# Going Clear, Alex Gibney's new documentary about Scientology

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [March 29, 2015, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259 "2015-03-29T03:10:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![detlep](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/dbc845/32.png) [@detlep](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/detlep)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/201 "2015-04-06T00:47:15Z")

</div>

Watching Hubbard demonstrate the e-meter brings to mind the audacity with which Clifford Irving sold his hoax to McGraw Hill.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![F.U.Shakespeare](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/aca169/32.png) [@F.U.Shakespeare](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/F.U.Shakespeare)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 1:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/202 "2015-04-06T01:54:22Z")

</div>

A mid-1990’s article in _Spy_ magazine by journalist [Mark Ebner](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Ebner) had a picture of Hubbard with an E-meter hooked up to a tomato, with the caption, “You say Tomato, I say Travolta”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dasmoocher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/dbc845/32.png) [@dasmoocher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dasmoocher)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/203 "2015-04-06T02:15:36Z")

</div>

> [@Equipoise](#):
>
> If there are, too bad for them. The cult would probably force them to quit, the way they forced Issac Hayes to quit South Park. He didn’t want to quit. He LOVED South Park. The loss of the paycheck really hurt him too.
> 
> [https://www.nolanchart.com/article4477-did-scientology-kill-isaac-hayes-html](https://www.nolanchart.com/article4477-did-scientology-kill-isaac-hayes-html)

They killed Issac Hayes!? Those bastards!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 2:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/204 "2015-04-06T02:27:50Z")

</div>

> [@Rick\_Kitchen](#):
>
> I wonder if any of the members of SNL are Scienos.

This annoys me no end. This is not a word, and it is not the proper deprecating term. They are called “Clams”, which has something to do with Hubbard declaring that humans are thence descended. This is why the site linked earlier in this thread is called “ClamBake”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 2:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/205 "2015-04-06T02:47:01Z")

</div>

> [@eschereal](#):
>
> This annoys me no end. This is not a word, and it is not the proper deprecating term. They are called “Clams”, which has something to do with Hubbard declaring that humans are thence descended. This is why the site linked earlier in this thread is called “ClamBake”.

…and the recommended taunt is “Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!”…done while snapping one’s fingers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 2:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/206 "2015-04-06T02:57:14Z")

</div>

Great documentary and really informative.

Ultimately, I simply feel no pity for the suckers who will delude reality for their ill-gotten fool’s gold “happiness.”

It’s their own fault for falling prey to a cult.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 3:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/207 "2015-04-06T03:06:57Z")

</div>

> [@Stringbean](#):
>
> Great documentary and really informative.
> 
> Ultimately, I simply feel no pity for the suckers who will delude reality for their ill-gotten fool’s gold “happiness.”
> 
> It’s their own fault for falling prey to a cult.

As I said earlier, the best part was Paul Haggis explaining how an intelligent, rational person could get sucked in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 4:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/208 "2015-04-06T04:12:07Z")

</div>

To follow up on myself, I’m quite confident the members of _Heaven’s Gate_ weren’t recruited with a promise that they would end up dead in brand new sneakers of poisoned pudding. You don’t get followers by showing them the crazy right off the bat, you need something to reel them in at the start.

That’s why the film showed people saying that, at least in the early parts, they got something out of it. Some who escape the cult still follow Hubbard’s teachings, or at least the parts that made sense for them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Equipoise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/equipoise/32/151_2.png) [@Equipoise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Equipoise)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 5:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/209 "2015-04-06T05:36:01Z")

</div>

Here’s a very low-budget video, but if you overlook that, a fun and potent video about [“How To Be A Cult Leader”](https://youtu.be/mnNSe5XYp6E)

> [@F.U.Shakespeare](#):
>
> A mid-1990’s article in _Spy_ magazine by journalist [Mark Ebner](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Ebner) had a picture of Hubbard with an E-meter hooked up to a tomato, with the caption, “You say Tomato, I say Travolta”.

We bought that on the newsstand at the time! [Here’s the actual article](http://www.hollywoodinterrupted.com/2006/03/23/ebner-undercover-scientology-spy-magazine-1996/) for Spy. I love how he starts out by dead agenting himself to get in before the $cieno, er, clams do.

[QUOTE=Mark Ebner]  
I am an ex-drug addict who has solicited prostitutes in my day. I’ve also masturbated and inhaled at the same time, and I have been arrested more than once in my life. I dropped out of high school, and I’ve been under psychiatric care. Oh yeah, and I owe the IRS roughly six thousand dollars that they are well aware of.

In the language of Scientologists, the above information reflects what they include in their “Dead Agent Packs”-dossiers of all the dirt they dig up on people critical of their “religion.” Often they disseminate damaging information like this to the friends, family, landlords, and employers of anyone who dares speak of–or worse, publish anything derogatory about the “church.” So what I’m doing here is Dead Agenting myself before we begin, beating them to the punch.  
[/QUOTE]

I follow [Ebner on Twitter](https://twitter.com/MarkEbner59) and he recently retweeted me. Come on, shut up, it was thrilling! Alex Gibney and John Sweeney have also retweeted things I wrote. That was thrilling too (god I’m easy).

> [@dasmoocher](#):
>
> They killed Issac Hayes!? Those bastards!

It’s a sad story, but _laugh_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Angel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d26b3c/32.png) [@Johnny\_Angel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Angel)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 5:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/210 "2015-04-06T05:43:20Z")

</div>

I recall reading some stuff, probably from Operation ClamBake, about the church. The thing where they framed a reporter for sending a bomb threat was mentioned in the film and the book, but they didn’t go into the details that I thought were particularly shocking. I had read the actual leaked internal documents detailing the outline of the plot in this frighteningly Orwelian spook-lingo.

The set up as I recall was that they had agents go to a bar where the reporter Paulette Cooper was known to frequent see that she touched a sheet of jokes that had a blank cover page stapled to it. They saw to it that she handled this joke page, and subsequently they took that blank sheet of paper and typewrote a threatening letter with it. Looking on Wikipedia, I see that this was really just a small part of [Operation Freakout](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freakout), but what I had read was a damning and appalling internal order describing this particular insidious trick. That detail really stuck with me.

I also remember reading the saga of one member who apparently knew his LRH (what they called the scripture of the church) backwards and forwards and sent a memo up the food chain when the church started raising money to combat what they were characterizing as religious discrimination. The poor sap just wanted to inform his superiors that they were in violation of LRH because they were not allowed to ask for money without providing goods or services in exchange, and he cited them chapter-and-verse. I have kind of a soft spot for people who really know their stuff, and this guy took the sacredness of LRH quite seriously and seemed to be confused that people were not glad that he was trying to help them avoid falling into error. Eventually he was forced out of the church.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 6:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/211 "2015-04-06T06:11:57Z")

</div>

My friend tried to get me interested in the church, because, I guess, they get trained to do that. Just to be fair, I read _Dianetics_ cover-to-cover. Gawds, what a slog. But it taught me some things (accidentally).

My friend was in a vulnerable space at the time, a bit disillusioned with his life and his prospects, so the church set a good hook. One of the things you (might) get from _Dianetics_ is exactly the same underlying message as homeopathy: your own body/mind can fix itself, real good, all it needs is a tad bit of help. I think that is kind of like playing to the subject’s vanity, which tends to be rather effective.

The other thing I got from the book was a perception of the hypnotic effect of massive verbiage. It was very repetitive, hammering away over and over again on the subject of the Basic-Basic and its origins. After I turned the last page, it struck me that things like sermons and political speeches work in a similar way, attempting to soften up the listener with great flipping wadges of verbiage as a sort of hypnotism, to try to plant the message in deep, fresh loam. But maybe that is just me.

And of course I sat in the mission and let a clam try to drag me in, but all I really remember from that was how it seemed to me like she was shoving her camel-toe in my face the whole time. But that is not exactly unique, other religions try to use sex as a hook as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mona\_Lisa\_Simpson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ce7236/32.png) [@Mona\_Lisa\_Simpson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mona_Lisa_Simpson)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/212 "2015-04-06T16:23:23Z")

</div>

I am sure this is not new information to anyone, but I find Craiglist ads all the time for “bookclubs” that like to discuss self help issues, and how to achieve success. It doesn’t take much reading between the lines to realize they are talking about Scientology. [This](http://vancouver.craigslist.ca/van/grp/4958516027.html) is the current one, but last year there was one that was much more targeted to the lonely, bored, frustrated type of person, who wanted to join a club of other readers, seeking self improvement.

I wonder how successful those ads are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davidm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidm/32/225_2.png) [@davidm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/davidm)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/213 "2015-04-06T16:49:01Z")

</div>

It looks like there are lots of places where those ads are being run, and not just on Craigslist.  
[https://www.google.com/search?q=Do+you+enjoy+going+to+lectures+or+seminars+to+learn+about+life+or+being](https://www.google.com/search?q=Do+you+enjoy+going+to+lectures+or+seminars+to+learn+about+life+or+being)

There’s also a discussion of the ads on [xenu.net](http://xenu.net) from back in 2010 (so they’ve been running the same ad for at least 4 or 5 years) where they’re discussing what is apparently the exact same ad as well as ads targeting the parents of young children with a $100 “children’s communication course”, which is VERY disturbing.  
[http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=33542&p=386609](http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=33542&p=386609)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/214 "2015-04-06T17:34:24Z")

</div>

Does the movie touch at all on the NOTs? I was following a.r.s about a decade ago when there was a big deal about some Swede, Zenon Panoussis as I recall, who put the NOTs text (“New era dianetics for OTs”) online and was getting sued by the church. It was a bit comical, as the church had their people infesting the court house to examine the documents continuously, which had to be placed as evidence, so that no SPs would be able to look at them.

It really pisses me off that they claim this material as “trade secrets”. What the ever-loving? It should be a huge red flag that a religion is engaging in “trade”, that is the province of secular business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davidm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidm/32/225_2.png) [@davidm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/davidm)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/215 "2015-04-06T18:01:22Z")

</div>

They want it both ways. They want the advantages of being recognized as a religion and, at the same time, they want to take advantage of laws meant to protect businesses. Trying to claim “trade secrets” should have resulted in their tax status being reevaluated, in my humble opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 9:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/216 "2015-04-06T21:54:06Z")

</div>

> [@eschereal](#):
>
> Does the movie touch at all on the NOTs? I was following a.r.s about a decade ago when there was a big deal about some Swede, Zenon Panoussis as I recall, who put the NOTs text (“New era dianetics for OTs”) online and was getting sued by the church. It was a bit comical, as the church had their people infesting the court house to examine the documents continuously, which had to be placed as evidence, so that no SPs would be able to look at them.

Not that I recall.

Honestly, one could have a weekly TV series called _The Crimes of Scientology_ and it could run for years.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/217 "2015-04-06T22:08:34Z")

</div>

> [@gaffa](#):
>
> Honestly, one could have a weekly TV series called _The Crimes of Scientology_ and it could run for years.

It would have to, they would not be able to air 3 episodes without months of litigation tying the whole thing up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2015, 11:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/218 "2015-04-06T23:40:16Z")

</div>

> [@eschereal](#):
>
> It would have to, they would not be able to air 3 episodes without months of litigation tying the whole thing up.

Sure, but it would be fun while it lasted. HBO could pull it off.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Equipoise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/equipoise/32/151_2.png) [@Equipoise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Equipoise)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2015, 3:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/219 "2015-04-07T03:47:32Z")

</div>

[On his blog today](http://www.mikerindersblog.org/should-scientology-be-tax-exempt/) Mike Rinder gives a good overview of why Scientology should not be tax extempt.

John Travolta is [happy living in his own little bubble](http://www.tampabay.com/things-to-do/movies/john-travolta-says-hes-happy-with-scientology-wont-see-going-clear/2224359). Scientology works for him, so anything negative they do doesn’t concern him.

Quoting myself regarding the SNL parody:

> [@Equipoise](#):
>
> Here’s the full original of “We Stand Tall,” of which only a tiny part is used in Going Clear. It must be watched at least once to get the full impact of the parody, especially those black & white videos of Hubbard. Get your barf bags, wet wipes & mouthwash and have fun!
> 
> [http://youtu.be/XyNh1j3dsp8](http://youtu.be/XyNh1j3dsp8)
> 
> I’m waiting for someone to do a freeze-frame with some updates, like in the SNL video. There are at least 3 high-ranking hard-core members who are now hard-core critics prominently featured in the video: Mike Rinder, Mark “Marty” Rathbun and Amy Scobee.

Someone put this picture on Twitter. It shows some of the people in the “We Stand Tall” video and their current status, as known or believed by the person who made it (I don’t know who that is):

[![](https://i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b595/xenussister/WhereAreTheyNow_zpsuli1lmrv.jpg) ](https://i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b595/xenussister/WhereAreTheyNow_zpsuli1lmrv.jpg)

It’s not big, so not that easy to read, so I blew it up bigger and wrote out what it said for each.

1. Shelly Miscavige  
Wife of David Miscavige  
Current location unknown

2. Ray Mithoff  
Former Inspector General for Tech, RTC  
Believed imprisoned at Gold

3. Mark Yager  
Former Inspector General for Admin, RTC  
Believed imprisoned at Gold

4. Mark Ingber  
Former Commanding Officer of the CMO  
Believed imprisoned at Gold

5. Mike Rinder  
Former Commanding Officer of the Office of Special Affairs  
Fled the cult in 2007

6. David Miscavige  
International leader of the Church of Scientology

7. Heber Jentzsch  
Former President, Church of Scientology International  
Believed imprisoned at Gold

8. Greg Wilhere  
Inspector General  
Reportedly still working with David Miscavige

9. Mark Rathbun  
Former Inspector General for Ethics RTC  
Escaped the cult in 2004

10. Guillaume Lesevre  
Former Inspector General Int  
Believed imprisoned at Gold

I didn’t add any other text, but I could have. For instance, [Shelly Miscavige](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Miscavige) has not been seen in public since 2007. [A Tony Ortega blog](http://tonyortega.org/2013/07/17/shelly-speaks-scientology-leaders-banished-wife-says-shell-get-out-only-one-way/) from 2013 is a pretty good overview of information to that point.

[Heber Jentzsch](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heber_Jentzsch) hasn’t been seen in public since 2004, though he did attend a private memorial for his son in 2012. There’s a [“Free Heber” page](http://www.freeheber.com/), which includes [Mike Rinder’s writing](http://www.freeheber.com/index.php?title=Where_is_Heber) that the last time he saw him, Jentzsch was in The Hole. The last time Jentzsch spoke to anyone was in 2009, when he told his brother in a telephone call [“I’ll never get out of here alive.”](http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/07/scientology_david_jentzsch_heber.php) Oh yeah, and that [memorial service Jentzsch attended](http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/07/scientology_alexander_jentzsch_stan_gerson.php) for his 27-year old son Alexander who had just died? Alexander’s mother Karen de la Carriere was not only not allowed to attend, she wasn’t even told about it. They were Disconnected because she was no longer in the cult, according to Scientology’s odious and toxic policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![malaka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ecc23a/32.png) [@malaka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/malaka)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2015, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259/220 "2015-04-07T18:00:41Z")

</div>

> [@gaffa](#):
>
> As I said earlier, the best part was Paul Haggis explaining how an intelligent, rational person could get sucked in.

This part stuck out to me. I’m not sure that the words “intelligent” or “rational” are being used properly.

Hubbard was insane. Miscavige is evil. Still, their charisma managed to get thousands of weak-minded and -willed folks to follow along.

Another (paraphrased) quote near the end had me thinking: "…I willfully chose to believe in Scientology because the alternative was too painful.”

What alternative?

First, I think that having a “crisis of faith” (questioning your religious/political/professional/whatever beliefs) can be an incredibly painful journey. A journey that many choose to abandon because it is simply too painful.

Second is the idea that there is no “larger, deeper meaning”. For many, the thought that they’ll never see grandma again is incredibly painful.

And since most folks want to avoid pain, it leads them towards these types of beliefs.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-clear-alex-gibneys-new-documentary-about-scientology/716259.md?page=12)
