Indeed.
But how do you explain my reaction here when the Sixth Circuit upheld the individual mandate?
In other words, I argue from principle, rather than from partisan position. You’re correct to say that I have always had a dislike of the law, as that post shows. But I also immediately agreed (even before the court challenges) that the individual mandate was Constitutional, even though I could have easily claimed “rock solid certitude” for the opposite position. Indeed, the SCOTUS decision was 5-4.
So there’s a time-stamped, dated proof of me taking a constitutional interpretation position than ran counter to my ideological position.
Something you never do, by the way. Never. All your positions just happen to run with your political goals.
That’s not how I roll.