me.

@YogSothoth

Democrats know that if you don’t control the presidency, you can’t simply block a nominee because he’s not liberal. We do our jobs unlike the extremist GOP. And even if we don’t like him, we’ll give him a fair hearing, again unlike the extremist GOP.

@YogSothoth

You’re not getting it. Their absence is the method by which they are fulfilling their legislative responsibilities. They are denying the Republicans the ability to pass an anti-union bill, which is probably what their constituents want them to do when they were elected. There are more ways of legislating than sitting in a chamber and voting.

@Bone

You’re not getting it. The absence of a hearing on Garland is the method by which they are fulfilling their legislative responsibilities. They are denying Obama the ability to confirm a left leaning SCOTUS justice, which is probably what their constituents want them to do when they were elected. There are more ways of doing their job than sitting in a chamber and voting.

Parody, no?