# Grammar question: Her or She?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [July 12, 2023, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953 "2023-07-12T19:05:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/1 "2023-07-12T19:05:43Z")

</div>

‘If there is anything that needs doing when you get home, it can be **HER** that does it.’

‘If there is anything that needs doing when you get home, it can be **SHE** that does it.’

As a native English speaker both of these sentences feel wrong, which one is correct and why?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Briny\_Deep](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/briny_deep/32/17188_2.png) [@Briny\_Deep](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Briny_Deep)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/2 "2023-07-12T19:10:51Z")

</div>

“She” is correct as the subject of “it can be she.” Think of “she can be it” vs. “her can be it.” You’ve just turned that construction around.

To nitpick, you should say “it can be she **who** does it,” not “that.”

And yes, the whole thing is awkward. You could just recast as “She can do anything that needs doing when you get home.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![solost](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/solost/32/11776_2.png) [@solost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/solost)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/3 "2023-07-12T19:11:08Z")

</div>

It’s the difference between subject and object.

Subject: _ **She** _ does the thing.

Object: The thing was done to _ **her** _.

So this is the correct sentence:

> [@Sitnam](#):
>
> ‘If there is anything that needs doing when you get home, it can be **SHE** that does it.’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/4 "2023-07-12T19:12:10Z")

</div>

“Be” verbs do complicate things. If the verb were a normal verb, ‘twould definitely be _her_ and not \*she". That’s what sounds correct to my ears. But I suspect my ears are wrong because of special rules for ‘to be’. I tend to say “It’s me” and not “It is I” but that don’t make me right or nuthin’…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/5 "2023-07-12T19:17:42Z")

</div>

As a non-native speaker, I would say the natural thing to say would be “she can do it”. Both your options feel wrong to you because that is not the way people speak. They are artificial.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/6 "2023-07-12T19:32:41Z")

</div>

Thanks. My education from Middle School was failing me here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/7 "2023-07-12T19:34:05Z")

</div>

> [@Pardel-Lux](#):
>
> As a non-native speaker, I would say the natural thing to say would be “she can do it”. Both your options feel wrong to you because that is not the way people speak. They are artificial.

I assure you, as a native speaker I hear the two sentences IRL all the time from others. There is nothing artificial about this question for us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlsoNamedBort](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alsonamedbort/32/3213_2.png) [@AlsoNamedBort](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AlsoNamedBort)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/8 "2023-07-12T19:36:22Z")

</div>

> [@Sitnam](#):
>
> I assure you, as a native speaker I hear the two sentences IRL all the time from others. There is nothing artificial about this question for us.

Native English speaker, can’t say I’ve heard a sentence like that before. A more natural construction would be “If there is anything that needs doing when you get home, she can do it”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/9 "2023-07-12T19:39:06Z")

</div>

I began this thread because I sent a text with the first sentence to my wife concerning our daughter.

I’m not going to argue about this any more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/10 "2023-07-12T19:47:42Z")

</div>

> [@AHunter3](#):
>
> "Be” verbs do complicate things

My layman’s understanding is that, whereas “normal” transitive verbs have objects (“It hit her”), “be” verbs have predicate nominitives (“It was she”).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/11 "2023-07-12T19:54:08Z")

</div>

> [@Sitnam](#):
>
> As a native English speaker both of these sentences feel wrong

When both options feel wrong, I’d try to find a less awkward wording, like “…she can be the one that does it.” But it’s still an interesting grammatical question.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/12 "2023-07-12T19:59:32Z")

</div>

Prescriptively, “she” is definitely correct, here.

But “her” sounds a lot more natural to my ears.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 8:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/13 "2023-07-12T20:13:01Z")

</div>

> [@Thudlow\_Boink](#):
>
> My layman’s understanding is that, whereas “normal” transitive verbs have objects (“It hit her”), “be” verbs have predicate nominitives (“It was she”).

I believe you are correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2023, 9:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/14 "2023-07-12T21:11:12Z")

</div>

> [@Briny\_Deep](#):
>
> To nitpick, you should say “it can be she **who** does it,” not “that.”

My mother taught me this. But I’m afraid that battle has been fought, and we lost. “That” and “who” are now almost universally equally accepted to refer to people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2023, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/15 "2023-07-13T16:07:02Z")

</div>

> [@Briny\_Deep](#):
>
> And yes, the whole thing is awkward. You could just recast as “She can do anything that needs doing when you get home.”

Yeah, that’s why they both feel weird I think; they’re awkward even if one of them was right.

‘If there is anything that needs doing when you get home, **she can do it.** ’

Some of it depends on what is meant by ‘can’ - it could denote either capability or responsibility; if the latter, then it might be better to say ‘She must do it’ or ‘She should do it’ or maybe ‘She will do it’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md-2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9d8465/32.png) [@md-2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md-2000)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2023, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/16 "2023-07-13T16:49:22Z")

</div>

Yes, it’s the whole problem with the verb “to be”. verbs are normally transitive (action on a possible object of the sentence) or intransitive (no object of the sentence). “To be” is (as Sesame street says) “not like the other ones”. It is copulative.

> A copulative verb is a verb form that joins a subject to an adjective or to another noun. The verb to be is a copulative verb. So are the linking verbs (seem, appear, look, become, and others).  
> The verb to be may join a subject to a noun or an adjective.

So grammar-wise, “to be” joins a noun with a noun. (or…pronouns) The joined noun is not an object of verbal action, so the appropriate form of pronoun in that regard is the subject form. Hence, for example when someone says “It is me!” the grammar Nazis will immediately point out the correct wording is “It is I!” - even though popular speech has immortalized “It’s me!” as sounding bigly good.

> [@Sitnam](#):
>
> ‘If there is anything that needs doing when you get home, it can be **HER** that does it.’  
> ‘If there is anything that needs doing when you get home, it can be **SHE** that does it.’

Rearrange these, and “…it can be that she does it.” also works (IMHO sounds less awkward). In this case “that” works as the copulative noun, and the subject of the clause is obviously “she” since it is the subject of “can do”. (and obviously “it” is the object receiving the action…)

Either way, she can do it. What’s more important, completing the tasks or good grammar?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2023, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/17 "2023-07-13T18:22:55Z")

</div>

The arguing. _That’s_ what most important. This is the Dope; you knew that.

Actually, all these forms are wrong since the subject person’s pronouns are E and they. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2023, 6:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/18 "2023-07-13T18:56:22Z")

</div>

Both are bizarrely convoluted to me, but the second sounds correct. Neither construction would necessarily leap out at me as wrong, just a bit Byzantine in phrasing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2023, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/19 "2023-07-13T19:01:04Z")

</div>

Phrasing so convoluted bizarrely is yet another thing up with which one should not needs put.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jebbilene](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jebbilene/32/3414_2.png) [@Jebbilene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jebbilene)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2023, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953/20 "2023-07-13T22:59:35Z")

</div>

I think this sentence sounds so weird because it has two dummy subjects (‘there’ and ‘it’). Not that there is anything wrong with dummy subjects but they leave the actor/agent role a bit up in the air, and this sentence indicates ‘she’ very clearly as an agent. How about:

‘If there is anything that needs doing when you get home, she can be the one to do it.’

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/grammar-question-her-or-she/986953.md?page=2)
