Your analogy is flawed. The DOJ allows other “pride” events. It’s not a matter of stopping any “pride” events. This is about them stopping a SINGLE “pride” event.
I think you should pay people for even accidentally reading your posts. We pay more than enough by reading them, we should be compensated for slogging through your often incomprehensible babble.
No, I didn’t miss the point. And if the DOJ allows other versions of these parties, then of course they should allow all of them.
But I would prefer to see them go the other way and not allow any of them. Then maybe they would serve as a guiding light for my place of employment and I wouldn’t have to put up with the stupidness of all of them.
And the actual event may happen at lunch, and it may not interfere with anything else. If so, then I really have no problem. But at least in my experience, it never works quite that way. You just end up pressured to skip your own lunch so that you can go show your head at an off-time party so that whatever politically important person sponsoring that party will see you there.
But again, let me reiterate what I said in my first post: they are being pricks for blocking THIS party.
Mockingbird. How much do you want per post, and how many of my posts would you estimate you’ve read. Be honest now.
I’d say I’ve read a minimum of 10% of your total posts. I think $5.00 per post would cover it.
So… 220 * 5= $1100.00
A cashier’s cheque will suffice.
How about $0.25/post considering that most were short and wouldn’t have taken much time to figure out.
If that rate is agreeable, email me an address and name (do cahsier’s checks require names, or can I just make it to cash?). I’ll mail a check. But you have to commit to putting me on your ignore list so that I don’t get hit up for further payments.
Ummm … I agree with you completely. Hence the whole “double standards” sentence that made up the first part of my post.
The bit about donating money and then redecorating the Hall was a joke.
It was a funny joke, too. 