# Girl throws puppies in river (WARNING: Video of animal cruelty)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [August 31, 2010, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195 "2010-08-31T22:55:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/81 "2010-09-01T18:28:54Z")

</div>

Edited: never mind, **Miller** addressed the abortion hijack while I was posting.

> [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](#):
>
> > [@Claude\_Remains](#):
> >
> > Yes! the fact that time and effort were spent to get that video here for us all to enjoy so much is the crux of my outrage. I know that animal control is a very real issue no matter where you go, and I’m a sick fuck, but this is too much. I cant help but think that someone, somewhere is masterbating to that clip.
> 
> Movie producers spend millions of dollars each on violent movies full of torturous scenes that attract the general public. Outraged about that ?

Are you really that fucking stupid? The last time I checked, movies are fake. Those “violent, torturous scenes” aren’t real. Ever heard of something called “special effects?” No one is actually being tortured, dumbass.  
This was an actual person, deliberately getting a kick out of harming animals. It’s not just the “cuteness factor”, either. It’s the fact that people enjoy torturing helpless creatures. That’s a sociopathic trait.

Yes, the fact that the puppies ARE cute plays into it, I’m not going to deny that. However, people who go out and start torturing animals are seriously fucked up. Ask any psychologist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 6:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/82 "2010-09-01T18:40:19Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> > [@Sailboat](#):
> >
> > Don’t anybody interpret “faster and more humane” to mean slaughterhouses are actually humane by any standard.
> 
> Why not? They are, the overwhelming majority of the time.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

Gotta back **Shodan** on this one. Especially since the work of Temple Grandin began to find implentation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/83 "2010-09-01T18:44:38Z")

</div>

> [@Sailboat](#):
>
> Slaughterhouses are nasty businesses at best and you know it.

No they’re not, and therefore no I don’t.

> [@](#):
>
> Humans sure haven’t liked it whenever _we’ve_ been shipped to industrial processing centers and slaughtered.

At least you have made clear what kind of thinking your assertions are based on.

You don’t think there might be just the teensiest, weeniest bit of difference between killing people and killing chickens?

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bucketybuck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/898d66/32.png) [@bucketybuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bucketybuck)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/84 "2010-09-01T19:07:21Z")

</div>

> [@rhubarbarin](#):
>
> This is and always has been a normal way to quickly kill unwanted puppies and kittens. Don’t see the big deal frankly. You people are so weird about animals (and I say this as someone with three dogs and two cats).

> [@rhubarbarin](#):
>
> What glee? What mugging? All I saw was a quick, methodical drowning. How is this more cruel than how unwanted animals in the USA are killed ? A lethal injection stabbed straight into the abdomen or gassing are the most common methods.

I grew up in a rural area, and have been party to the drowning of unwanted puppies/kittens. When that had to be done, well, it had to be done, so we got a bag and got it done. We werent happy about it, these are living creatures after all, but we did it.

The linked video is different in my eyes. Somebody carrying out the necessary task of culling a litter would have lifted the bucket and put all of the puppies in the river in one go (assuming the lack of a bag with a rock in it). Anybody with a trace of emphathy would have been at best stoic about a harsh task.

Most creatures are hardwired to protect newborns (yeah yeah hyperbole). Most kids go gooey at newborn puppies/kittens/bunnies/anything. To my mind, there is something lacking about a very young girl picking up newborn puppies and lobbing them merrily into a river for shits and giggles.

Some posters indicated that this might be different because it was in Croatia or whatever, but I disagree, because even in eastern bloc countries, children are children. This girl is missing something basic, and it is her that I find disturbing, not the death of some puppies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rhubarbarin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb9ed0/32.png) [@rhubarbarin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rhubarbarin)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 7:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/85 "2010-09-01T19:25:22Z")

</div>

> [@Nzinga\_Seated](#):
>
> > [@rhubarbarin](#):
> >
> > This is and always has been a normal way to quickly kill unwanted puppies and kittens. Don’t see the big deal frankly. You people are so weird about animals (and I say this as someone with three dogs and two cats).
> 
> I did not know this. I am not the type to get all softy about animal abuse. I really think it smacks of hypocrisy for me to fry up steaks for my daughter and husband and then act all fragile about a kitten in a trashcan.
> 
> But I really did think something must be…\*wrong \*with someone who just throws puppies in a river for seemingly no reason. (I mean, couldn’t she take them to the pound?) I had no idea it was a normal way to deal with unwanted puppies.

The parental attitude towards dogs and cats that many people in developed countries have acquired in the last 50 years is the product of a modern, sanitized society where people aren’t exposed to the realities of life and death. There are countless historical references to drowning unwanted kittens and puppies; it’s an economic way to kill and dispose of them. In places where there are fewer services to assist with random-bred animals or just where there are a lot of animals that aren’t fixed, this shit happens all the time. Even in places where there is a shelter system, often people prefer to kill the babies when they are tiny rather than go through the expense (often steep) of raising them until they are weaned so they can try to home them with people they know, or drop them off at the shelter - where they have a good chance of ending their lives by being gassed to death or killed by lethal injection (often by T-61 which is a rather painful, scary way to go).

I see absolutely nothing morally wrong with drowning unwanted infant animals (although I would never do so myself). As for this particular video; that girl was doing a job. Most likely one given her by her parents. She did it quickly and efficiently, with no evidence of pleasure.

I’ve mentioned before that I grew up in a farming community. Drowning unwanted litters of kittens and puppies happened in South Dakota in the 1990s, as well as many other things that involved cute, furry animals being hurt and killed in various ways. I’ve seen baby sheep have their testicles bloodily removed without painkillers; that was a bit harsh. Drowning isn’t a bad way to die, no matter your species or how cute you are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nzinga\_Seated](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/b5ac83/32.png) [@Nzinga\_Seated](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nzinga_Seated)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/86 "2010-09-01T19:31:43Z")

</div>

> [@bucketybuck](#):
>
> This girl is missing something basic, and it is her that I find disturbing, not the death of some puppies.

This is precisely how I felt. Precisely. But after rhubarbarin’s post (and your’s too, actually) I’m seeing it clearer, now.

Perhaps the first time she ever had to do this, it tore her up. But she may be used to such things by now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rhubarbarin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb9ed0/32.png) [@rhubarbarin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rhubarbarin)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/87 "2010-09-01T19:33:38Z")

</div>

> [@bucketybuck](#):
>
> > [@rhubarbarin](#):
> >
> > This is and always has been a normal way to quickly kill unwanted puppies and kittens. Don’t see the big deal frankly. You people are so weird about animals (and I say this as someone with three dogs and two cats).
> 
> > [@rhubarbarin](#):
> >
> > What glee? What mugging? All I saw was a quick, methodical drowning. How is this more cruel than how unwanted animals in the USA are killed ? A lethal injection stabbed straight into the abdomen or gassing are the most common methods.
> 
> I grew up in a rural area, and have been party to the drowning of unwanted puppies/kittens. When that had to be done, well, it had to be done, so we got a bag and got it done. We werent happy about it, these are living creatures after all, but we did it.
> 
> The linked video is different in my eyes. Somebody carrying out the necessary task of culling a litter would have lifted the bucket and put all of the puppies in the river in one go (assuming the lack of a bag with a rock in it). Anybody with a trace of emphathy would have been at best stoic about a harsh task.
> 
> Most creatures are hardwired to protect newborns (yeah yeah hyperbole). Most kids go gooey at newborn puppies/kittens/bunnies/anything. To my mind, there is something lacking about a very young girl picking up newborn puppies and lobbing them merrily into a river for shits and giggles.
> 
> Some posters indicated that this might be different because it was in Croatia or whatever, but I disagree, because even in eastern bloc countries, children are children. This girl is missing something basic, and it is her that I find disturbing, not the death of some puppies.

Huh. Well, the farm kids I grew up with killed things all the time (deer/pheasant/chicken/geese/ducks/pigs/lambs/kittens/rats/mice etc), sometimes with their bare hands, and all of them appeared to be well-adjusted normal individuals (and those I am still facebook friends with still appear to be non-sociopathic). I would say that plenty of them actively enjoyed killing things (especially when hunting), and most didn’t appear to have any strong emotion at all about killing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rhubarbarin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb9ed0/32.png) [@rhubarbarin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rhubarbarin)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 7:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/88 "2010-09-01T19:36:49Z")

</div>

bucketybuck, maybe she didn’t just lower the bucket into the water to drown them together because she didn’t want to see them struggle and cry right in front of her.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bucketybuck](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/898d66/32.png) [@bucketybuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bucketybuck)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 7:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/89 "2010-09-01T19:44:33Z")

</div>

> [@rhubarbarin](#):
>
> bucketybuck, maybe she didn’t just lower the bucket into the water to drown them together because she didn’t want to see them struggle and cry right in front of her.

Who says lower the bucket? Lift bucket, tip bucket, job done.

You mention words like methodical, efficient. Getting a friend to video you throwing the puppies one by one is not efficient. Lift the bucket, step to the river bank, tip the bucket. That girl wasnt blase about killing some puppies, she was making a game of it. Who makes a game out of killing newborns?

And I am not sure hunting equates, because who hunts newborns?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rhubarbarin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb9ed0/32.png) [@rhubarbarin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rhubarbarin)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 7:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/90 "2010-09-01T19:52:05Z")

</div>

Of course children who are instructed to kill newborn puppies on a regular basis could treat it as a game. The kids who where in charge of raising and caring for the chickens that supplied the eggs and broilers for our co-op used to play a game that involved stomping baby rats (just as cute as puppies) to death - I found this gross and scary as a kid, but they were perfectly nice, polite, caring children (who strangled/broke hundreds of chicken necks every year to feed us all). I disagree that there is any inherent empathy for animals or baby animals in humans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rhubarbarin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/eb9ed0/32.png) [@rhubarbarin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rhubarbarin)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/91 "2010-09-01T19:59:42Z")

</div>

> [@bucketybuck](#):
>
> > [@rhubarbarin](#):
> >
> > bucketybuck, maybe she didn’t just lower the bucket into the water to drown them together because she didn’t want to see them struggle and cry right in front of her.
> 
> Who says lower the bucket? Lift bucket, tip bucket, job done.
> 
> You mention words like methodical, efficient. Getting a friend to video you throwing the puppies one by one is not efficient. Lift the bucket, step to the river bank, tip the bucket. That girl wasnt blase about killing some puppies, she was making a game of it. Who makes a game out of killing newborns?
> 
> And I am not sure hunting equates, because who hunts newborns?

I kill mice. Rather than step on them, drown them in a bucket, or twist their necks (all more direct, blase methods than mine) I prefer to put them in a paper lunch bag and smack them against the wall to kill with impact. Simply because I am a bit squeamish and I don’t want to feel them die with my hands, or watch them expire right in front of my eyes. ‘Mouse-in-a-bag’ isn’t really a game to me, but it’s surely not necessary. And I don’t feel guilty or sad about the mouse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rushgeekgirl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rushgeekgirl/32/3715_2.png) [@Rushgeekgirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rushgeekgirl)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/92 "2010-09-01T20:36:16Z")

</div>

> [@Claude\_Remains](#):
>
> > [@Rushgeekgirl](#):
> >
> > I didn’t realize it would be a video actually showing this person throwing living, crying puppies into a lake. I thought it was a link to a news story. Wish I’d read Cat Fight’s post first.
> 
> Sorry. I dropped the ball and did not warn about actual animal abuse video.
> 
> Can a Mod kindly slip a warning into my OP?

Eh it was my fault for not reading ahead but thank you for asking to put up a warning.  
Some of us are delicate flowers around here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FoieGrasIsEvil](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foiegrasisevil/32/16638_2.png) [@FoieGrasIsEvil](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FoieGrasIsEvil)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/93 "2010-09-01T20:43:39Z")

</div>

> [@gonzomax](#):
>
> > [@Ferret\_Herder](#):
> >
> > Pfft. People kill kittens every day by masturbating (thanks, Fark!), so that’d barely rate a second thought. 😛
> 
> Nobody masturbates everyday.

Pfft. I’m married, I don’t have a choice. Maybe I should save all my sperm in a big bucket or something and then take it to a river and videotape myself tossing cupfuls of my jizz into the water, killing all the helpless little tadpoles.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9fc348/32.png) [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Flying_Dutchman)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/94 "2010-09-01T21:32:18Z")

</div>

> [@Guinastasia](#):
>
> > [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](#):
> >
> > Movie producers spend millions of dollars each on violent movies full of torturous scenes that attract the general public. Outraged about that ?
> 
> Are you really that fucking stupid? The last time I checked, movies are fake. Those “violent, torturous scenes” aren’t real. Ever heard of something called “special effects?” No one is actually being tortured, dumbass.

Of all the poster’s here, you have the most serious reading comprehension problem. I was responding to **Claude’s** specific concern about the display of the incident rather than the incident itself for the enjoyment of others. Did you watch the video? Why ?

> [@](#):
>
> This was an actual person, deliberately getting a kick out of harming animals. It’s not just the “cuteness factor”, either. It’s the fact that people enjoy torturing helpless creatures. That’s a sociopathic trait.

Did you notice how gently she handled those pups?

> [@](#):
>
> Yes, the fact that the puppies ARE cute plays into it, I’m not going to deny that. However, people who go out and start torturing animals are seriously fucked up. Ask any psychologist.

She wasn’t torturing the pups. She was simply terminating them. And whether she actually enjoyed the experience is debatable. The “whee” is disturbing but that may be like laughing in the face of a trajedy. She may have had nothing to do with the video taping either. In fact, I’d expect the reason she was wearing a glove was to distance herself from the intimacy of direct contact making her job more uncomfortable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smoke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c5a1d2/32.png) [@smoke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smoke)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 10:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/95 "2010-09-01T22:09:54Z")

</div>

I’d expect the reason she was wearing a glove was to keep from touching the piss and shit on the puppies piled in the bucket.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fish\_Cheer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fish_cheer/32/17179_2.png) [@Fish\_Cheer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fish_Cheer)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 10:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/96 "2010-09-01T22:20:26Z")

</div>

> [@LadyJane84](#):
>
> animals don’t have an inherent right to life

😕 Pray tell, why not?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nzinga\_Seated](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/b5ac83/32.png) [@Nzinga\_Seated](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nzinga_Seated)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/97 "2010-09-01T22:47:08Z")

</div>

I’ve decided that this is my wild ass stab in the dark.

The girl is used to dealing with animals and death, probably a farm girl. The video taper is probably a bit more internet savvy than her and realized that a lot of us in webland would be shocked, shocked at what she was doing.

The girl is the one being exploited. It is par for the course for her, but she doesn’t realize the kid with the video is going to paint her as a psychotic animal abuser. Now that the btards are on her, I’m actually feeling sorry for her.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 11:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/98 "2010-09-01T23:10:55Z")

</div>

> [@Fish\_Cheer](#):
>
> > [@LadyJane84](#):
> >
> > animals don’t have an inherent right to life
> 
> 😕 Pray tell, why not?

I’m often accused of turning every debate into a legal one. In a concurrent thread, defending this tendency, I said:

> [@Whack-a-Mole did something really stupid](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/whack-a-mole-did-something-really-stupid/551862/31):
>
> In my view, it’s more often the case that an issue has both a legal aspect and a non-legal policy aspect. And in those cases, I tend to focus on the legal - obviously.
> 
> Not wrong, but perhaps myopic.
> 
> But the other side of the coin is that recourse to the law gives finality of an answer. We may bicker about what the policy SHOULD be; we can much more often point definitively to what the law _IS_. So I gravitate in that direction because it’s a debate ender. You’ll never convince me that abortion is not a grave moral wrong. I’ll never convince you it’s not a matter of a woman’s right to choose.
> 
> But we both must acknowledge that it’s a right of constitutional dimension.

And this statement reminds me of why I do this.

I could say, “Animals don’t have an inherent right to life because it’s silly to say they do!”

But of course the response is, “Who says it’s silly?”

I’m sure you can generate any number of equally unpersuasive claims and rejoinders. Without any agreement between sides on the source, nature, and quality of “rights,” it seems well-nigh impossible to make a definitive statement on whether animals do, or do not, have an inherent right to life.

But – if we define “right,” as something for which society is prepared to provide a remedy at law for the deprivation of, then, by George, then we can easily settle the issue. Someone may claim there’s right to life for animals, and my response can be, “OK. CLaim it. Pick it off the tree where you believe it grows. Because if the claimed ‘right,’ is not one that society is prepared to recognize with a remedy at law, then it doesn’t exist.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AClockworkMelon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aclockworkmelon/32/10803_2.png) [@AClockworkMelon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AClockworkMelon)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/99 "2010-09-01T23:13:37Z")

</div>

> [@Fish\_Cheer](#):
>
> > [@LadyJane84](#):
> >
> > animals don’t have an inherent right to life
> 
> 😕 Pray tell, why not?

I’m assuming you’re a vegan, then?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZPG\_Zealot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/e47c2d/32.png) [@ZPG\_Zealot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZPG_Zealot)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2010, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195/100 "2010-09-01T23:16:37Z")

</div>

> [@Nzinga\_Seated](#):
>
> I’ve decided that this is my wild ass stab in the dark.
> 
> The girl is used to dealing with animals and death, probably a farm girl. The video taper is probably a bit more internet savvy than her and realized that a lot of us in webland would be shocked, shocked at what she was doing.
> 
> The girl is the one being exploited. It is par for the course for her, but she doesn’t realize the kid with the video is going to paint her as a psychotic animal abuser. Now that the btards are on her, I’m actually feeling sorry for her.

I tend to agree with you. Donning asbestos: when I was a child, my cousins and I use to enjoy what we called headless chicken fights. Basically, it involved at least two people who had the task of killing a chicken (to be eaten) to get together kill the chickens simultaneously and throw them into a large tub thus limiting how far their bodies could go. It was considered the fun part of chicken killing.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/girl-throws-puppies-in-river-warning-video-of-animal-cruelty/552195.md?page=6)
