# General Patton-The Man and the Movie

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 28, 2006, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552 "2006-06-28T22:00:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2006, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/21 "2006-07-01T02:31:18Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Clothahump]  
He said that Scott was so believable that about 30 seconds into the opening speech, he fully expected Scott to stop, look down from the screen and yell, “SEARS, GODDAMMIT, GET A HAIRCUT BEFORE THE NEXT TIME I SEE YOU!!”  
[/QUOTE]

Reminds me of the scene where Patton insists the company cook wear “leggings” – and then fines him for protesing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tuckerfan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/eada6e/32.png) [@Tuckerfan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tuckerfan)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2006, 10:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/22 "2006-07-02T10:50:08Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]  
Interesting. For all we saw in the movie, he might as well have been celibate. (Not that that was a bad directorial choice. What would performance in bed have to do with his performance as a general?)  
[/QUOTE]

Patton said on several occassions: “A man who won’t fuck won’t fight.”

Scott prepped heavily for the role and watched every piece of film of Patton that he could find. He said in interviews that he intensely disliked the man, but he did his best to portray the man as accurately as he could.

**Sampiro** , I’ve not heard your story (not denying it’s validity, mind you) about the lawsuit. I know that the producers contacted the family about doing the film before they ever started work on it, and the family refused to cooperate, which was understandable, since the producers just happened to call the family on the day that Patton’s widow died and were obviously too upset to think about such things. One of Patton’s grandchildren described going to the theater with his father to see the film, and seeing his father weep because of how good Scott’s performance was.

**Ralph** as for Patton making it into Berlin in 10 days, I asked that question in GQ [and there seems to be some doubt that he could have.](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=134963) For any newbies who might be reading that thread, I’d like to point out that **David Simmons** is a WWII vet, and if he thinks that Patton couldn’t have done it, well, that’s good enough for me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OtakuLoki](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac8455/32.png) [@OtakuLoki](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OtakuLoki)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2006, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/23 "2006-07-02T15:28:49Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]  
Was Patton really the vain, showy jackass Scott portrayed? Did he really wear all those ridiculous extras on his uniform? And – did he really have such a clash of egos with Montgomery that it sometimes seemed the war was between the two of them?  
[/QUOTE]

The uniform issue is fairly well documented. He was a showhorse.

As for having that clash of egos with Montgomery, I can’t say that I have read anything about it particularly, but given British attitudes of the era, and Patton’s behavior when he met Marshall Zhukov\*, it sure sounds likely.

BTW, I thought that he didn’t simply believe he was the rebirth of a long line of ancient warriors, but also the rebirth of Hannibal. Is this correct?  
\*In the movie he’s shown refusing to stand or share a toast with “that son-of-a-bitch.” Which was pretty close to how I recall Zhukov describing the scene in his own autobiography.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_L.A](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_l.a/32/1084_2.png) [@Johnny\_L.A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_L.A)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2006, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/24 "2006-07-02T16:17:56Z")

</div>

Trivia: [Pancho Barnes](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancho_Barnes) knew Patton, when she was a young socialite and before she became a famed aviatrix. (I learned to fly at Barnes Aviation, where dad’s planes were on leaseback.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mamboman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ecb155/32.png) [@mamboman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mamboman)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 1:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/25 "2006-07-03T01:54:43Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Sampiro]  
If they’d gone for nudity it probably would have been of a more disgusting type. During his participation in the campaign against Pancho Villa the young Patton took a bullet to the thigh that tore out a large part of one of his buttocks upon exit. He was _intensely_ proud of the scar and showed it off at every opportunity, even getting arrested on a beach once because he’s tailored his bathing suit to reveal it! (Strange but true.).  
[/QUOTE]

The bullet is the arse he actually copped in WW1, at Meuse-Argonne, figthin alongside Cpt. Harry Truman.

mm

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/26 "2006-07-03T02:00:13Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=OtakuLoki]  
BTW, I thought that he didn’t simply believe he was the rebirth of a long line of ancient warriors, but also the rebirth of Hannibal. Is this correct?  
[/QUOTE]

It would make sense if it were. You might think Hannibal was a bad model for a general who wants to win in the end. OTOH, Hannibal was probably the greatest general in human history ever to end up a loser.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mamboman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ecb155/32.png) [@mamboman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mamboman)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/27 "2006-07-03T02:00:28Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=spoke-]  
Well, I know his dog was not the wimpy pooch portrayed in the movie. It was pugnacious and feared, like its master.  
[/QUOTE]

Carlo D’Este, in his book [A Genius for War](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060927623/qid=1151891872/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-7150656-3409761?s=books&v=glance&n=283155) begs to differ, painting Willie as somewhat of a coward.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/28 "2006-07-03T02:36:36Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]  
Reminds me of the scene where Patton insists the company cook wear “leggings” – and then fines him for protesing.  
[/QUOTE]

BTW, what **are** “leggings”? And why would a soldier wear them?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OtakuLoki](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac8455/32.png) [@OtakuLoki](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OtakuLoki)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/29 "2006-07-03T02:42:23Z")

</div>

Leggings are [heavy canvas wraps](http://www.quanonline.com/military/military_reference/american/wwii_equipment/wwii_leggings.jpg) that go from above the footwear to just below the knee. They are intended to keep barbed wire from catching on the soldier’s pants and tripping him in no-man’s land.

They actually do look pretty sharp in the dress version. But they’re comfortable only if you’re looking at the alternative of having barbed wire stabbing your legs while running.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OttoDaFe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ottodafe/32/356_2.png) [@OttoDaFe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OttoDaFe)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 2:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/30 "2006-07-03T02:43:50Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]  
BTW, what **are** “leggings”? And why would a soldier wear them?  
[/QUOTE]  
[These](http://www.frankscollection.com/military/wwii/leggings.html). Worn to protect the lower legs, and to keep dirt out of one’s boots.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OttoDaFe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ottodafe/32/356_2.png) [@OttoDaFe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OttoDaFe)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 2:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/31 "2006-07-03T02:45:01Z")

</div>

Oh, spit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 2:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/32 "2006-07-03T02:59:37Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=OttoDaFe]  
[These](http://www.frankscollection.com/military/wwii/leggings.html). Worn to protect the lower legs, and to keep dirt out of one’s boots.  
[/QUOTE]

It would be very stupid for a general posted in North Africa (as Patton was, in the scene I mentioned) to require his soldiers to wear such. They might keep the dirt out, but they would also make the soldier too hot to fight effectively.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OttoDaFe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ottodafe/32/356_2.png) [@OttoDaFe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OttoDaFe)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/33 "2006-07-03T15:42:09Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]  
It would be very stupid for a general posted in North Africa (as Patton was, in the scene I mentioned) to require his soldiers to wear such. They might keep the dirt out, but they would also make the soldier too hot to fight effectively.  
[/QUOTE]  
But Patton was apparently a stickler for The Regulations, and if The Regulations dictated that leggings were to be worn, worn they would be.

I recall coming across a Bill Mauldin cartoon depicting a couple of typical—i.e., somewhat ragged and bearded—GIs in a battered Jeep, stopped before a sign indicating that they were entering the Third Army area (Patton’s command). The sign detailed fines for various infractions: $25 for being unshaven, $35 for having the Jeep’s windshield raised, $50 for having the top up, etc.; and since they were in a driving rainstorm, they had their windshield and top up. The caption: “Radio the Old Man and tell him we’ll be late on account of a thousand-mile detour.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/34 "2006-07-03T15:46:55Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=OttoDaFe]  
But Patton was apparently a stickler for The Regulations, and if The Regulations dictated that leggings were to be worn, worn they would be.

I recall coming across a Bill Mauldin cartoon depicting a couple of typical—i.e., somewhat ragged and bearded—GIs in a battered Jeep, stopped before a sign indicating that they were entering the Third Army area (Patton’s command). The sign detailed fines for various infractions: $25 for being unshaven, $35 for having the Jeep’s windshield raised, $50 for having the top up, etc.; and since they were in a driving rainstorm, they had their windshield and top up. The caption: “Radio the Old Man and tell him we’ll be late on account of a thousand-mile detour.”  
[/QUOTE]

Is it true Patton hated Mauldin’s _Up Front_ strip so much he once threatened to have Mauldin arrested?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ColonelDax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/71e660/32.png) [@ColonelDax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ColonelDax)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/35 "2006-07-03T16:56:35Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]  
Is it true Patton hated Mauldin’s _Up Front_ strip so much he once threatened to have Mauldin arrested?  
[/QUOTE]

IIRC, Patton threatened to ban _Stars and Stripes_ from being distributed in Third Army’s sector. Mauldin gives a detailed recounting of his own specially arranged tete-a-tete with Patton in his autobiography, _The Brass Ring_. (An excellent book, IMHO.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sqweels](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@sqweels](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sqweels)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/36 "2006-07-03T18:52:27Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> $35 for having the Jeep’s windshield raised, $50 for having the top up, etc.

This immediately raises the question of why the regs would be stickling about these jeep configurations (keeping the visibility porfile low?). Of course, the cartoon (it was probably “Willie and Joe”) could just be spoofing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tuckerfan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/eada6e/32.png) [@Tuckerfan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tuckerfan)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/37 "2006-07-03T19:00:39Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=sqweels]  
This immediately raises the question of why the regs would be stickling about these jeep configurations (keeping the visibility porfile low?). Of course, the cartoon (it was probably “Willie and Joe”) could just be spoofing.  
[/QUOTE]  
Dunno about the top, but the glass in the windshield would reflect light off of it, thus attracting attention, quite possibly from enemy snipers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 7:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/38 "2006-07-03T19:10:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=sqweels]  
Of course, the cartoon (it was probably “Willie and Joe”) could just be spoofing.  
[/QUOTE]

The strip was called “Up Front,” IIRC. Willie and Joe were the continuing characters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/39 "2006-07-03T19:21:28Z")

</div>

[Found something:](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Mauldin#World_War_II_cartoonist)

> [@](#):
>
> While in the U.S. 45th Infantry Division, he began drawing cartoons about regular soldiers, called dogfaces. Eventually he created two cartoon infantrymen, Willie and Joe, who became synonymous with the average American GI. Mauldin began working for Stars and Stripes, the American soldiers’ newspaper, and his cartoons were viewed by soldiers all over Europe during World War II, and also published in the United States. Willie was on the cover of Time Magazine in 1943 and Mauldin was there in 1958.
> 
> Army officers who were raised in the peacetime army of spit and polish and obedience to orders without question were offended. General George Patton once summoned Mauldin to his office and threatened to “throw his ass in jail” for “spreading dissent”. This after one of Mauldin’s cartoons made fun of Patton’s demand that all soldiers must be clean-shaven and wear ties at all times, even in combat. But Dwight Eisenhower, the Supreme Commander, told Patton to leave Mauldin alone, because he felt that Mauldin’s cartoons gave the soldiers an outlet for their frustrations. Mauldin told an interviewer later, “I always admired Patton. Oh, sure, the stupid bastard was crazy. He was insane. He thought he was living in the Dark Ages. Soldiers were peasants to him. I didn’t like that attitude, but I certainly respected his theories and the techniques he used to get his men out of their foxholes.”
> 
> Mauldin’s cartoons made him a hero to the common soldier. They often credited him with helping them to get through the rigors of the war. Mauldin himself served on the front lines, landing at Anzio, and receiving a Purple Heart for being wounded. He attained the rank of sergeant and was awarded the Army’s Legion of Merit for his cartoons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OneCentStamp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/13edae/32.png) [@OneCentStamp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OneCentStamp)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2006, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552/40 "2006-07-03T20:02:26Z")

</div>

[Here](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060009829/sr=8-3/qid=1151956807/ref=pd_bbs_3/104-0745967-9128768?ie=UTF8) is a biography of Patton I read last year. It was an outstanding read. It confirms many things you would pick up about Patton in the movie (prima donna, believed in reincarnation, wrote poetry, slapped enlisted men, etc.). It also touches on elements glossed over or left out of the movie – the womanizing, the Olympic medal (yep!), the civilian massacres that took place under his command in Italy and were arguably due to an interpretation of his orders, etc.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/general-patton-the-man-and-the-movie/362552.md?page=3)
