# Greatest Generals in History

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [November 17, 2004, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338 "2004-11-17T21:19:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2004, 2:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/41 "2004-11-19T14:04:49Z")

</div>

I always thought Lee should be considered in the light that, after he lost Jackson, everything started going to hell for him.

I think there’s a strong case to be made that, while Lee was inspiration and a focal point, Jackson was the truly driven and brilliant general-on-the-field.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sunshine\_and\_Smiles](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a5b964/32.png) [@Sunshine\_and\_Smiles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sunshine_and_Smiles)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2004, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/42 "2004-11-19T22:37:59Z")

</div>

General Questions, I’d say.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snooooopy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ee7513/32.png) [@Snooooopy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snooooopy)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2004, 4:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/43 "2004-11-20T04:25:15Z")

</div>

> [@RandomLetters](#):
>
> Don’t forget General Winter, the Russian general who was massively helpful in turning back both the invading French and later German armies.

The way I always heard that one was that the finest generals in Russian military history were General January and General February.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![casdave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c6cbf5/32.png) [@casdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/casdave)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2004, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/44 "2004-11-20T16:10:44Z")

</div>

The differance between Napoleon and Wellesley is that one was a great battlefield tactician, and the other was that plus a master strategist.

Napoleon certainly was not a great strategist, all his hard won victories were negated by his failure to see a wider picture, Wellesley on the other hand was more than prepared to wait for the opportunity, ready to plan and decide where and when to choose to attack.

Napoleon could not see his own weaknesses, he took on roles for which he did not have the technical knowledge, and he didn’t have the vision to see this, hence his failure to appreciate Naval warfare and his disastrous campaign in Egypt.  
If he had truly understood maritime power, he might have disrupted British trade more effectively and prevented them building up the resources that would crush him.

Wellesley made his mistakes in India, and learned from them very rapidly, taking on enemy armies that outnumbered his by several times and producing a series of stunning victories every bit as accomplished as Napoleon ever did.

Its like comparing Ike to Patton, one wins battles, the other wins wars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2004, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/45 "2004-11-20T17:35:55Z")

</div>

> [@casdave](#):
>
> Napoleon could not see his own weaknesses, he took on roles for which he did not have the technical knowledge, and he didn’t have the vision to see this, hence his failure to appreciate Naval warfare and his disastrous campaign in Egypt.

Some say he agreed(or thought up) the Egyptian campaign not as a great strategic move – it of course was an immensely ill-thought out move strategically – but as the best move possible _for him_ at that moment.

If he won, he would be the national hero and have the country in his grasp. If he lost, at least he would be out of the cutthroat world of Paris politics for awhile.

Not being familiar with the Directorate era, I couldn’t say if that’s true or not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2004, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/46 "2004-11-20T18:22:44Z")

</div>

> [@Arch Trout](#):
>
> Motors and Electric.

> [@detop](#):
>
> You forgot Food…

Let’s not forget Generals Mills, Tire. Nutrition, and Dynamics.

Captains of industry, every one.

And the most complex general of all, General Relativity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2004, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/47 "2004-11-20T19:13:17Z")

</div>

George S. Patton, who understood the use of armor, the importance of hitting hard and fast, and was able to go extreme distances (for his time) wihtout allowing himself to be cut off from supply lines.

Erwin Rommel, who literally wrote the book on armor and desert warfare.

Atilla the Hun, who “educated” all of Europe as to the value of light cavalry.

Napoleon, a master in the use of artillery in support of cavalry and infantry, who also knew how to use terrain to mask troop movements.

Vlad the Impaler, who almost singlehandedly did what all the kings and emperors could not do - keep the world class Ottoman Empire out of Rumania.

A few more, and I can’t believe you all missed it - Major Disaster, Private Parts and Seaman Stain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vl\_mungo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/bc8723/32.png) [@vl\_mungo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vl_mungo)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2004, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/48 "2004-11-20T20:40:49Z")

</div>

General Store has always been one of my favorites.

I’d also nominate Themistocles

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2004, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/49 "2004-11-20T22:28:16Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I am SO not qualified to answer this but if you put a stranglehold on your enemy’s transportation and supplies, cut their territory in two and on top of it all they call you “the Butcher” you must be doing something right.
> 
> That would be Sherman.

Without minimizing Sherman’s abilities, it should be noted that he was carrying out Grant’s strategy (and building on tactics that Grant had pioneered in Mississippi during the Vicksburg campaign).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cicero](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cicero/32/3594_2.png) [@Cicero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cicero)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2004, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/50 "2004-11-21T00:05:06Z")

</div>

I’m not surprised he hasn’t been mentioned, but the Australian Jew Sir John Monash is often rated as one of the best generals of the Great War.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6bbea6/32.png) [@bup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bup)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2004, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/51 "2004-11-21T00:41:49Z")

</div>

I don’t know much about any of this, but maybe someone can fight some ignorance - somehow, Ethiopia was not a colony at the beginning of the twentieth century - I believe the only part of Africa that never was. Given their technological disadvantage, I’d tip my hat to any military leader that fended off a European invasion.

Do any Ethiopian tacticians need to be mentioned?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2004, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338/52 "2004-11-21T02:00:36Z")

</div>

> [@SteveG1](#):
>
> Atilla the Hun, who “educated” all of Europe as to the value of light cavalry.

Eh, well, Attila never really won any major battles ( he hardly fought any, for one thing ). His military campaigns were rather similar to the later Magyars - essentially long-range raids. The one big fight that he got pulled into at Chalons he came off worse ( though it was hardly decisive ). Undoubtedly a great political leader, but his military abilities ( beyond the level of at least competent ) are harder to assess.

The Parthians had educated the Romans about light calvary centuries earlier at Carrhae ;).

> [@](#):
>
> Vlad the Impaler, who almost singlehandedly did what all the kings and emperors could not do - keep the world class Ottoman Empire out of Rumania.

I might quibble with this one as well. He is remembered as a great patriotic hero in Roumania and he was certainly a ferocious opponent, but he owed much of his long-term success to adroitly playing off the Hungarians and the Ottomans. Fact is the Ottomans weren’t aggressively trying to annex Wallachia during most of this period - they were aggressively trying to maintain it as a vassal and buffer against Hungary. Good old Vlad made his first bid for power with the backing of Turkish troops and while his scorched earth and terror campaign in 1462 convinced Mehmed II to personally throw in the towel ( he had better things to do ), really it wasn’t much of a success as it was a Turco-Roumanian army under Vlad’s brother Radu that continued on to drive him out that same year. When he next tangled with the Turks in 1476 ( after regaining the throne in 1475 ) he was killed in the fighting.

> [@bup](#):
>
> Do any Ethiopian tacticians need to be mentioned?

There was one particularly capable general, Ras Alula, who was perhaps primarily responsible for the victory over the Egyptians at Gura in 1875 and over the Italians at Dogali in 1887.

But the main Italian defeat at Aduwa was really more a matter of serious Italian tactical and strategic blunders, rather than Ethiopian acumen. If Baratieri ( a not incompetent man ) had just listened to his own better instincts instead of his vainglorious lieutenants, Aduwa would never have happened. For one thing the Ethiopian army could not have remained in the vicinity much longer before they would have had to disperse, as they were at the very end of their logistic stamina. Further Baratieri had reinforcements ( and unknown to him a replacement, as he was seen as too slow and cautious ) on the way. Finally misleading maps did them in, allowing the army to get seperated into isolated, vulnerable columns in mountainous terrain on the day of the battle.

- Tamerlane

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/greatest-generals-in-history/275338.md?page=2)
