# God DAMMIT Bricker, Just for once admit you were WRONG !

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [July 22, 2006, 11:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592 "2006-07-22T11:34:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crotalus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crotalus/32/41_2.png) [@Crotalus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crotalus)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2006, 4:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/61 "2006-07-24T16:40:27Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cartooniverse]  
\<snip\>He couldnt’ seem to find his way to that set of cites and facts, I and others were perfectly capable of doing so. Hence the Pitting. \<snip\>  
[/QUOTE]  
So, you are pitting **Bricker** because he didn’t Google as well as you did, a failing he admitted. You are an amazing asshole.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2006, 5:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/62 "2006-07-24T17:23:20Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cartooniverse]

**Contrapuntal** , your attempt to stir the pot further given my quite serious apology to **tomndebb** does nothing to contribute to this thread. I’d appreciate it if you didn’t try to tell the world what I am saying. If you feel my post is in need of special attention, and you are capable of proving somehow that my post was not what it appeared to be ( an apology ) well, that’s what that nifty little exclamation point is for in the right-hand region of your post.

Or, was the purpose of your post to make my say yet again what I said before, just for your perverse gratification? Perhaps that is it. Well, who knows. Since I stand by my previous posts, and you seem hell-bent on calling me an insincere liar, here you go:

**tomndebb** is completely correct and I would never think to debate any of his statements.

I therefore must apologize for what is apparently a gross misunderstanding on my part.

Sorry there, Bricker ! You could not have been more correct in your statements in the thread linked to in the OP. Additional apologies for using arrest cases for cites that did not fulfill the requirements as put forth in your posts. My bad.

I meant what I wrote. I’m sorry that you see fit to attack an apology, but there’s nothing I can do about that other than to have repeated my apology.

Which I just did.

Cartooniverse  
[/QUOTE]  
_mea culpa_. I said I would be happy to admit I was wrong and I do. I thought I detected irony in your use of absolutes; apparently my eye failed me and I spoke in error. Please accept my sincere apology. It was wrong of me to say what I said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2006, 12:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/63 "2006-07-25T00:22:21Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cartooniverse]  
Sorry there, Bricker ! You could not have been more correct in your statements in the thread linked to in the OP. Additional apologies for using arrest cases for cites that did not fulfill the requirements as put forth in your posts. My bad.

[/QUOTE]

Whenever you offer a sincere apology in a situation like this, I of course accept it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2006, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/64 "2006-07-25T00:32:10Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bricker]  
Whenever you offer a sincere apology in a situation like this, I of course accept it.  
[/QUOTE]

Bricker, will you _please_ just admit that you were wrong? For once in your life, can you acknowledge that you were in error? 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2006, 3:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/65 "2006-07-25T03:02:18Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Cartooniverse]  
Did I pit **Bricker** because the person in the cite was found not guilty?  
[/QUOTE]

Matter of fact, you pitted **Bricker** because he would not admit he was wrong. He did, in fact, as cited, admit twice that he was wrong. You have chosen to deflect the pitting to the fact that he was, as already admitted, wrong. You are, for some reason unknown to me, stating that the fact he was wrong in this instance proves the case your OP attempts to make that **Bricker** never admits he is wrong.

Would you care to state, in plain English, that the premise of your OP (that **Bricker** never admits he is wrong), is, at least in this particular instance, if not in general, is incorrect, and that your OP was misguided?

(And I’d like to add that the title of SDSAB below a member’s name does not confer some sort of magic immunity from logical attack. **Bricker** gets attacked plenty; I expect that will continue, and I expect I’ll participate as appropriate. This attack, though, is nonsense.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_One](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/45deac/32.png) [@Evil\_One](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_One)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2006, 1:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/66 "2006-07-25T13:24:31Z")

</div>

So what does SDSAB stand for?

No really. I’m not being sarcastic. I really don’t know.

I can guess the first two letters of course…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2006, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/67 "2006-07-25T13:28:05Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Frank]  
Would you care to state, in plain English, that the premise of your OP (that **Bricker** never admits he is wrong), is, at least in this particular instance, if not in general, is incorrect, and that your OP was misguided?  
[/QUOTE]  
The OP was overstated; to the contrary, \*\*Bricker \*\* is one of the few posters to apologize frequently and without reservation when he is wrong. Or needs to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Telemark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/telemark/32/372_2.png) [@Telemark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Telemark)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2006, 2:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/68 "2006-07-25T14:45:09Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Evil One]  
So what does SDSAB stand for? .  
[/QUOTE]

Straight Dope Science Advisory Board

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![saoirse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/5daacb/32.png) [@saoirse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/saoirse)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2006, 2:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/69 "2006-07-25T14:57:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=saoirse]  
But once again, he was not found not guilty. The judge ruled that the prosecutor had no cause to bring the charge in the first place. **That is nothing like being found not guilty.**  
[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Cartooniverse]  
Oh my word. The definition of Echolalia seems appropriate here.

Fine. No problem. Once again, allow me to re-clarify: The OP does not address whether or not the person in the cite was found guilty, or whether or not the person in the cite was given a darned Peabody Award for killing someone while using a cellular phone behind the wheel. \*\*Yes, i agree. There is nothing like being found not guilty. \*\*  
[/QUOTE]

I understand now: you’re retarded. You have my pity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2006, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/70 "2006-07-25T15:38:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Bricker had an out that I don’t think he tried to take advantage of. There’s a huge difference between saying “I can’t find…” and saying “There are no…”.

Yeah, that’s one of the ways you can tell he’s a lawyer, and possibly a former judicial clerk. Most judge’s clerks are taught never to say “there is no cite” or “no law exists on this point.” In the vast majority of written opinions, the court will say “Party X provided no authority for [whatever position]” or “we are unable to find any authority to support [whatever position].” This is because you never know when someone will pull out an 1742 Admiralty decision from South Assboink that arguably, possibly, if you squint, might be relevant. So yes, this is an out, and it’s one BRICKER uses intentionally (and good for him).

BRICKER –

> [@](#):
>
> Whenever you offer a sincere apology in a situation like this, I of course accept it.

Very admirable. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2006, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/71 "2006-07-26T20:38:18Z")

</div>

If only this were a court of law, and not the court of public opinion here, if only. Then that “debate” approach would be mere technical proficiency in action, not crass weaseling.

However, to _normal_ people in _normal_ contexts, the statement “I know of no instance where …” is virtually indistinguishable from “You’re making that shit up”. **Bricker** might indeed not be any more aware of that than you seem to be, of course - in fact, I’m almost sure of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2006, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/72 "2006-07-26T23:05:23Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _Originally posted by **ElvisL1ves** _  
> However, to _normal_ people in _normal_ contexts, the statement . . . .

OTOH, this is the Straight Dope® and I have not seen two _normal_ posters, here, in the last nine years, so I’m not sure what you hoped to express in that post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Morgyn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/morgyn/32/3041_2.png) [@Morgyn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Morgyn)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2006, 11:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/73 "2006-07-26T23:07:17Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=tomndebb]  
OTOH, this is the Straight Dope® and I have not seen two _normal_ posters, here, in the last nine years, so I’m not sure what you hoped to express in that post.  
[/QUOTE]  
It’s all in the context, baby. 🆒

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2006, 1:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/74 "2006-07-27T01:06:56Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Fear Itself]  
The OP was overstated; to the contrary, \*\*Bricker \*\* is one of the few posters to apologize frequently and without reservation when he is wrong. Or needs to.  
[/QUOTE]

I’m glad _somebody_ understood that sentence, because on rereading it yesterday morning, I was not sure I did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2006, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592/75 "2006-07-27T01:07:54Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Fear Itself]

> [@Frank](#):
>
> Would you care to state, in plain English, that the premise of your OP (that Bricker never admits he is wrong), is, at least in this particular instance, if not in general, is incorrect, and that your OP was misguided?

The OP was overstated; to the contrary, \*\*Bricker \*\* is one of the few posters to apologize frequently and without reservation when he is wrong. Or needs to.  
[/QUOTE]

I’m glad _somebody_ understood that sentence, because on rereading it yesterday morning, I was not sure I did.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/god-dammit-bricker-just-for-once-admit-you-were-wrong/365592.md?page=3)
