# Gay activists flip off Reagan's picture

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 23, 2012, 6:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042 "2012-06-23T06:32:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Honesty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f04885/32.png) [@Honesty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Honesty)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/61 "2012-06-23T20:27:42Z")

</div>

> [@Farmer\_Jane](#):
>
> Millions in a decade? [Derh…](http://www.avert.org/usa-statistics.htm)
> 
> Don’t inflate numbers to ‘make a point’.

Your statistic shows who has died of HIV. What about the[1.2 million people infected with the virus](http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/index.htm)?

- Honesty

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/62 "2012-06-23T20:36:57Z")

</div>

> [@mister\_nyx](#):
>
> Nah. People who are already anti-gay will shout out how outrageous this is and screech about how very, very offended they are, but exactly zero people are going to actually change the way they vote because of something this insignificant. And a week from now only the screeching anti-gay lunatics will even remember it anyway.

Believe what you feel you must. But I maintain that these images will be popping up in advertisements in future ballot initiatives regarding SSM and the like. Like for most things these day, it’s about winning over the middle. And this will not gain them one vote there, but will lose them some.

Guess we’ll just have to wait and see who is right.

Hmmm. Is there a way to bet on this on that site where you can place money on just about anything? Anyone?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 8:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/63 "2012-06-23T20:42:36Z")

</div>

> [@mister\_nyx](#):
>
> Nah. People who are already anti-gay will shout out how outrageous this is and screech about how very, very offended they are, but exactly zero people are going to actually change the way they vote because of something this insignificant.

There are lots of people who are pro-gay in this thread pointing out how offended they are. Not that it’s going to change any of our votes, but “well, it didn’t lose us any votes” is not a very good measure of success as an activist.

[QUOTE=Honesty]  
Your statistic shows who has died of HIV. What about the 1.2 million people infected with the virus?

- Honesty  
[/QUOTE]

It’s horrible. It still doesn’t support your claim that “millions of Americans were dying of HIV” during Reagan’s term.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/64 "2012-06-23T20:43:58Z")

</div>

> [@mhendo](#):
>
> His turnaround gives me some hope that even an asshole like you might one day see the light, but i won’t hold my breath.

And perhaps one day people like you will realize that people can disagree with them on one aspect of an issue they feel strongly about and not be assholes. But due to my interaction with you an many others on these boards, I am less than optimistic.

So hold your breath or not, not matter to me. On second thought, I’d prefer you breathe. I can see that those brain cells need all the help they can get.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mister\_nyx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df705f/32.png) [@mister\_nyx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mister_nyx)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 8:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/65 "2012-06-23T20:52:13Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> Hmmm. Is there a way to bet on this on that site where you can place money on just about anything? Anyone?

You want to place bets on some future outcome that would never be demonstrable anyway? Whatever the election result, how would it be determined that this had made any difference?

Now I know for certain not to take anything you say seriously in the future.

[QUOTE=Really Not All That Bright]  
There are lots of people who are pro-gay in this thread pointing out how offended they are. Not that it’s going to change any of our votes, but “well, it didn’t lose us any votes” is not a very good measure of success as an activist.  
[/QUOTE]

But that was the claim I was responding to – that it would lose votes. If you don’t think that’s a useful thing to discuss, why are you telling me rather than the person who made the claim?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/66 "2012-06-23T21:00:31Z")

</div>

A friend and role model of mine was also at that reception. I’ve watched her amazing [Campaign for Southern Equality](http://www.southernequality.org/) take root in our state and do some amazing activism. She recognizes that the current batch of people who believe in gay rights is insufficient: to win this fight, we’ve got to convert some current homophobes.

I cannot possibly imagine she’s happy about these jackasses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/67 "2012-06-23T21:52:16Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> And perhaps one day people like you will realize that people can disagree with them on one aspect of an issue they feel strongly about and not be assholes.

I’ve disagreed with plenty of people about plenty of things without believing that they are assholes. I believe in a progressive taxation system, but don’t believe that you need to be an asshole to disagree with me. I believe in the right to on-demand abortion, but don’t believe that you need to be an asshole to disagree with that either. People can arrive at very different conclusions than me on a variety of issues, and while i might never agree with them, i can understand and at some level respect the worldview that shapes their position.

You can argue against progressive taxation on the libertarian notion of rights, or on a more utilitarian notion of the best way to distribute wealth and opportunity in society. You can argue against abortion on the idea that the fetus is a living creature that deserves some rights of its own, or that it is preferable to bring the baby into the world and have someone else look after it. As i said, i would disagree with those positions, but they have, at least, some rational basis.

But on the gay marriage issue, in all my reading and all my discussions on the subject, i can’t come to any conclusion that those who oppose it are anything but irrational bigots. There is no argument against gay marriage that boils down to anything more than one or more of: “God says we shouldn’t do it”; “It’s how we’ve always done it”; or “If gays marry, it devalues straight marriage.” The first two of those are not a reasonable basis for public policy, and the last is nothing but a self-serving delusion propagated by people who prefer to blame the queers for the decline of the marital bond.

Those opposed to gay marriage are effectively saying, “We don’t want you to have this because we don’t like you. We know it won’t actually hurt us in any way, but we will still deny you this because we can.” Luckily, the underlined bit of that sentence is becoming less reflective of reality all the time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/68 "2012-06-23T21:57:08Z")

</div>

> [@mister\_nyx](#):
>
> You want to place bets on some future outcome that would never be demonstrable anyway? Whatever the election result, how would it be determined that this had made any difference?
> 
> Now I know for certain not to take anything you say seriously in the future.

:rolleyes: While we may not be able to ascribe a particular portion of a particular outcome to the pictures being used, my main point was that the pictures will be used, by those opposing gay rights. And _that_ it’s really easy thing to determine, isn’t it? You look at the advertising for issues like SSM that will be on ballots in the near future and see if the images are used or not.

Do you think they won’t be used? Do you think they might be used by the Pro SSM crowd?

Would you like to wager on if they are used? And by whom?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/69 "2012-06-23T21:59:14Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> You can judge if I’m right after you see these pictures when gay issues come on the ballots in various states in the future. My money say they’ll be used by those who are against the very policies that those two asshole advocate. If you’re right, they’ll be used but the gay activists, too.
> 
> Yeah, right.

My money is that this won’t be more than a blip on the radar, forgotten in weeks. The only people who will remember it are people who hate gays anyway and will never vote to give them their rights. Most decent people will recognize that two people acting like jackasses one time is no reason to deny millions of people their human rights.

Also, no one familiar with your posts believes that you have gay people’s best interest at heart, so please stop concern-trolling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mister\_nyx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df705f/32.png) [@mister\_nyx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mister_nyx)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/70 "2012-06-23T22:03:19Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> Do you think they won’t be used?

Eh. They probably will. The anti-marriage-equality crowd is composed of people stupid enough to do lots of dumb things. I got an email from the National Organization for Marriage the other week about a protest against Starbucks’s support for marriage equality – in which the instruction is to buy Starbucks coffee and then dump it out.

I mean, hell, by the standards of these organizations, someone like you who wants to take bets on an outcome that will never even be determinate is smart enough to be in a leadership position. But it still won’t end up changing a single vote in whatever states have something on the ballot (Minnesota, at least, and I think Washington).

> [@](#):
>
> Would you like to wager on if they are used? And by whom?

Why would I bet on something so obviously, stupidly irrelevant? There are a million of these little fly-by-night advocacy groups anyway. Hell, if you were concerned you were losing the bet you could probably start one yourself since half of these weird little right wing groups appear to be one or two people.

I get that you’re dumb enough to bet on things like that but don’t assume everyone you meet is as dumb as you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/71 "2012-06-23T22:06:55Z")

</div>

> [@mhendo](#):
>
> I’ve disagreed with plenty of people about plenty of things without believing that they are assholes. I believe in a progressive taxation system, but don’t believe that you need to be an asshole to disagree with me. I believe in the right to on-demand abortion, but don’t believe that you need to be an asshole to disagree with that either. People can arrive at very different conclusions than me on a variety of issues, and while i might never agree with them, i can understand and at some level respect the worldview that shapes their position.
> 
> You can argue against progressive taxation on the libertarian notion of rights, or on a more utilitarian notion of the best way to distribute wealth and opportunity in society. You can argue against abortion on the idea that the fetus is a living creature that deserves some rights of its own, or that it is preferable to bring the baby into the world and have someone else look after it. As i said, i would disagree with those positions, but they have, at least, some rational basis.
> 
> But on the gay marriage issue, in all my reading and all my discussions on the subject, i can’t come to any conclusion that those who oppose it are anything but irrational bigots. There is no argument against gay marriage that boils down to anything more than one or more of: “God says we shouldn’t do it”; “It’s how we’ve always done it”; or “If gays marry, it devalues straight marriage.” The first two of those are not a reasonable basis for public policy, and the last is nothing but a self-serving delusion propagated by people who prefer to blame the queers for the decline of the marital bond.
> 
> Those opposed to gay marriage are effectively saying, “We don’t want you to have this because we don’t like you. We know it won’t actually hurt us in any way, but we will still deny you this because we can.” Luckily, the underlined bit of that sentence is becoming less reflective of reality all the time.

Oh, I see. You’re not reading enough translates to you feeling justified in considering those you disagree with assholes. My advice, get your nose out of The Dope and read some people who hold positions you don’t agree with. You’ve got a search engine, use it. And no, I’m not going to turn this into a SSM thread. If you care one iota what my views actually are, there’s another search engine built into The Dope. It too is free. Knock yourself out.

Not that I mind people who think the way you do thinking me an asshole. Kinda makes me feel I’m on the right track actually. So, thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/72 "2012-06-23T22:12:02Z")

</div>

> [@Larry\_Borgia](#):
>
> My money is that this won’t be more than a blip on the radar, forgotten in weeks. The only people who will remember it are people who hate gays anyway and will never vote to give them their rights. Most decent people will recognize that two people acting like jackasses one time is no reason to deny millions of people their human rights.
> 
> Also, no one familiar with your posts believes that you have gay people’s best interest at heart, so please stop concern-trolling.

Obviously, you are not familiar with my posts then. But don’t let that stop you from spout nonsense.

As far as who will be using these…the point is that, yes, the photos will be used by those who do not agree with SSM and those who hate gays. But the destructive part is that they will use them to sway the same people that the pro-SSM crowd will be trying to sway with their feel-good imagery of SS couples. If you think that the images we’re talking about aren’t powerful ones, you’re kidding yourself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/73 "2012-06-23T22:13:45Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> If you care one iota what my views actually are, there’s another search engine built into The Dope. It too is free. Knock yourself out.

I know what they are. I was involved in a lot of the SSM debates around here before and after Prop 8 was passed, and i’ve seen you lay out your position. It fits perfectly into the model i outlined in my previous post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/74 "2012-06-23T22:15:54Z")

</div>

> [@mhendo](#):
>
> But on the gay marriage issue, in all my reading and all my discussions on the subject, i can’t come to any conclusion that those who oppose it are anything but irrational bigots. There is no argument against gay marriage that boils down to anything more than one or more of: “God says we shouldn’t do it”; “It’s how we’ve always done it”; or “If gays marry, it devalues straight marriage.” The first two of those are not a reasonable basis for public policy, and the last is nothing but a self-serving delusion propagated by people who prefer to blame the queers for the decline of the marital bond.
> 
> Those opposed to gay marriage are effectively saying, “We don’t want you to have this because we don’t like you. We know it won’t actually hurt us in any way, but we will still deny you this because we can.” Luckily, the underlined bit of that sentence is becoming less reflective of reality all the time.

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> Oh, I see. You’re not reading enough translates to you feeling justified in considering those you disagree with assholes.

No, that’s a perfectly fair description of how one sided the debate over SSM is. The anti-SSM people have been challenged again and again to provide some other rational reason to oppose it, including here on the SDMB and failed over and over.

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> If you care one iota what my views actually are, there’s another search engine built into The Dope.

You are a wide ranging bigot. Whenever there’s a thread on a civil rights issue and I see you post, I know before reading what you say that you’ll almost certainly take the bigoted side.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/75 "2012-06-23T22:16:39Z")

</div>

> [@mister\_nyx](#):
>
> Eh. They probably will. The anti-marriage-equality crowd is composed of people stupid enough to do lots of dumb things. I got an email from the National Organization for Marriage the other week about a protest against Starbucks’s support for marriage equality – in which the instruction is to buy Starbucks coffee and then dump it out.
> 
> I mean, hell, by the standards of these organizations, someone like you who wants to take bets on an outcome that will never even be determinate is smart enough to be in a leadership position. But it still won’t end up changing a single vote in whatever states have something on the ballot (Minnesota, at least, and I think Washington).  
> Why would I bet on something so obviously, stupidly irrelevant? There are a million of these little fly-by-night advocacy groups anyway. Hell, if you were concerned you were losing the bet you could probably start one yourself since half of these weird little right wing groups appear to be one or two people.
> 
> I get that you’re dumb enough to bet on things like that but don’t assume everyone you meet is as dumb as you.

Translation: Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, I guess you’re right, they will be used and by the people who you claimed would use them, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So there!

So, we agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/76 "2012-06-23T22:18:18Z")

</div>

> [@mhendo](#):
>
> I know what they are. I was involved in a lot of the SSM debates around here before and after Prop 8 was passed, and i’ve seen you lay out your position. It fits perfectly into the model i outlined in my previous post.

Like I said, use the Search feature. Fight your own ignorance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mister\_nyx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df705f/32.png) [@mister\_nyx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mister_nyx)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/77 "2012-06-23T22:20:28Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> Translation: Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, I guess you’re right, they will be used and by the people who you claimed would use them, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So there!
> 
> So, we agree.

I said it won’t change any votes, you asked if I wanted to make a bet, I pointed out how stupid that was, and you acted like a six-year-old.

Yep. You’re living down to expectations all right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/78 "2012-06-23T22:25:28Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> No, that’s a perfectly fair description of how one sided the debate over SSM is. The anti-SSM people have been challenged again and again to provide some other rational reason to oppose it, including here on the SDMB and failed over and over.

Well, I’m certainly not surprised that you have confusion when it comes to the word “rational”. You foaming at the mouth. Manson-crazy ball of hate and stupidity.

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> You are a wide ranging bigot. Whenever there’s a thread on a civil rights issue and I see you post, I know before reading what you say that you’ll almost certainly take the bigoted side.

:rolleyes: You know, without even know what you’re referring to (you know, kindle like yourself) as a general rule, if I take the position opposite you, I’m comfortable that I’m on the right side of the debate. The sane side. You get my drift, Mr. Kill All American Military?

I sincerely hope you post with one hand handcuffed to a hospital bed inside a secure sanitarium, you waste of DNA.

BUt I beg you for more condemnation. MORE. You have no idea the degree that it both lift my spirits and reminds me that I am on the right side of things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/79 "2012-06-23T22:30:02Z")

</div>

> [@mister\_nyx](#):
>
> I said it won’t change any votes, you asked if I wanted to make a bet, I pointed out how stupid that was, and you acted like a six-year-old.
> 
> Yep. You’re living down to expectations all right.

I asked you if you wanted to bet they would be USED. YOU claimed that I wanted to bet that they would affect the outcome, even though I said there would be no way to determine that.

Tsk, tsk, tsk.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2012, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042/80 "2012-06-23T22:38:07Z")

</div>

If they were 16 I’d laugh and be glad they at least know who Reagan is.

At their age it makes them look like childish prats. I think most people will see that, and this won’t nudge many fence-sitters one way or the other.

Nazi white supremacists and other hate groups will add the photos to their collections, but who cares?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gay-activists-flip-off-reagans-picture/626042.md?page=5)
