# GOP still trending to win Senate

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [August 13, 2014, 10:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426 "2014-08-13T10:52:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 4:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/181 "2014-08-22T04:46:25Z")

</div>

Another mistake McConnell is poised to make, assuming he’s not just lying to the rubes, is focusing on Obama. What’s the point? Pitchers don’t throw at .220 hitters. Forget about him. Just pass popular shit and if he signs it, great, if he vetoes, hang it on Hillary’s head and the heads of the 2016 senate Democratic candidates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 11:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/182 "2014-08-22T11:08:01Z")

</div>

> [@DigitalC](#):
>
> It’s not self harm for about half of us.

A lot of that half has been fooled into thinking that, but the actual fraction that clearly benefits is much smaller.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 11:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/183 "2014-08-22T11:11:22Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Save it. I’ll be sipping champagne.

That’s analogous - voting Republican suggests an addiction to self-harm.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 11:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/184 "2014-08-22T11:14:42Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> That’s analogous - voting Republican suggests an addiction to self-harm.

Batting 0 for 2. Neither sipping champagne nor voting Republican is fairly described as “self-harm.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 1:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/185 "2014-08-22T13:37:55Z")

</div>

Personally, I’m opposed (not to the point of calling for laws, mind you) generally to things that make you stupid, including drugs, alcohol, creationism (religion overall, pretty much) and voting for people who are trying to use fear as a motivator, which is basically the Republicans since 1996 or so, arguably since the rise of the Christian Right circa 1975.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 1:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/186 "2014-08-22T13:57:46Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Personally, I’m opposed (not to the point of calling for laws, mind you) generally to things that make you stupid, including drugs, alcohol, creationism (religion overall, pretty much) and voting for people who are trying to use fear as a motivator, which is basically the Republicans since 1996 or so, arguably since the rise of the Christian Right circa 1975.

> [@](#):
>
> It’s safe to say that alcohol is both a tonic and a poison. The difference lies mostly in the dose. Moderate drinking seems to be good for the heart and circulatory system, and probably protects against type 2 diabetes and gallstones. Heavy drinking is a major cause of preventable death in most countries.

From [here.](http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/alcohol-full-story/)

And from a peer-reviewed publication, [Moderate alcohol consumption and coronary heart disease: a review](http://pmj.bmj.com/content/77/914/747.full):

> [@](#):
>
> Moderate alcohol consumption, regardless of beverage type, reduces risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) among men and older women.
> 
> There is strong evidence to support that ethanol, the main constituent in alcoholic beverages, is causally related to lower risk of CHD through changes in lipids and haemostatic factors.  
> .  
> .  
> .  
> Although the risks substantially outweigh the benefits for heavy consumption, the burden of coronary heart disease (CHD) has tipped the scale in favour of moderate alcohol consumption for overall health. In the US and many westernised countries, CHD is the leading cause of mortality. It has been estimated that if moderate alcohol consumption lowered risk by even 25%, more deaths could hypothetically be prevented than caused by this exposure in westernised countries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 2:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/187 "2014-08-22T14:42:15Z")

</div>

Thanks for the dietary info. In any event, the U.S. has an opportunity to do itself some fairly significant and lasting harm. It’ll have my pity if it allows fear and the greed of those who exploit fear to manipulate them into it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/188 "2014-08-22T15:39:26Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Thanks for the dietary info. In any event, the U.S. has an opportunity to do itself some fairly significant and lasting harm. It’ll have my pity if it allows fear and the greed of those who exploit fear to manipulate them into it.

You’re welcome. Do you now concede that sipping champagne is not a phrase that suggests self-harm?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Buck\_Godot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/buck_godot/32/6573_2.png) [@Buck\_Godot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Buck_Godot)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/189 "2014-08-22T16:12:15Z")

</div>

And once again, true to form, we have 5 posts arguing with Bricker over a technical inconsistency in a throw away one liner unrelated to the topic at hand, just so Bricker can force his opponent to admit that he was wrong and Bricker was right, at the same time turning attention away from the real question of why Bricker feels that having a senate majority leader that threatens to shut down the government if the president doesn’t kowtow to their every whim is grounds for celebration with champagne (harmful or not).  
\*\*

Clarifications in case Bricker chooses to challenge my veracity: I recognize that the majority leader does not literally require Obama to get on his knees and bow, I am using kowtow in the vernacular to indicate agreeing an a submissive fashion. I am making an assumption that Bricker’s saying he would sip champagne indicates that he would be celebrating, when it entirely possible that he would be drinking to drown his sorrows or drinking purely for the health effects. If this assumption is incorrect than I humbly apologize to Bricker for casting aspersions on his asparagus. \*\*

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/190 "2014-08-22T16:33:28Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> You’re welcome. Do you now concede that sipping champagne is not a phrase that suggests self-harm?

Contingent on you conceding that “voting Republican”\* is\*.

Or don’t. This picayune tangent no longer interests me. I’ll be watching the American election the way many people watch footage of car crashes - the gruesome spectacle engrossing, followed by a "wow, sucks to be _him_, though he _did_ bring it on himself. "

Of course, if the driver manages to deftly or luckily avoid the damage, that’ll be cool, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 11:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/191 "2014-08-22T23:36:06Z")

</div>

> [@Buck\_Godot](#):
>
> And once again, true to form, we have 5 posts arguing with Bricker over a technical inconsistency in a throw away one liner unrelated to the topic at hand, just so Bricker can force his opponent to admit that he was wrong and Bricker was right, at the same time turning attention away from the real question of why Bricker feels that having a senate majority leader that threatens to shut down the government if the president doesn’t kowtow to their every whim is grounds for celebration with champagne (harmful or not).

Because you liberals don’t get to make throw-away one-liners as though this was some sort of safe haven, where we all just know how awful those terrible conservatives are.

If you want to say something, be prepared to defend it.

Not everyone reading agrees with you. Roughly half the country votes for the Republicans every two years. I know you like to picture the SDMB as Liberal Cocoon Central, where of course we all know the Correct Way of Thinking, but it’s not. And among my many burdens in life is to remind of the necessity for defending your claims with citations to fact.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 12:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/192 "2014-08-23T00:28:15Z")

</div>

I’m not actually a liberal, by the way. I guess if one tried to place me on a spectrum of American politics, I might _seem_ so, but by the standards of my own nation, I lean (and typically vote) conservative.

The Republican Party in its present incarnation is more insane than right-wing, though. Voting for them is self-abuse, and not the good kind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 1:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/193 "2014-08-23T01:16:08Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Save it. I’ll be sipping champagne.

Why the hell anyone would argue with **Bricker** about this quote is a mystery to me. Blaming **Bricker** for the hijack is equally, if not more, of a mystery. He’s a Republican. Whether one views that as right or wrong, why shouldn’t he celebrate if they win?

I certainly disagree with him on almost everything, and I dislike many aspects of his style of argument, but . . . Jeez Louise, people, this is getting out of hand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 1:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/194 "2014-08-23T01:45:01Z")

</div>

> [@Frank](#):
>
> Why the hell anyone would argue with **Bricker** about this quote is a mystery to me. Blaming **Bricker** for the hijack is equally, if not more, of a mystery. He’s a Republican. Whether one views that as right or wrong, why shouldn’t he celebrate if they win?
> 
> I certainly disagree with him on almost everything, and I dislike many aspects of his style of argument, but . . . Jeez Louise, people, this is getting out of hand.

I don’t understand your objection. If anything, Bricker’s the one being presumptuous by telling me to “save it”. I don’t begrudge him his celebration if the Republicans win, he shouldn’t begrudge me my pity for America if the Republicans win.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/195 "2014-08-23T02:19:14Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> I don’t understand your objection. If anything, Bricker’s the one being presumptuous by telling me to “save it”. I don’t begrudge him his celebration if the Republicans win, he shouldn’t begrudge me my pity for America if the Republicans win.

I can see how “save it” could be interpreted as dismissive. I think you should interpret it in context with his second sentence, which was celebratory. [End of my discussion on this matter. I’ve made my view clear.]

Even at the best view of Republican Senate successes this year, they would still not have enough votes to defeat a filibuster, and should they eliminate the current filibuster rules, not only has that been overdue since the days when a Senator no longer had to actually stand up and run his or her mouth, it gains them nothing. They still cannot override a veto.

It will make matters no worse than they already are, and will be easily returned to what we have today in 2016. (It will take until 2022 to fix the House.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 3:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/196 "2014-08-23T03:12:35Z")

</div>

It occurs to me in light of the way things are going in Iraq and Syria that the Republicans, should they win the Senate, should focus on winning the war. Give the President everything he needs to fight the war and keep him focused on the war by making it clear that it’s the #1 priority(and not one of many #1 priorities).

The President now has a job to do and it’s one of the things I believe he can do well. He’s never been reticent about killing our enemies and now he’s got a whole buttload of them out in the open. Go get 'em, Mr. President.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/197 "2014-08-23T03:17:02Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> It occurs to me in light of the way things are going in Iraq and Syria that the Republicans, should they win the Senate, should focus on winning the war.

What war? When did the House and the Senate vote on a declaration of war?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 3:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/198 "2014-08-23T03:21:39Z")

</div>

If the President requests a declaration of war, he’ll get one. Or any other level of authorization is wants.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 3:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/199 "2014-08-23T03:32:26Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> If the President requests a declaration of war, he’ll get one.

Heh. Against what nation, precisely, will the House vote to declare war at President Obama’s bidding?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 3:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426/200 "2014-08-23T03:42:48Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> If the President requests a declaration of war, he’ll get one.

General Orlov: Against _who?_

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426.md?page=9)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/gop-still-trending-to-win-senate/695426.md?page=11)
