Governor vs. Governess

Well, it’s not exactly my basis misconception. It’s not my idea. :rolleyes:

I would like to know which century you are describing. :smiley:

Sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

Your misconception is that the words Governor and Governess never had a similar meaning, when in fact they did at one time.

At any rate, the answer to “Language: Why?” is as simple and complex as “Because: Culture.”

I would prefer that you use the term “a misconception”, not “your misconception”. I prefer using “a”, not “your”, because it is less personal.

Honestly, if I really had known that they once meant the exact same thing, just male/female variants of the meaning, then I wouldn’t posted here, would I? :smack:

Really? Then whose idea was it?

Then it appears that it is your misconception, doesn’t it?

Nitpick: the guy doing the ducing would be a dux, “leader”. The word ductus is a passive participle, meaning “led”.

Somebody who follows the dux would be a ductus.

I picture a long line of ducti following the quacks. (Or their echos.) :smiley: