# Good source of news?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [October 30, 2015, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197 "2015-10-30T19:13:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inigo\_Montoya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inigo_montoya/32/124_2.png) [@Inigo\_Montoya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inigo_Montoya)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2015, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/1 "2015-10-30T19:13:46Z")

</div>

I don’t get much time to catch up on the news. **FOX** has been too dishonest for too long I wouldn’t be able to believe them if they reported the sun rose in the east. **CNN** doesn’t seem to have the same credibility issues, but their website is heavy with commercials and celebrity fluff.

So where would one look for a news source with reasonably neutral reporting on US politics, economics, and world-wide scientific developments. Maybe the occasional fluff piece that still does not bump important developments off the front page? To be honest, I tend to come HERE first and catch whiffs of major events whereon I might investigate further.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Suburban\_Plankton](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/suburban_plankton/32/219_2.png) [@Suburban\_Plankton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Suburban_Plankton)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2015, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/2 "2015-10-30T19:21:55Z")

</div>

I tend to get most of my news from here on the Dope. If I’m looking for something a bit more ‘official’, I usually turn to either the [BBC](http://www.bbc.com/) or [Al Jazeera](http://www.aljazeera.com/).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DoggyDunnit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/5fc32e/32.png) [@DoggyDunnit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DoggyDunnit)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2015, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/3 "2015-10-30T20:14:05Z")

</div>

The [BBC](http://www.bbc.com/).

[Aljazeera America](http://america.aljazeera.com/).

[teleSUR English](http://www.telesurtv.net/english/).

[NPR](http://www.npr.org/).

[Democracy Now](http://www.democracynow.org/).

[Deutsche Welle](http://www.dw.com/en/top-stories/s-9097).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DinoR](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dinor/32/2821_2.png) [@DinoR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DinoR)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2015, 9:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/4 "2015-10-30T21:07:15Z")

</div>

[Reuters](http://www.reuters.com/)  
[BBC - US and Canada](http://www.bbc.com/news/world/us_and_canada)  
[Christian Science Monitor](http://www.csmonitor.com/)  
[Stratfor](https://www.stratfor.com/) - for analysis, a lot of it is behind a subscription paywall but trained former government/military intelligence analysts working from open sources can produce some amazing product  
[The Economist](http://www.economist.com/) - good analysis and a deeper dive than more timely sources

Al-Jazeera gets some looks if I am focused on the middle east.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2015, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/5 "2015-10-31T05:17:11Z")

</div>

> [@The Great Sun Jester](#):
>
> So where would one look for a news source with reasonably neutral reporting on US politics, economics, and world-wide scientific developments. Maybe the occasional fluff piece that still does not bump important developments off the front page? To be honest, **I tend to come HERE first and catch whiffs of major events whereon I might investigate further**.

Well, you’ve answered your own question!

In general, the news aggregators like Yahoo and Google News and others are good for one specific reason: They gather articles from all over, and you can pick through them and get a good selection of news on many topics from many sources, national and international. True, a lot of them focus way too much on cruft like sports and celebs and clickbait, but one can ignore all that. Once you click on any article, that will then usually have a sidebar with more links to other articles.

I’ll often click on any article even if I’m not interested in what the headline says, just to get to an article on an outside site like Wall Street Journal or Washington Post or Christian Science Monitor or Al-Jazeera or any number of others. Of course, I have a lot of news sites bookmarked too. The point is, that Yahoo and Google and the like give me a smörgåsbord of pickings from all over the place, and I can news-web-surf to my heart’s content starting there.

And yes, I also get all the news I need, and starting points for more readings, right here on the SDMB. (Mumble mumble **aceplace57** mumble mumble. 😃 )

ETA:

> [@The Great Sun Jester](#):
>
> **FOX** has been too dishonest for too long I wouldn’t be able to believe them if they reported the sun rose in the east.

As a matter of fact, the sun _does_ rise in the east. That’s probably why Fox has never mentioned it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2015, 5:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/6 "2015-10-31T05:23:22Z")

</div>

Many good sites are behind paywalls. Although there are sometimes very simple workarounds for those, you might look at [the website for The Guardian newspaper](http://www.theguardian.com), which does not have a paywall and is, I think, a respected newspaper.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2015, 6:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/7 "2015-10-31T06:57:03Z")

</div>

Just read the _New York Times_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bb49](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b38774/32.png) [@bb49](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bb49)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2015, 4:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/8 "2015-11-02T04:58:53Z")

</div>

If you want escapism, how about the Daily News?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![usedtobe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ec9cab/32.png) [@usedtobe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/usedtobe)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2015, 5:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/9 "2015-11-02T05:08:22Z")

</div>

Another vote for BBC.

I set my ‘homepage’ to news dot google dot

Works well enough for road work…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mudshark](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f04885/32.png) [@Mudshark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mudshark)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2015, 5:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/10 "2015-11-02T05:11:30Z")

</div>

Local AM radio. Or on here. Occasionally the BBC.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Absolute](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b2d939/32.png) [@Absolute](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Absolute)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2015, 5:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/11 "2015-11-02T05:31:17Z")

</div>

I check the Wall Street Journal and New York Times websites multiple times each day to stay up to date on breaking news. I read the Economist for a broader perspective. I find this gives excellent coverage of any important developments of general interest. All of them cost money though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ITR\_champion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/c67d28/32.png) [@ITR\_champion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ITR_champion)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2015, 6:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/good-source-of-news/736197/12 "2015-11-02T06:21:36Z")

</div>

I’d say The Economist is definitely number one for thorough, unbiased reporting of current events. I also enjoy the fact that their reporting is truly worldwide, paying equal attention to all parts of the earth. That’s definitely not true for American magainzes, newspapers, or TV networks generally.
