Reading the facts, I am rather proud to be a citizen of a country where leading steps are being taken to help and protect “the oppression of intelligent and self-aware beings who cannot speak for themselves.”
Beyond that read the bolded/colored part, you’ll notice tha this measure does NOT equate to giving Apes the equivalent of Human Rights.
That’s all. You may now go on lighting candles to your wingnut idol/tool, Aznar.
There’s nothing I disagree with, in these statements.
I think this is where we begin to part ways.
I don’t agree with that particular interpretation of the Geneva Conventions. That is, the interpretation that a signatory should only abide by the “rules” when engaged with another signatory. That’s probably a completely different debate, though.
I’m not sure what you mean here, by “drafted rather than evolved”. Laws are drafted at some point as well, and then given time to evolve. I believe the same needs to occur for things like international conventions, and human rights movements.
I can’t argue that it’s not poking their noses into other people’s business. I think you’re exactly right on that point. But I think that, sometimes, it’s necessary (and morally necessary) to stick your nose in other people’s business. I realize that this is a very slippery slope, though.
It’s one thing to impose one country’s laws on another country’s citizens. I think it’s a completely different thing to impose international law on a country’s citizens, though.
LilShieste