# "Going Postal"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [March 9, 2007, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242 "2007-03-09T14:03:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2007, 6:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/21 "2007-03-11T06:28:24Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=GGeerIII]  
Secondly, the two studies quoted about murder in the workplace are totally off base. “Going postal” is being murdered by coworkers, not random people off the street. Taxi drivers and chauffeurs having the highest mortality rate doesn’t mean squat as an answer unless they were killed by other taxi drivers and chauffeurs.  
[/QUOTE]

That’s rather like saying people named “Dave” are the most murderous, once you discount all the murders committed by people not named Dave.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dougie\_monty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/439d5e/32.png) [@dougie\_monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dougie_monty)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2007, 7:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/22 "2007-03-11T07:03:24Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]  
That’s rather like saying people named “Dave” are the most murderous, once you discount all the murders committed by people not named Dave.  
[/QUOTE]

Ah, but how many taxi drivers and chauffeurs have gone on murder rampages (and I don’t mean necessarily using the vehicle as a murder weapon)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2007, 8:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/23 "2007-03-11T08:14:38Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=WhyNot]  
I’m mostly shocked and dismayed that The Perfect Master needed to use the Edit feature.  
[/QUOTE]  
😃 😃 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2007, 10:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/24 "2007-03-11T10:20:50Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=dougie\_monty]  
Ah, but how many taxi drivers and chauffeurs have gone on murder rampages (and I don’t mean necessarily using the vehicle as a murder weapon)?  
[/QUOTE]

Few, I expect, but among people killed in the workplace under _any_ circumstances, taxi drivers beat postal workers by a mile. The OP is biasing his results by picking the sample he wants. He even interprets it favourably without justification, i.e. there’s no reason to assume all of the three to four murders annually among postal workers are the result of someone “going postal”, i.e. on a wild killing spree. Sometimes it’s just Carrier A clubbing Carrier B because B was sleeping with A’s wife.

I’m kinda curious how many postal workers get fatally hit by cars while on their route. It wouldn’t surprise me if the number rivalled or exceeded homicides.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BJMoose](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/5fc32e/32.png) [@BJMoose](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BJMoose)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2007, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/25 "2007-03-11T18:00:46Z")

</div>

I understand what **Cecil** is saying about the low numbers problem, but the OP is right to question the value of the studies cited for the question at hand. What we needed was a study of worker-on-worker/employee violence. Including law enforcement officers whose job puts them at risk, and victims of murders that were “incidential” the the primary crime - robbing a hack or store clerk - really skews what data there is.

Reminds me of a newspaper article several years back where Wichita’s preeminent local historian was asked to compare the town’s cattle-town-days murders with the present. He pointed out that there were four murders in the first few years of the town’s history, compared with today, where we typically have about fifty murders per year. Well, he overlooked the difference in population (twelve to a couple of thousand in the beginning, 300,000 today) and thus the huge difference in murder _rate_. (I know from my own research that he also missed a murder occuring a few months before the first local newspaper began publication, but that’s another matter.)  
Course, we’ve known since Melville’s _Bartleby the Scrivner_ that working at a post office will mess with one’s mind. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RustyP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/34f0e0/32.png) [@RustyP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RustyP)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2007, 6:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/26 "2007-03-11T18:21:01Z")

</div>

Looking back at the original question, it doesn’t ask about murder or deaths. It asks about violence by coworkers.

While you might be able to get some idea if you check injury statistics (OSHA for non-governmental employers, the governmental agencies themselves for governmental agencies) you might get a clue – assuming that you took the time to look deep enough to judge whether the injuries were in fact on-purpose, and not accidents.

And that doesn’t even count the number of times that violence insured, and wasn’t recorded as an injury.

Workplace violence does’t just include murder. It’s a vague concept, but I would suggest that any act that would qualify as an assault or battery, whether or not charges are actually filed, and whether or not injuries are reported, qualifies as workplace violence.

And as someone else pointed out, just because it’s between people who are coworkers doesn’t mean it’s work related. If you punch your coworker in the face because you caught him cheating with your wife, that’s not workplace violence in my book.

Nor does workplace violence have to happen at the workplace. If someone drives to their boss’ house, and kicks his ass there for something that happened at work, that’s still workplace violence in my book.

To me, “going postal” means someone reacted in a violent, physical way against a coworker or coworkers (including bosses!) because of something work-related. Murdering a coworker is just the most extreem case of “going postal”, but it’s not the only way “going postal” manifests itself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lust4Life](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecc23a/32.png) [@Lust4Life](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lust4Life)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 9:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/27 "2007-03-12T09:07:58Z")

</div>

Its anecdotal at best ,no cite,but I’m sure I read somewhere that there was a high incidence of violence amongst staff in restaraunt kitchens on hot days in premises that had higher temperatures as the norm all year round.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dougie\_monty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/439d5e/32.png) [@dougie\_monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dougie_monty)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 9:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/28 "2007-03-12T09:48:42Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]  
I’m kinda curious how many postal workers get fatally hit by cars while on their route. It wouldn’t surprise me if the number rivalled or exceeded homicides.  
[/QUOTE]

This is more an indictment of speed- and power-crazed drivers than anyone in a workplace. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmclaughlin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/bc8723/32.png) [@pmclaughlin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pmclaughlin)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 4:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/29 "2007-03-12T16:30:19Z")

</div>

A few of the posts point out the major problem with this column: It does not address the original question. “Going postal” refers to violence against co-workers (or, ex-co-workers), not the general threat of violence in the workplace. This is the first time I have ever seen an answer by TPM to be so off base. The comments and stats regarding taxi drivers and cops have no relevance to the specific question at hand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/30 "2007-03-12T16:55:58Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=pmclaughlin]  
A few of the posts point out the major problem with this column: It does not address the original question.  
[/quote]

Sure, it does. It cites several violent postal-related incidents and gives some stats, then goes on to put the issue in perspective; although “going postal” has becomes a popular meme, they remain a fairly rare occurrence and a small fraction of work-related deaths overall.

What “address” to the original question would you have expected? Summaries of every incident until he reaches 600 words?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RustyP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/34f0e0/32.png) [@RustyP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RustyP)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 5:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/31 "2007-03-12T17:43:48Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]  
Sure, it does. It cites several violent postal-related incidents and gives some stats, then goes on to put the issue in perspective; although “going postal” has becomes a popular meme, they remain a fairly rare occurrence and a small fraction of work-related deaths overall.

What “address” to the original question would you have expected? Summaries of every incident until he reaches 600 words?  
[/QUOTE]

The original question was: “Is it true U.S. Postal Service workers are more likely than other occupations to “go postal” on coworkers?”

So it depends on how you define “going postal”. Does violence that doesn’t result in death not meet the definition of “going postal”?

The title of the article was: “Are employees of the United States Postal Service more likely to be violent towards coworkers?”

So the actual question was reframed in a way that would suggest that “going postal” equals being “violent towards coworkers”, and not just killing coworkers. But then the body of the answer side-steps this, and addresses only homicide by coworker.

So perhaps we first need to stop and define just what “going postal” means. And I would suggest that the more general idea that includes all co-worker on co-worker, workplace related violence is a more valid definition of “going postal”, as the article’s title suggests. Perhaps some people much more narrowly define “going postal” as only being those cases when a co-worker kills other co-workers, but if we’re going to narrow the definition that much, that needs to be stated, and the article needs a more appropriate title.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedSwinglineOne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a9adbd/32.png) [@RedSwinglineOne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RedSwinglineOne)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/32 "2007-03-12T17:46:22Z")

</div>

[FROM SEINFELD](http://www.tv.com/seinfeld/the-old-man/episode/2298/summary.html) George: Let me ask you something… What do you do for a living, Newman?  
Newman: I’m a United States postal worker.  
George: Aren’t those the guys that always go crazy and come back with a gun and shoot everybody?  
Newman: Sometimes.  
Jerry: Why is that?  
Newman: Because the mail never stops. It just keeps coming and coming and coming. There’s never a letup, It’s relentless. Every day it piles up more and more, but the more you get out, the more it keeps coming. And then the bar code reader breaks. And then it’s Publisher’s Clearinghouse day.  
Jerry: All right, all right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/33 "2007-03-12T17:47:20Z")

</div>

Okay, Rusty. Why don’t _you_ write 600 words on it and we’ll have a debate on which essay is the more entertaining and informative.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RustyP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/34f0e0/32.png) [@RustyP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RustyP)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/34 "2007-03-12T19:24:06Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]  
Okay, Rusty. Why don’t _you_ write 600 words on it and we’ll have a debate on which essay is the more entertaining and informative.  
[/QUOTE]

Why? Because I disagreed with you? Has the discussion really already degraded to taunting?

My point isn’t that I could do a better job. My point is that the term “going postal” was framed one way in the article title, and framed another way in the answer to the question. I did not assert that the answer wasn’t entetaining or informative, nor did I assert that I could do a better job. I simply disagreed with your assertation that the answer addressed the question.

If you disagree with me, I’d appreciate it if you could support your opinion with something other than an unrelated taunt.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/35 "2007-03-12T20:49:52Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=RustyP]  
Why? Because I disagreed with you? Has the discussion really already degraded to taunting?  
[/quote]  
Taunting? Hardly. It’s a serious invitation for you to share what _you_ think would have been a relevant on-point answer to the question given to Cecil Adams. I see claims that CA did a bad job, with no indication of what criteria would identify a _good_ job.

> [@](#):
>
> If you disagree with me, I’d appreciate it if you could support your opinion with something other than an unrelated taunt.

I already have:

> [@me](#):
>
> [The column] cites several violent postal-related incidents and gives some stats, then goes on to put the issue in perspective; although “going postal” has becomes a popular meme, they remain a fairly rare occurrence and a small fraction of work-related deaths overall.

If the answer to a question about “going postal” can’t include data on how common it really is and how it compares to other workplace slayings, then I guess we _do_ have to agree to disagree. The mistake is to call what I’m doing “taunting” as though I had some motive to attack you personally. I don’t even know you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Raguleader](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/258eb7/32.png) [@Raguleader](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Raguleader)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2007, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/36 "2007-03-12T21:01:23Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=EvilAsh]  
I dunno. I’m a postal worker, and while I do not like either my job or the postal organization for reasons I will not get into now, I feel that the “Going Postal” phrase is unfair. I believe that the 1986 Oklahoma incident is akin to the Columbine school shootings in Colorado, horrific and well-publicized, but in many ways an anomaly.

Five years later, in 1991, you have two incidents within one month of each other, which further cemented in the minds of people that we are all a bunch of gun-toting crazies (when in truth, only some of us are 😉 ). Shortly after that, the paper coined that lovely term and the rest is history.

To relate it again back to school violence; I don’t believe schools are inherently anymore dangerous today. Rather, I think that people are hyper-sensitive about _every little incident._ The same can be said of the PO; the next incident of violence may be twenty years away, but as soon as it happens people will say “There they go again.” :rolleyes:

Oh, and let me be the first to say: Welcome to the boards! Enjoy your stay! 🙂  
[/QUOTE]

Indeed, anyone who has done any research knows that the vast majority of postal workers are merely junk mail toting crazies, who commit their lives to the delivery of the mail and the ongoing battle with the Polar Bears. 😃

As far as school violence goes, from what I understand, the year of the Columbine shootings was also the year with the lowest incidence of school violence, as it turns out.

And has anyone considered that postal worker shootings may in fact be caused DIRECTLY by violence depicted in things delivered by mail? Take, for instance, that Tom Clancy book you ordered from [Amazon.com](http://Amazon.com)! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![awldune](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c77e96/32.png) [@awldune](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/awldune)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2007, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/37 "2007-03-15T21:23:32Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]  
I see claims that CA did a bad job, with no indication of what criteria would identify a _good_ job.  
[/QUOTE]

What we’d like to know is whether postal workers are more likely to murder a co-worker. Specifically, I’d love to see the numbers compared to the national average and to the closest runner-up (or leader).

For anyone who is interested, the USPS report cited can be found here: [http://www.casacolumbia.org/Absolutenm/articlefiles/33994.pdf](http://www.casacolumbia.org/Absolutenm/articlefiles/33994.pdf)

This report claims that:

> [@](#):
>
> It is impossible to compare with any precision the likelihood of a postal employee being killed by a coworker or a non-coworker with that of an employee in the national workforce. We know that from 1992 through 1998, nine of the 16 postal victims were killed by current or former coworkers. Unfortunately, we cannot identify the perpetrator’s status in nearly half (46 percent) of all workplace homicides. Unsolved crimes likely explain much of the missing information (31 percent of all murders in 1998 were unsolved), while some may be due to  
> limitations of national data collection procedures.

Seems like a cop-out to me. I’d like to know how things compare in the 54% of cases where they can tell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2007, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/38 "2007-03-15T22:28:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=awldune]  
What we’d like to know is whether postal workers are more likely to murder a co-worker. Specifically, I’d love to see the numbers compared to the national average and to the closest runner-up (or leader).

…

Seems like a cop-out to me. I’d like to know how things compare in the 54% of cases where they can tell.  
[/QUOTE]

You can’t make a meaningful statement with a sample size of only 16. Samples of at least 30 or 40 are considered barely accurate and samples of at least several hundred are needed for significant accuracy. You’re demanding Cecil make a definitive statement but the information just isn’t there. It’s like looking at a baseball team’s performance over a two-week period, insisting someone predict their standing at the end of the season and being disappointed when they can’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![awldune](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c77e96/32.png) [@awldune](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/awldune)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2007, 2:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/39 "2007-03-16T14:04:55Z")

</div>

FWIW, I was saying the USPS was copping out, not Cecil. None of us are in a position to make demands of TPM.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2007, 2:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242/40 "2007-03-17T14:29:37Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=awldune]  
FWIW, I was saying the USPS was copping out, not Cecil. None of us are in a position to make demands of TPM.  
[/QUOTE]

I demanded that he provide me the recipe for a perfect Margarita, but he never came through. I figure anyone is in a position to demand such a recipe from anyone who is Perfect. 😛

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/going-postal/395242.md?page=1)
