# George Rekers' former organization: DADT repeal will lead to rampant raping **URL:** \ **Category:** The BBQ Pit\ **Created:** [May 27, 2010, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/george-rekers-former-organization-dadt-repeal-will-lead-to-rampant-raping/540998 "2010-05-27T21:32:51Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 4
**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2010, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/george-rekers-former-organization-dadt-repeal-will-lead-to-rampant-raping/540998/61 "2010-05-29T16:22:18Z")
> [@elucidator](#): > > I’m going to hell for asking this, but my chances were never all that great anyways… > > How does a lesbian commit “rape” on an unwilling victim? I can certainly see thwarted attraction leading to something akin to harassment, but violent physical assault? Doesn’t make sense, simply on the basis of, well, apparatus. You can rape someone with something other than a penis. But sexual assault doesn’t have to involve forced penetration. ---
**Author:** ![descamisado](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e480ec/32.png) [@descamisado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/descamisado)\ **Post date:** [May 29, 2010, 4:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/george-rekers-former-organization-dadt-repeal-will-lead-to-rampant-raping/540998/62 "2010-05-29T16:37:22Z")
> [@jsgoddess](#): > > You can rape someone with something other than a penis. > > But sexual assault doesn’t have to involve forced penetration. Given the acts that the FRC includes under the heading of rape, it’s especially important for people to be understand this. ---
**Author:** ![Annie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/858c86/32.png) [@Annie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie)\ **Post date:** [May 31, 2010, 12:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/george-rekers-former-organization-dadt-repeal-will-lead-to-rampant-raping/540998/63 "2010-05-31T00:58:14Z")
> [@RickJay](#): > > Unless you can find some reliable sources for that, that sounds just a bit over the top. [Time Magazine a reputable enough source?](http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1968110,00.html)(Caveat: editorial columnist, not an article.) [And some first person accounts](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8005198.stm), including one who talks about the avoiding water to avoid latrine visits. ---
**Author:** ![Sampiro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/2acd7d/32.png) [@Sampiro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sampiro)\ **Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/george-rekers-former-organization-dadt-repeal-will-lead-to-rampant-raping/540998/64 "2010-06-01T19:54:53Z")
Comes now the Family Research Council (NAMBLA) [and says](http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/06/01/my-take-ending-dont-ask-dont-tell-would-undermine-religious-liberty/)that allowing open homosexual soldiers > [@](#): > > …would mean simultaneously ushering out the back door anyone who disapproves of homosexual conduct, whether because of legitimate privacy and health concerns or because of moral or religious convictions. > > ## This outcome is almost inevitable, because pro-homosexual activists have made it clear that merely lifting the “ban” on openly homosexual military personnel will not satisfy them. > > This means that all 1.4 million members of the U.S. military will be subject to sensitivity training intended to indoctrinate them into the myths of the homosexual movement: that people are born “gay” and cannot change and that homosexual conduct does no harm to the individual or to society. DAMN IT! Who keeps opening their cockholes and blabbing our plans to them? If we’re ever to make the U.S. Armed Forces the world’s largest single collection of porn stars and dating pool on Earth and then use them to open fire on known Christians then we need to exercise some discretion in who we talk to and how much we tell. (This has "bisexual double agent’ written all over it.) But seriously folks- I really do wonder how FRC would respond to “The exact same rhetoric was used when the army was racially integrated”. My guess would be their response would be “And your point is…?”. ---
**Author:** ![Illuminatiprimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/illuminatiprimus/32/11520_2.png) [@Illuminatiprimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Illuminatiprimus)\ **Post date:** [June 1, 2010, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/george-rekers-former-organization-dadt-repeal-will-lead-to-rampant-raping/540998/65 "2010-06-01T22:36:47Z")
> [@Sampiro](#): > > But seriously folks- I really do wonder how FRC would respond to “The exact same rhetoric was used when the army was racially integrated”. My guess would be their response would be “And your point is…?”. “If bigotry was good enough for my grand pappy, it’s good enough for me dag nabbit.” ---
**Author:** ![Sampiro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/2acd7d/32.png) [@Sampiro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sampiro)\ **Post date:** [June 2, 2010, 1:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/george-rekers-former-organization-dadt-repeal-will-lead-to-rampant-raping/540998/66 "2010-06-02T01:18:58Z")
> [@Illuminatiprimus](#): > > “If bigotry was good enough for my grand pappy, it’s good enough for me dag nabbit.” Reminds me of [this Onion video](http://www.theonion.com/video/semiliterate-former-gold-prospector-given-own-cabl,17408/). [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/george-rekers-former-organization-dadt-repeal-will-lead-to-rampant-raping/540998.md?page=3)