# Good and Bad Movies Titles

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [July 11, 2013, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226 "2013-07-11T14:30:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 12:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/61 "2013-07-12T12:59:07Z")

</div>

> [@Krokodil](#):
>
> **Serenity** –great movie with a bad name.

I’d classify the movie as “good” but that’s a pretty excellent example. The movie was a bomb in part because the title told the audience nothing. Technically it meets Requirement 3 in that it has a reference to a source material, but even that’s half assed, since it’s the name of the vessel, not the show, and the show wasn’t very popular.

Also mentioned and a classic example is “Cloverfield.”

Of course, a movie CAN overcome a bad title, if the movie itself is so amazing that the title becomes its own thing. Apocalypse Now, The French Connection, Schindler’s List (which, granted, is a better title than the source material’s title, Schindler’s Ark) and Rain Man are all mediocre titles but you don’t think of that anymore because they were movies that made their own reputation.

To my mind the best-named movie of all time is **Aliens.** Sums it up, refers to the original movie, tells anyone who saw the original what they’re in for, and rather than just calling it “Alien 2” is an unusual and clever title for a sequel.

Bad movies with good titles abound, of course:

The Smurfs - Obviously connection to popular source material  
Hop - Thematic, catchy, clever.  
8 Heads In a Duffel Bag - Funny, catchy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/62 "2013-07-12T13:21:21Z")

</div>

From 2012:

Bad titles: Argo, Brave, Prometheus, Silver Linings Playbook, Skyfall, Ted, Zero Dark Thirty  
Uncertain: Django Unchained  
Good: The Dark Knight Rises, Hotel Transylvania, Wrath of the Titans

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YogSothoth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/8edcca/32.png) [@YogSothoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/YogSothoth)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/63 "2013-07-12T16:49:47Z")

</div>

> [@Telemark](#):
>
> I always liked the full title of **Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb**

I have to admit that I STILL don’t know what this movie is about. All I know is it has something to do with nukes and is a comedy of some type

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YogSothoth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/8edcca/32.png) [@YogSothoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/YogSothoth)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 5:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/64 "2013-07-12T17:03:47Z")

</div>

> [@tullsterx](#):
>
> I just hate titles that contain a characters name with a twist. . . but, dang I can’t think of a good example. . . Like the movie will be called “Take it to Hart” and it’s about a guy named Jimmy Hart that’s searching for love. Stuff like that.

> [@JKellyMap](#):
>
> You might have been thinking of _Good Will Hunting_. Agreed. Indeed, I’d go as far as to say that the title is the only bad thing about that movie.

Or “Knight and Day”. Gah, that title alone was a turn off

> [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](#):
>
> Disney’s putting more thought to this than they used to: they released _Tangled_, not _Rapunzel_, and, coming this winter, _Frozen_, not _The Snow Queen_. In both cases the idea is supposedly to attract boys who might not be interested in a “Disney princess” movie.

I think companies are totally overthinking this. Kids are not going to ask mom and day to see a random movie they know nothing about. As such, a non-descriptive title doesn’t seem like as much of a detriment than an adult oriented movie. How many kids walked into the theater knowing nothing except the title to that movie? I’m sure they all knew it was about a girl with long hair and a prince and a talking horse

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlsoNamedBort](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alsonamedbort/32/3213_2.png) [@AlsoNamedBort](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AlsoNamedBort)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 5:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/65 "2013-07-12T17:08:43Z")

</div>

> [@YogSosoth](#):
>
> I think companies are totally overthinking this. Kids are not going to ask mom and day to see a random movie they know nothing about. As such, a non-descriptive title doesn’t seem like as much of a detriment than an adult oriented movie. How many kids walked into the theater knowing nothing except the title to that movie? I’m sure they all knew it was about a girl with long hair and a prince and a talking horse

Honestly, how many adults are really going to see a movie just knowing the title? Bad titles might not attract attention, but I’m not going to a movie blind just going “Well, it sounds interesting from just the title.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Amateur\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/59ef9b/32.png) [@Amateur\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Amateur_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/66 "2013-07-12T17:11:03Z")

</div>

> [@Krokodil](#):
>
> **Quackser Fortune Has a Cousin in the Bronx** –What were they thinking? “If we build it, they will come”? I hear it was a great film, but I’ll never know for sure.

I am indecently proud of having seen this very unusual movie in the first run.

“Ah, ye have such lovely hands, Quackser…”

But yes, it’s one of the stranger movie titles I can think of. It is absolutely literal, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/67 "2013-07-12T17:34:10Z")

</div>

**Sharknado** was on last night. You knew what you were in for from the title, and it delivered exactly that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YogSothoth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/8edcca/32.png) [@YogSothoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/YogSothoth)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/68 "2013-07-12T18:17:32Z")

</div>

> [@AlsoNamedBort](#):
>
> Honestly, how many adults are really going to see a movie just knowing the title? Bad titles might not attract attention, but I’m not going to a movie blind just going “Well, it sounds interesting from just the title.”

Apparently, and I didn’t know this, there are a number of adults who have told me they simply want to see a movie and go to the theaters to see what’s playing. For them, the titles are about the only thing they go by. I hear that and think its the exact opposite with kids, who find a movie they want to watch no matter the title and beg their parents to take them. That’s why I think a bad title for a kids movie doesn’t matter

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KneadToKnow](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kneadtoknow/32/3999_2.png) [@KneadToKnow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KneadToKnow)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/69 "2013-07-12T18:34:27Z")

</div>

I thought _8 Heads in a Duffel Bag_ pretty much nailed it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SecretaryofEvil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e95f7d/32.png) [@SecretaryofEvil](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SecretaryofEvil)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2013, 5:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/70 "2013-07-15T17:48:59Z")

</div>

**A Clockwork Orange** is a title I always liked.

I can think of two TV show titles that instantly spring to mind.

**Don’t Trust the Bitch in Apartment 23** was a very funny show with a very bad title. It’s too long, and they actually had to censor it in advertisements and even in the show’s opening credits.

**Game of Thrones** is an excellent title for the show. Much better than **A Song of Ice and Fire,** which always reminds me of the band **Earth, Win & Fire.** To derail even farther into book titles, **A Game of Thrones** , \*\*A Clash of Kings \*\*and **A Storm of Swords** are all pretty good book titles.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2013, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/71 "2013-07-15T19:49:52Z")

</div>

> [@Justin\_Bailey](#):
>
> The really terrible thing about Unknown as a title is that another Unknown was released just a few years earlier.
> 
> [Unknown (2006) - IMDb](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0450340)

I did not know that.\</Carson\>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Accidental\_Martyr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ce7236/32.png) [@Accidental\_Martyr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Accidental_Martyr)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2013, 8:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/72 "2013-07-15T20:23:31Z")

</div>

I always thought **Space Cowboys** was a really stupid title.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeke\_N.Destroi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/4af34b/32.png) [@Zeke\_N.Destroi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeke_N.Destroi)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2013, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/73 "2013-07-15T20:56:06Z")

</div>

> [@tullsterx](#):
>
> I just hate titles that contain a characters name with a twist. . . but, dang I can’t think of a good example. . . Like the movie will be called “Take it to Hart” and it’s about a guy named Jimmy Hart that’s searching for love. Stuff like that.

First thing I thought of was Lucky Number Slevin (like the title and love the movie). In French speaking areas - I have heard - they just called it Slevin because the pun didn’t work.

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> Just FYI, “Johnny Got His Gun” is a play on some lyrics from the WW1 George M. Cohan song “Over There”.

Thanks for this. Excellent book and one of the few movies that have stayed with me for years afterward.

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> Speaking of sorceror, _Harry Potter and the Sorceror’s Stone_ was an absolutely horrible and meaningless title change _for me_ for the American book and movie. “Sorceror’s Stone” means diddly squat to me. “Philosopher’s Stone” makes more sense.

snip

The title was changed for American audiences because it was felt that they wouldn’t know what the Philosopher’s Stone was.

Everyone who didn’t know that raise your hands… no one huh?

Good Titles:  
Die Hard  
Goodfellas  
Who Is Harry Kellerman and Why Is He Saying Those Terrible Things About Me?

Bad Titles  
First Knight  
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (great line but utterly misused here)  
Breakin’ 2: Electric Boogaloo  
Blade Runner (excellent film though)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2013, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/74 "2013-07-15T23:24:39Z")

</div>

> [@Accidental\_Martyr](#):
>
> I always thought **Space Cowboys** was a really stupid title.

I just wish they had made the _Gangsters of Love_ sequel.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MaxTheVool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MaxTheVool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MaxTheVool)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2013, 12:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/75 "2013-07-16T00:51:48Z")

</div>

It bugs me when people complain about the re-titling of Harry Potter. Hindsight being 20/20, we know that it was a massively gigantic hit that pretty much single-handledly cured childhood illiteracy, made infinity money, etc. But at the time, it was just a book that was maybe kinda popular in England. No one ever quite knows what makes something a huge hit, but it certainly has something to do with something achieving some kind of critical mass and then ballooning from there via word of mouth, etc.

Might it be the case that if HP had kept its original title, it would have been a flop or a minor success at best? Certainly. And sure, everyone reading this thread on this message board has heard of the philosopher’s stone… but we’re a very specifically self-selected group of people not at all necessarily representative of the populace as a whole.

I think that it was an entirely reasonable decision, given the information available at the time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Jeffrey\_Lebowski](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_jeffrey_lebowski/32/215_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Jeffrey\_Lebowski](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Jeffrey_Lebowski)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2013, 6:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/76 "2013-07-16T06:39:42Z")

</div>

Went to Coney Island on a Mission from God… Be Back by Five

That title stings my eyes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![buddha\_david](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ee7513/32.png) [@buddha\_david](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/buddha_david)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2013, 9:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/77 "2013-07-16T09:47:01Z")

</div>

**To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar**

I actually turned down an invitation to see **Argo** because I thought it was some generic animated kids’ flick. On the other hand, **Zero Dark Thirty** was a great title – sounds dark and suspenseful, and it gives you an idea of what the movie is like even if you don’t know what it’s about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vontsira](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/51bf81/32.png) [@vontsira](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vontsira)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2013, 12:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/78 "2013-07-16T12:09:28Z")

</div>

A title which I find annoyingly feeble and non-attention-catching, is “The Train” (the one about the fleeing Nazis trying to make off out of Paris, with numerous priceless paintings). My irritation is I think in some way, connected with my being a railfan; and more generally: the individual train concerned, is one for a unique purpose, in a highly unusual situation – re all of which, I feel that the title tells one absolutely zero. If it’s meant to sound gritty and blunt – to me, it just seems weak and “nothing”.

In mitigation: at the time of the film’s release (mid-1960s), I gather that there was a big vogue for making films with similarly laconic titles: “The [‘whatever’]” – with the second word preferably a monosyllable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2013, 12:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/79 "2013-07-16T12:51:40Z")

</div>

Upcoming movies:

Good title: Cockneys vs. Zombies

Bad titles: Our Children, The Artist and the Model, We’re the Millers

Uncertain: Jug Face (The plot centers on a demonic power worshiped by an isolated rural community that offers health and protection in exchange for human sacrifices, identified when **their faces materialize on ceramic jugs**. Bloody chaos ensues when the newest victim is hidden from the monster.) Not one I’m going to see, but the name is accurately descriptive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anaamika](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Anaamika](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anaamika)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2013, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226/80 "2013-07-16T14:06:24Z")

</div>

> [@Mrs.Cake](#):
>
> I love the movie _Ronin_, but you could be excused for thinking it was a film about rogue samurai. _It’s Not About the Fucking Suitcase, Dammit_ might have been more descriptive, but probably not a great marketing choice either.

You made me snicker out loud at the office. Your title would have been perfect.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-and-bad-movies-titles/663226.md?page=5)
