# Global Warming **URL:** \ **Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\ **Created:** [April 7, 2006, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/global-warming/351715 "2006-04-07T13:50:36Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 6
**Author:** ![saoirse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/5daacb/32.png) [@saoirse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/saoirse)\ **Post date:** [April 29, 2006, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/global-warming/351715/101 "2006-04-29T03:37:22Z")
> [@Askance](#): > > I’m afraid you do not RC; at current consumption rates there are 50 years of cheaply accessible reserves and 150-200 years of expensive reserves (cites below). I love the “something else will present itself” 🙂 These equations always use current consumption rates, though. Suppose we put a quarter of all the Chinese and a quarter of all the Indians in Lincoln Navigators in the next 25 years. How are our fuel supplies going to hold up then? ---
**Author:** ![clairobscur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/839c29/32.png) [@clairobscur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/clairobscur)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2006, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/global-warming/351715/102 "2006-05-01T16:16:52Z")
> [@xtisme](#): > > So, if we could achieve ‘90% nuclear’ in a decade or two (probably be difficult by not impossible…Europe expecially is already well on the way, at least in countries like France) Actually, in Europe, France is the exception rather than the norm. Moreover the trend is towards a a lesser use of nuclear power in Europe, due to the concerns of environementalists. For instance, Germany has completely stopped building nuclear power plants and, with older plants closing, should be nuclear-free in the future. ---
**Author:** ![RiverRunner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/977dab/32.png) [@RiverRunner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RiverRunner)\ **Post date:** [May 2, 2006, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/global-warming/351715/103 "2006-05-02T20:10:01Z")
> [@clairobscur](#): > > For instance, Germany has completely stopped building nuclear power plants and, with older plants closing, should be nuclear-free in the future. What are they moving to? RR ---
**Author:** ![tracer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tracer/32/20578_2.png) [@tracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tracer)\ **Post date:** [May 2, 2006, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/global-warming/351715/104 "2006-05-02T23:41:02Z")
> [@clairobscur](#): > > Moreover the trend is towards a a lesser use of nuclear power in Europe, due to the concerns of environementalists. Oh, the irony. > [@](#): > > For instance, Germany has completely stopped building nuclear power plants and, with older plants closing, should be nuclear-free in the future. Back to the good old days, where we generated electric power by burning kittens, I guess. ---
**Author:** ![sleeepy2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@sleeepy2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sleeepy2)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2006, 1:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/global-warming/351715/105 "2006-05-12T13:23:41Z")
> [@What Exit?](#): > > 1. Pass laws to make Energy Star compliance either mandatory or to load an additional tax on non-compliant equipment. > > Jim [Energy Star may not be a useful indicator after all.](http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/30/earlyshow/living/money/main1456344.shtml) ---
**Author:** ![Askance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/askance/32/8281_2.png) [@Askance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Askance)\ **Post date:** [May 15, 2006, 4:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/global-warming/351715/106 "2006-05-15T04:24:58Z")
[QUOTE=RiverRunner] What are they moving to? [/QUOTE] Wave, wind, solar, gas turbines. [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/global-warming/351715.md?page=5)